Event extraction for systems biology by text mining the literature

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 381-390

  Ananiadou, Sophia ^a   Pyysalo, Sampo ^b   Tsujii, Jun'ichi ^a,b   Kell, Douglas B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS; DISEASE STATE; DOWNSTREAM EFFECTS; EVENT EXTRACTION; HIGHER ORDER; OR-NETWORKS; PHYSIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TEXT MINING;

MINING;

PROTEINS;

AUTOMATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW;

DATA MINING; DOCUMENTATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PUBMED; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 77953917404     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.04.005     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Klipp E., et al. Systems Biology in Practice: Concepts, Implementation and Clinical Application 2005, Wiley-VCH.
2. Alon U. An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits 2006, Chapman and Hall.
3. Palsson B.Ø. Systems Biology: Properties of Reconstructed Networks 2006, Cambridge University Press.
4. Ananiadou S., Nenadic G. Automatic terminology management in biomedicine. Text Mining for Biology and Biomedicine 2006, Artech House Books. S. Ananiadou, J. McNaught (Eds.).
5. Okazaki N., Ananiadou S. Building an abbreviation dictionary using a term recognition approach. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:3089-3095.
6. Tsuruoka Y., et al. Normalizing biomedical terms by minimizing ambiguity and variability. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(S-3):S2.
7. Gaudan S., et al. Resolving abbreviations to their senses in Medline. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:3658-3664.
8. Wang X., et al. Disambiguating the species of biomedical named entities using natural language parsers. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:661-667.
9. Text Mining for Biology and Biomedicine 2006, Artech House Books. S. Ananiadou, J. McNaught (Eds.).
10. Ananiadou S., et al. Text mining and its potential applications in systems biology. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24:571-579.
11. Rzhetsky A., et al. Getting started in text mining: part two. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000411.
12. Torii M., et al. A comparison study on algorithms of detecting long forms for short forms in biomedical text. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8(Suppl 9):S5.
13. Ananiadou, S. et al. eds (2004) Special Issue on Named Entity Recognition in Biomedicine. J. Biomed. Inform. 37, 393-528.
14. Cohen K.B., et al. Nominalization and alternations in biomedical language. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3158.
15. Tsuruoka Y., et al. FACTA: a text search engine for finding associated biomedical concepts. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2559-2560.
16. Chun H.W., et al. Extraction of gene-disease relations from Medline using domain dictionaries and machine learning. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2006, 4-15.
17. von Mering C., et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 2002, 417:399-403.
18. Kim J.-D., et al. Overview of BioNLP'09 Shared Task on Event Extraction. BioNLP 2009 Companion Volume: Shared Task on Event Extraction 2009, 1-9. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. Winnenburg R., et al. Facts from text: can text mining help to scale-up high-quality manual curation of gene products with ontologies?. Brief Bioinform. 2008, 9:466-478.
20. Korbel J., et al. Systematic association of genes to phenotypes by genome and literature mining. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e134.
21. Sam L.T., et al. PhenoGO: an integrated resource for the multiscale mining of clinical and biological data. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 2):S8.
22. Ozgur A., et al. Identifying gene-disease associations using centrality on a literature mined gene-interaction network. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:i277-285.
23. Thompson P., et al. Construction of an annotated corpus to support biomedical information extraction. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:349.
24. Miyao Y., et al. Evaluating contributions of natural language parsers to protein-protein interaction extraction. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:394-400.
25. Miyao Y., Tsujii J. Feature forest models for probabilistic HPSG parsing. Comput. Linguist. 2008, 34(1):35-80.
26. Hull D., et al. Defrosting the digital library: bibliographic tools for the next generation web. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008, 4:e1000204.
27. Attwood T.K., et al. Calling International Rescue: knowledge lost in literature and data landslide!. Biochem. J. 2009, 424:317-333.
28. Pettifer S., et al. Visualising biological data: a semantic approach to tool and database integration. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 6):S19.
29. Hoffmann R., Valencia A. Implementing the iHOP concept for navigation of biomedical literature. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(Suppl 2):ii252-258.
30. Dietze H., Schroeder M. GoWeb: a semantic search engine for the life science web. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 10):S7.
