Acute complications of Crohn's disease: Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomographic enterography with magnetic resonance enterography

Digestion

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 229-238

  Schmidt, Sabine ^a   Guibal, Aymeric ^b   Meuwly, Jean Yves ^a   Michetti, Pierre ^a   Felley, Christian ^a   Meuli, Reto ^a   Schnyder, Pierre ^a   Denys, Alban ^a  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Crohn's disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; Small intestine

Indexed keywords

ACCUPAQUE; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; METHYLCELLULOSE; RECOMBINANT GLUCAGON; SCOPOLAMINE BUTYL BROMIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABSCESS; ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROHN DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE EXACERBATION; ENTERITIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE FISTULA; INTESTINE STENOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ENTEROGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ENTEROGRAPHY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIODIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; SYMPTOM;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CROHN DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77953937700     PISSN: 00122823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000288521     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hara AK, Alam S, Heigh RI, Gurudu SR, Hentz JG, Leighton JA: Using CT-enterography to monitor Crohn's disease activity: a preliminiary study. AJR 2008;190:1512-1516.
2. Higgins PD, Caoili E, Zimmermann M, et al: Computed tomographic enterography adds information to clinical management in small bowel Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007;13:262-268.
3. Booya F, Fletcher JG, Huprich JE, et al: Active Crohn disease: C T findings and interob - server agreement for enteric phase CT enterography. Radiology 2006;241:787-795.
4. Liu YB, Liang CH, Zhang ZL, et al: Crohn disease of the smalll bowel: multidetector row CT with CT enteroclysis, dynamic contrast enhancement, CT angiography, and 3D imaging. Abdom Imaging 2006;31:668-674.
5. Mazzeo S, Caramella D, Battolla L, et al: Crohn disease of the small bowel: spiral CT evaluation after oral hyperhydration with isotonic solution. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:612-616.
6. Schmidt S, Felley C, Meuwly J-Y, Schnyder P, Denys A: MDCT enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2006;16:648-660.
7. Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, et al: Abdominal MRI after enterocylsis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroent Hepatol 2004;2:491-497.
8. Gourtsoyiannis NC, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, et al: Imaging of small intestinal Crohn's disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1915-1925.
9. Gourtsoyiannis NC, Papanikolaou N, Karantanas A: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of small intestinal Crohn's disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20:137-156.
10. Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, Lanciotti S, Bertini L, Gualdi G: Assessment of Crohn's disease in the small bowel: prospective comparison of magnetic resonance enteroclysis with conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2817-2827.
11. Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, Gualdi F: Comparison of MR enteroclysis with MR enterography and conventional enteroclysis in patients with Crohn's disease. Eur Radiol 2008;18:438-447.
12. Low RN, Francis IR, Politoske D, Bennett M: Crohn's disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and singlephase helical CT scanning. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:127-135.
13. Pilleul F, Godefroy C, Yzebe-Beziat D, Dugougeat-Pilleul F, Lachaux A, Valette PJ: Magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn's disease. Gastroentrol Clin Biol 2005;29:803-808.
14. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos P: MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2651-2658. (Pubitemid 36940374)
15. Hoffmann JC, Preiss JC, Autschbach F, et al: Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of Crohn's disease. Z Gastroenterol 2008;46:1094-1146.
16. Reiter P, Goritschnig T, Petritsch W, et al: Multiplanar spiral CT enterography in patients with Crohn's disese using a negative oral contrast material: initial results of a noninvasive imaging approach. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2253-2257.
17. Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ: Assessment of small bowel Crohn's disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy - feasibility study. Radiology 2003;229:275-281.
18. Schmidt S, Lepori D, Meuwly JY, et al: Prospective comparison of MR-enteroclysis (MRE) with multidetector-spiral-CT-enteroclysis (MSCTE) Eur Radiol 2003;13:1303-1311.
19. Maglinte D D T, Gourtsoyiannis N, Rex D, Howard TH, Kelvin FM: Classification of small bowel Crohn's subtypes based on multimodality imaging. Radiol Clin N Am 2003;41:285-303.
20. Fleiss JL: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, Wiley, 1985.
21. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H: Small bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 2000;215:717-725.
22. Rieber A, Aschoff A, Nüssle K, et al: MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1377-1382.
23. Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Bennink RJ, Stoker J: Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Radiology 2008;247:64-79.
24. Herfarth HH, Grunert M, Klebl F, et al: Frequency and nature of incidental extra-enteric lesions found on magnetic resonance enterography (MR-E) in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). PLoS One 2009;4: e4863.
25. Negaard A, Sandvik L, Berstad AE, et al: MRI of the small bowel with oral contrast or nasojejunal intubation in Crohn's disease: randomized comparison of patient's acceptance. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008;43:44-51.
26. Lee SS, Kim AY, Yang S-K, et al: Crohn disease of the small bowel: Comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and smallbowel follow-through as diagnostic techniques. Radiology 2009;251:751-761.
27. Siddiki HA, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, et al: Prospective comparison of state-of-the art MR enterography and CT enterography in smallbowel Crohn's disease. AJR 2009;193:113-121.
28. Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L, et al: A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn's disease, the oral contrast method and enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2294-2301.
29. Sinha R, Rajiah P, Murphy P, Hawker P, Sanders S: Utility of high-resolution MR imaging in demonstrating transmural pathologic changes in Crohn disease. Radiographics 2009:1847-1867.
30. Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Bessoud B et al: Diagnostic performance of MRI for detection of intestinal fistulas in patients with complicated inflammatory bowel conditions. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2957-2963.