Vital pulp therapy for the primary dentition

General Dentistry

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 194-200

  Sue Seale, N ^a   Coll, James A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DENTAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTITION; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; DENTAL CARE FOR CHILDREN; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PULP CAPPING; DENTAL PULP NECROSIS; DENTITION, PRIMARY; ENDODONTICS; HUMANS; PULPECTOMY; PULPOTOMY; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 77953954325     PISSN: 03636771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Farooq NSr Coll JAr Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000;22(4): 278-286
2. Falster CA, Araujo FB, Straffon LH, Nor JE. Indirect pulp treatment: In vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs. calcium hydoxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24(3):241-248
3. Al-Zayer MA, Straffon LH, Feigal RJ, Welch KB. Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth: A retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 2003;25(1): 29-36
4. Vij R, Coll JA, Shelton P, Farooq NS. Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy. Pediatr Dent 2004;26(3):214-220
5. Fuks AB. Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: New directions and treatment perspectives. Pediatr Dent 2008;30(3):211-219
6. Coll JA. Indirect pulp capping and primary teeth Is the primary tooth pulpotomy out of date? Pediatr Dent 2008;30(3):230-246
7. McDonald RE, Avery DR. In McDonald RE, Avery DR, eds. Dentistry for the child and adolescent, ed. 6. St Louis: Mosby-rear Book, lnc.;1994: 428-454
8. Camp JH, Fuks AB. Pediatric endodontics: Endodontic treatment for the primary and young permanent dentition. In:Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, eds. Pathways of the pulp, ed. 9. St. Louis: CV Mosby;2005:822-882
9. Smith NL, Seale NS, Nunn ME. Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: A retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 2000;22(3): 192-199
10. Fei AL, Udin RD, Johnson R. A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 1991,13(6)327-332
11. Fuks AB, Holan G, Davis JM, Eidelman E. Ferric sulfate versus dilute formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: Long-term follow-up. Pediatr Dent 1997;19(5):327-330
12. Papagiannoulis L Clinical studies on ferric sulphate as a pulpotomy medicament in primary molars. Eur J PaeadiaH Dent 2002;3:126-132
13. Ibricevic H, Al-Jame Q. Ferric sulfate as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth, twenty-month clinical follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2000;24(4); 269-272
14. Huth KC, Paschos E, Hajek-AI-Khatar N, Holl-weck R, Crispin A, Hickel R, Folwaczny M. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques: Randomized controlled trial, J Dent Res 2005; 84(12):1144-1148
15. Markovic D, ZibojinovicV, Bucetic M. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2005;6(3):133-138
16. Peng L, Ye L, Guo X, Tan H, Zhou X, Wang C, Li R. Evaluation of formocresol versus ferric sulphate primary molar pulpotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Ended J 2007;40(10): 751-757
17. Loh A, O'Hoy P, Tran X, Charles R, Hughes A, Ku-bo K, Messer LB. Evidence-based assessment Evaluation of the formocresol versus ferric sulfate pulpotomy. Pediatr Dent 2004;26(5):401-409
18. Agamy HA, Bakry NS, Mounir MM, Avery DR. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2004;26(4): 302-309
19. Jabbarifar SE, Khadeni DD, Ghaseni DD. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy vs. mineral triox-de aggregate in human primary molar tooth. J Res Med Sci 2004;6:55-58
20. Farsi N, Alamoudi N, Balto K, Mushayt A. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005,29(4): 307-311
21. Holan G, Eidelman E, Fuks AB. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol. Pediatr Dent 2005;27(2):129-136
22. Naik S, Hedge AM. Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy agent in primary molars:An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2005;23(1): 13-16
23. Ng FK, Messer LB. Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament:An evidence-based assessment, Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2008;9(2): 58-73
24. Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary dentition. In: Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Fields HW, Mc-Tigue DJ, Nowak AJ, eds. Pediatric dentistry: Infancy through adolescence, ed. 4. St. Louis: Elsevier/Saunders,2005:375-393
25. King SR, McWhorter AG, Seale NS. Concentration of formocresol used by pediatric dentists in primary tooth pulpotomy. Pediatr Dent 2002,24(2): 157-159
26. Milnes AR. Is formocresol obsolete? A fresh look at the evidence. Pediatr Dent 2008;30(3):237-246
27. Lemon RR, Steele PJ, Jeansoone BG. Ferric sulfate hemostasis: Effect on osseous wound healing. Left in situ for maximum exposure. J Endod 1993; 19(4):170-173
28. Bjorndal L, Larsen T. Thylsrup A. A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res 1997;31(6):411-417
29. Zurn D, Seale NS. Light-cured calcium hydroxide vs formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomy: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent 2008;30(1):34-41
30. AAPD Reference Manual. Pediatr Dent 2009;31 (6 Spec lssue):79-188.