Writing practices in Swedish teacher education and the inclusion/exclusion of subjectivities

Critical Studies in Education

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 145-158

  Lenz Taguchi, Hillevi ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Academic writing; Discourse analysis; Feminist poststructuralism; Inclusion exclusion

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953969804     PISSN: 17508487     EISSN: 17508495     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17508480802072921     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Pierre, E.A.S. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: an overview. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(1), 71-84.
2. Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (Eds.). (2008). Material feminisms. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
3. Barad, K. (2008). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. In Stacy Alaimo, & Susan Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 120-15)4. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
4. Biesta, G. (2006). 'Don't count me in'. Democracy, education and the question of inclusion. Nordisk Pedagogik, 27(1), 18-31.
5. Biesta, G. (2007). Five theses on complexity reduction and its politics. Paper for the Chaos and Complexity SIG Symposium of AERA, March 24-28, New York, 2008. Bill 1999/2000: 135. En förnyad lärarutbildning [A renewed teacher-education]. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
6. Burman, E., & MacLure, M. (2005). Deconstruction. In Bridget Somekh, & Cathy Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 318-325). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage Publications.
7. Butler, J. (1997). Psychic life of power. Theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8. Butler, J. (2000). Restaging the universal: hegemony and the limits of formalism. In Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, & Slavoj Zizek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality. Contemporary dialogues on the left (pp. 11-43). London & New York: Verso.
9. Davies, B. (2000). A body of writing 1990-1999. Walnut Creek, CA & Oxford: Alta MiraPress.
10. Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2005). Feminism/poststructuralism. In Bridget Somekh, & Cathy Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 284-292). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage Publications.
11. Ellsworth, E. (1992). Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. In Camen Luke, & Jennifer Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 90-119). New York & London: Routledge.
12. Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. In Hubert L. Dreyfus, & Paul Rabinow (Eds.), Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Herforshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
13. Gore, J. (1992). What we can do for you! What can 'we' do for 'you'? Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In Camen Luke, & Jennifer Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 54-73). New York & London: Routledge.
14. Grosz, E. (2005). Time travels. Feminism, nature, power. Durham: Duke University Press.
15. Haraway, D.J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women. The reinvention of nature. New York & London: Routledge.
16. Haraway, D.J. (1997). Modest_witness@second:millennium. Femaleman_meets_oncomouse. Feminism and technoscience. New York & London: Routledge.
17. Hekman, S. (2008). Construction the ballast: an ontology for feminism. In Stacy Alaimo, & Susan Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 85-119). Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
18. Hemmingson, A. (2007). Hopp eller avhopp? Förstudie om kvarvarofrågan på fyra lärosäten i Stockholm [Hopefulness or dropping out? A study of the dropping-out rate at four universities in Stockholm]. Månfaldsgruppen Stockholms Akademiska Forum.
19. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress. Education as the practice of freedom. New York & London: Routledge.
20. HSV. (2006). [Examination theses in the new teacher education]. Swedish National Agency for Higher Education report 2006:47R. Stockholm: Sweden.
21. Hultqvist, E., & Palme, M. (2006). 'Om de kunde ge en mall' En studie av lärarstudenternas möte med lärarutbidlningen ['If they could only give me a guide'. A study of teacher students encounter with teacher education.]. Department of Society, Culture and Learning, Stockholm Institute of Education and The Research Group of Educational Research and Cultural Sociology at Uppsala University.
22. Jung, J. (2005). Revisionary rhetoric, feminist pedagogy, and multigenre texts. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
23. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart. Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York & London: Routledge.
24. Lather, P. (2007). Getting lost. Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. New York: State University of New York Press. Lenz
25. Taguchi, H. (2005). Getting personal: how early childhood teacher education troubles students' and teacher educators identities regarding subjectivity and feminism. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood Education, 6(3), 244-255.
26. Lenz Taguchi, H. (2006). Reconceptualizing early childhood education. Challenging taken-for-granted ideas. In J. Einarsdóttir, & J. Wagner (Eds.), Nordic childhoods and early education. Philosophy, research, policy and practice in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden (pp. 257-287). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
27. Lenz Taguchi, H. (2007). Deconstructing and transgressing the theory-practice dichotomy in Swedish early childhood education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(3), 275-290.
28. Lorde, A. (1984). The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. In Sisters Outsider. Fredoom, CA: Crossing Press.
29. Mac Naughton, G. (2006). Doing Foucault in early childhood studies. Applying poststructural ideas. Oxford & New York: Routledge.
30. Malka Fisher, B. (2001). No angel in the classroom. Teaching through feminist discourse. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc
31. Mayberry, M., & Rose, E.C. (Eds.). (1999). Innovative feminist pedagogies in action. New York & London: Routledge.
32. Orner, M. (1992). Interrupting the calls for student voice in 'liberatory' education: a feminist poststructuralist perspective. In Camen Luke, & Jennifer Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 74-89). New York & London: Routledge.
33. Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (in press). The End/s of Education. Complexity and the Conundrum of the Indlusive Education Curriculum. International Journal of Inclusive Education.
34. Palmer, A. (in press). 'I'm not a "math's person"!' Reconsituting mathematical subjectivities in aesthetic teaching practices. Gender and Education.
35. Richardsson, L. (1997). Fields of play. Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
36. Sabel, K-G. (2007) Statistical letters from the Stockholm Institute of Education. Internal material. Stockholm, Sweden.
37. Scott, J. (1992). Experience. In Judith Butler, & Joan W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 22-39). New York & London: Routledge.
38. Walkerdine, W. (1998). Counting girls out. London: Virago.