A small-area ecologic study of myocardial infarction, neighborhood deprivation, and sex: A bayesian modeling approach

Epidemiology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 459-466

  Deguen, Séverine ^a   Lalloue, Benoît ^a   Bard, Denis ^a   Havard, Sabrina ^a,b   Arveiler, Dominique ^c   Zmirou Navier, Denis ^a,b,d  

^a EHESP SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; ECOLOGY; FEMALE; FRANCE; GENDER; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX DIFFERENCE; AGED; BAYES THEOREM; DEMOGRAPHY; MARKOV CHAIN; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL ISOLATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; BAYES THEOREM; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MALE; MARKOV CHAINS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL ISOLATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 77953956962     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e09925     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937-952.
2. Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G, et al. Cardiovascular prevention guidelines in daily practice: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II, and III surveys in eight European countries. Lancet. 2009;373:929-940.
3. Fiscella K, Tancredi D. Socioeconomic status and coronary heart disease risk prediction. JAMA. 2008;300:2666-2668.
4. Diez-Roux AV, Merkin SS, Arnett D, et al. Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:99-106.
5. Gonzalez MA, Rodriguez AF, Calero JR. Relationship between socio-economic status and ischaemic heart disease in cohort and case-control studies: 1960-1993. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27:350-358.
6. Kaplan GA, Keil JE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation. 1993;88:1973-1998.
7. Rosengren A, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11,119 cases and 13,648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364:953-962.
8. Morrison C, Woodward M, Leslie W, et al. Effect of socioeconomic group on incidence of, management of, and survival after myocardial infarction and coronary death: analysis of community coronary event register. Br Med J. 1997;314:541-546.
9. Picciotto S, Forastiere F, Stafoggia M, et al. Associations of area based deprivation status and individual educational attainment with incidence, treatment, and prognosis of first coronary event in Rome, Italy. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:37-43.
10. Salomaa V, Niemela M, Miettinen H, et al. Relationship of socioeco-nomic status to the incidence and prehospital, 28-day, and 1-year mortality rates of acute coronary events in the FINMONICA myocardial infarction register study. Circulation. 2000;101:1913-1918.
11. Thurston RC, Kubzansky LD, Kawachi I, et al. Is the association between socioeconomic position and coronary heart disease stronger in women than in men? Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:57-65.
12. Vogels EA, Lagro-Janssen AL, van Weel C. Sex differences in cardiovascular disease: are women with low socioeconomic status at high risk? Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:963-966.
13. Sundquist K, Malmstrom M, Johansson SE. Neighbourhood deprivation and incidence of coronary heart disease: a multilevel study of 2.6 million women and men in Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58: 71-77. (Pubitemid 38058036)
14. Winkleby M, Sundquist K, Cubbin C. Inequities in CHD incidence and case fatality by neighborhood deprivation. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:97-106.
15. Diez-Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Muntaner C, et al. Neighborhood environments and coronary heart disease: a multilevel analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146:48-63.
16. Kolegard SM, Diderichsen F, Reuterwall C, et al. Socioeconomic context in area of living and risk of myocardial infarction: results from Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:29-35.
17. Stjarne MK, Ponce de LA, Hallqvist J. Contextual effects of social fragmentation and material deprivation on risk of myocardial infarction-results from the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP). Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:732-741.
18. Elliott P, Wakefield J, Best N, et al. Spatial Epidemiology: Methods and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
19. Kaufman JS. Interaction reaction. Epidemiology. 2009;20:159-160.
20. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Amouyel P, et al. Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project. Registration procedures, event rates, and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in four continents. Circulation. 1994;90: 583-612.
21. Arveiler D, Wagner A, Ducimetiere P, et al. Trends in coronary heart disease in France during the second half of the 1990s. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005;12:209-215.
22. Barakat K, Stevenson S, Wilkinson P, et al. Socioeconomic differentials in recurrent ischaemia and mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2001;85:390-394.
23. Davies CA, Dundas R, Leyland AH. Increasing socioeconomic inequalities in first acute myocardial infarction in Schotland, 1990-1992 and 2000-02. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:134.
24. Havard S, Deguen S, Bodin J, et al. A small-area index of socioeconomic deprivation to capture health inequalities in France. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:2007-2016.
25. Laurent O, Filleul L, Havard S, et al. Asthma attacks and deprivation: gradients in use of mobile emergency medical services. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62:1014-1016.
26. Havard S, Deguen S, Zmirou-Navier D, et al. Traffic-related air pollution and socioeconomic status: A spatial autocorrelation study to assess environmental equity on a small-area scale. Epidemiology. 2009;20:223-230.
27. Besag J, York J, Mollie A. Bayesian image restoration with two applications in spatial statistics. Ann Inst Stat Math. 1991;43:1-21.
28. Lawson A, Browne W, Vidal Rodeiro C. Disease Mapping With Win-BUGS and MLWin. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
29. Spiegelhalter D, Best N, Carlin B, et al. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). JRoyal Stat Soc B. 2002;64:583-640.
30. Rothman KJ. Interactions between causes. In: Modern Epidemiology. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company; 1986:311:326.
31. Brooks S, Gelman A. Alternative methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comput Graph Stat. 1998;7:434-455.
32. Knol MJ, Egger M, Scott P, et al. When one depends on the other: reporting of interaction in case-control and cohort studies. Epidemiology. 2009;20:161-166.
33. Greenland S. Interactions in epidemiology: relevance, identification, and estimation. Epidemiology. 2009;20:14-17.
34. VanderWeele TJ. Sufficient cause interactions and statistical interactions. Epidemiology. 2009;20:6-13.
35. Stjarne MK, Fritzell J, De Leon AP, et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic context, individual income and myocardial infarction. Epidemiology. 2006;17:14-23.
36. Loucks EB, Rehkopf DH, Thurston RC, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in metabolic syndrome differ by gender: evidence from NHANES III. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:19-26.
37. Sobal J, Stunkard AJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychol Bull. 1989;105:260-275.
38. Tang M, Chen Y, Krewski D. Gender-related differences in the association between socioeconomic status and self-reported diabetes. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:381-385.
39. Dallongeville J, Cottel D, Ferrieres J, et al. Household income is associated with the risk of metabolic syndrome in a sex-specific manner. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:409-415.
40. Singh GK, Kogan MD. Persistent socioeconomic disparities in infant, neonatal, and postneonatal mortality rates in the United States, 1969-2001. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e928-e939.
41. Lynch J, Davey SG, Harper S. Explaining the social gradient in coronary heart disease: comparing relative and absolute risk approaches. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:436-441.
42. Bhaskaran S, Hajat A, Smeeth L. Effects of air pollution on the incidence of myocardial infarction. Heart. 2009;95:1746-1759.
43. Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. The effect of particulate air pollution on emergency admissions for myocardial infarction: A multi-city case-crossover analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:978-982.
44. Lang T, Ducimetiere P, Arveiler D, et al. Incidence, case fatality, risk factors of acute coronary heart disease and occupational categories in men aged 30-59 in France. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26:47-57.
45. Graham P. Intelligent smoothing using hierarchical Bayesian models [commentary]. Epidemiology. 2008;19:493-495.
46. Beard JR, Earnest A, Morgan G, et al. Socioeconomic disadvantage and acute coronary events: a spatiotemporal analysis. Epidemiology. 2008; 19:485-492.
47. Naess O, Piro FN, Nafstad P, et al. Air pollution, social deprivation, and mortality: a multilevel cohort study. Epidemiology. 2007;18:686-694.