Powerful and consistent analysis of likert-type ratingscales

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 4, Issue , 2010, Pages 2391-2394

  Kaptein, Maurits Clemens ^a   Nass, Clifford ^b   Markopoulos, Panos ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

nonparametric statistics; researchmethods; usability evaluation

Indexed keywords

FACTORIAL DESIGN; MULTIPLE FACTORS; NON-PARAMETRIC; NON-PARAMETRIC STATISTICS; SAMPLE SIZES; STATISTICAL POWER; USABILITY EVALUATION;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; STATISTICS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 77953966210     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753686     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. C. A. Boneau. The effects of violations of assumptions underlying the t test. Psychological Bulletin, 57:49-64, 1960.
2. E. Brunner, S. Domhof, and F. Langer. Nonparametric Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Factorial Experiments, volume Total Quality Management. John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
3. E. Brunner and U. Munzel. Nichtparametrische Datenanalyse. Springer, 2002.
4. E. Brunner, U. Munzel, and M. L. Puri. Rank-score tests in factorial designs with repeated measures. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 70:286-317, 1999.
5. E. Brunner and M. L. Puri. Nonparametric methods in factorial designs. Statistical Papers, 42:1-51, 2001.
6. J. Carifio and R. Perla. Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Med Educ, 42:1150-52.
7. J. Carifio and R. Perla. Ten Common Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and their Antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3:106-116.
8. R. A. Cribbie and H. J. Keselman. The effects of nonnormality on parametric, nonparametric, and model comparison approaches to pairwise comparisons. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63:615-635, 2003.
9. G. V. Glass, P. D. Peckham, and J. R. Sanders. Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42(3):237-288, 1972.
10. M. C. Hart. Improving the discrimination of SERVQUAL by using magnitude scaling, volume Total Quality Management. Chapman & Hall, 1996.
11. M. Hassenzahl. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19:319-349, 2004. (Pubitemid 40226258)
12. S. Hora and W. Conover. The f-statistic in the two-way layout with rank-score transformed data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79:668-673, 1984.
13. R. Likert. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 5:228-238, 1932.
14. U. Munzel and B. Bandelow. The use of parametric versus nonparametric tests in the statistical evaluation of ratings scales. Pharmacopsychiatry, 6:222-224, 1998.
15. J. Preece, Y. Rogers, and Sharp. Interaction Design. John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
16. S. S. Sawilowsky and R. C. Blair. A more realistic look at the robustness and type ii error probabilities of the t test to departures from population normality. Psychological Bulletin, 111:352-360, 1992.
17. D. A. Shah and L. V. Madden. Nonparametric analysis of ordinal data in designed factorial experiments. Pythopathology, 94:33-60, 2004.
18. T. Tullis and W. Albert. Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Morgan Kaufman, 2008.
19. R. R. Wilcos. Comparing the means of two independent groups. Biometrics Journal, 32:771-780, 1990.