Deception and magic in collaborative interaction

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 567-576

  Marshall, Joe ^a   Benford, Steve ^a   Pridmore, Tony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ambiguity; deception; feedthrough; interaction; magic; misdirection; performance; spectator interface; trajectories

Indexed keywords

AMBIGUITY; COLLABORATIVE INTERACTION; COMPUTER VISION SYSTEM; CURRENT THEORIES; FEED THROUGH;

COMPUTER VISION; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

TRAJECTORIES;

EID: 77953982050     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753410     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bellotti, V., Back, M., Edwards, W.K., Grinter, R.E., Henderson, A., and Lopes, C. Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers. In CHI, 2002, 415-422.
2. Benford, S., Giannachi, G., Koleva, B., and Rodden, T. From interaction to trajectories: Designing coherent journeys through user experiences. In CHI, 2009, 709-718.
3. Binet, A. Psychology of prestidigitation. Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution, 1894 555-571.
4. Boehner, K. and Hancock, J.T. Advancing ambiguity. In CHI, 2006, 103-106.
5. Bowen, G. Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. Int. Jnl. Qualitative Methods 5, 3 (2006), 1-9.
6. Dix, A. Challenges for cooperative work on the web: An analytical approach. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 6, 2-3 (1997), 135-156.
7. Gaver, W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In CHI, 2003, 233-240.
8. Gaver, W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Law, A., Pennington, S., and Villar, N. The history tablecloth: illuminating domestic activity. In DIS, 2006, 199-208.
9. Nardi, P. Toward a social psychology of entertainment magic. Symbolic Interaction 7, 1 (1984), 25-42.
10. Neagoe, V. and Bishop, M. Inconsistency in deception for defense. In NSPW '06: Proceedings of the 2006 workshop on New security paradigms, 2006, 31-38.
11. Norman, D.A. The Design of Everyday Things. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990.
12. Reeves, S., Benford, S., O'Malley, C., and Fraser, M. Designing the spectator experience. In CHI, 2005, 741-750.
13. Rowe, N.C. Designing good deceptions in defense of information systems. In 20th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, 2004, 418-427.
14. Schnädelbach, H., Rennick Egglestone, S., Reeves, S., Benford, S., Walker, B., and Wright, M. Performing thrill: designing telemetry systems and spectator interfaces for amusement rides. In CHI, 2008, 1167-76.
15. Sengers, P. and Gaver, B. Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In DIS, 2006, 99-108.
16. Tatler, B.W. and Kuhn, G. Don't look now: The magic of misdirection. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, and R. Hill, eds., Eye Movement Research: Insights into mind and brain. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2007, 697-714.
17. Tognazzini, B. Principles, techniques, and ethics of stage magic and their application to human interface design. In CHI, 1993, 355-362.
18. Triplett, N. The psychology of conjuring deceptions. American Journal of Psychology 11, 4 (1900), 493-510.
19. vom Lehn, D., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P., and Heath, C. Engaging constable: revealing art with new technology. In CHI, 2007, 1485-1494.
20. Wiseman, R. and Greening, E. 'it's still bending': Verbal suggestion and alleged psychokinetic ability. British Journal of Psychology 96, 1 (2005), 115-127. (Pubitemid 40251467)