31. Fontaine J.F., et al. MedlineRanker: flexible ranking of biomedical literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:W141-146.
32. Miyao Y., et al. Semantic retrieval for the accurate identification of relational concepts in massive textbases. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2006, Vol. 2:1017-1024. Association for Computational Linguistics.
33. Tsuruoka Y., Tsujii J. Improving the performance of dictionary-based approaches in protein name recognition. J. Biomed. Inform. 2004, 37:461-470.
34. Fundel K., et al. RelEx - relation extraction using dependency parse trees. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:365-371.
35. Zweigenbaum P., et al. Frontiers of biomedical text mining: current progress. Brief Bioinform. 2007, 8:358-375.
36. Kim S.H. Kernel approaches for genic interaction extraction. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:118-126.
37. Krallinger M., et al. Overview of the protein-protein interaction annotation extraction task of BioCreative II. Genome Biol. 2008, 9(Suppl 2):S4.
38. Xenarios I., et al. DIP: the Database of Interacting Proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28:289-291.
39. Hermjakob H., et al. IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:D452-455.
40. Ramani A.K., et al. Consolidating the set of known human protein-protein interactions in preparation for large-scale mapping of the human interactome. Genome Biol. 2005, 6:R40.
41. Handbook of Chemoinformatics: From Data to Knowledge 2003, Wiley-VCH. J. Gasteiger (Ed.).
42. Dobson P.D., et al. 'Metabolite-likeness' as a criterion in the design and selection of pharmaceutical drug libraries. Drug Discov. Today 2009, 14:31-40.
43. Hopkins A.L. Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008, 4:682-690.
44. Hucka M., et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:524-531.
45. Kitano H., et al. Using process diagrams for the graphical representation of biological networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23:961-966.
46. Mendes P., et al. Computational modeling of biochemical networks using COPASI. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 500:17-59.
47. Duarte N.C., et al. Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:1777-1782.
48. Spasic I., et al. KiPar, a tool for systematic information retrieval regarding parameters for kinetic modelling of yeast metabolic pathways. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1404-1411.
49. Herrgard M.J., et al. A consensus yeast metabolic network reconstruction obtained from a community approach to systems biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:1155-1160.
50. Oda K., et al. New challenges for text mining: mapping between text and manually curated pathways. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(Suppl 3):S5.
51. Rzhetsky A., et al. GeneWays: a system for extracting, analyzing, visualizing, and integrating molecular pathway data. J. Biomed. Inform. 2004, 37:43-53.
52. Rajagopalan D., Agarwal P. Inferring pathways from gene lists using a literature-derived network of biological relationships. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:788-793.
53. Santos C., et al. Wnt pathway curation using automated natural language processing: combining statistical methods with partial and full parse for knowledge extraction. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:1653-1658.
54. Kelder T., et al. Mining biological pathways using WikiPathways web services. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e6447.
55. Elliott B., et al. PathCase: pathways database system. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2526-2533.
56. Barrell D., et al. The GOA database in 2009 - an integrated gene ontology annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:D396-403.
57. Blaschke C., et al. Evaluation of BioCreAtIvE assessment of task 2. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:S16.
58. Kim J.D., et al. Corpus annotation for mining biomedical events from literature. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:10.
59. Tsuruoka Y., et al. Accelerating the annotation of sparse named entities by dynamic sentence selection. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(Suppl 11):S8.
60. Pyysalo S., et al. BioInfer: a corpus for information extraction in the biomedical domain. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:50.
61. Kim J., et al. GENIA corpus - a semantically annotated corpus for bio-text mining. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(Suppl 1):i180-i182.
62. Miwa M., et al. Event extraction with complex event classification using rich features. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2010, 8:131-146.
63. Divoli A., Attwood T.K. BioIE: extracting informative sentences from the biomedical literature. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:2138-2139.
64. Huang M., et al. Discovering patterns to extract protein-protein interactions from full texts. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:3604-3612.
65. Corney D.P., et al. BioRAT: extracting biological information from full-length papers. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:3206-3213.
66. McNaught J., Black W. Information extraction. Text Mining for Biology and Biomedicine 2006, 143-177. Artech House. S. Ananiadou, J. McNaught (Eds.).
67. McDonald D., et al. Extracting gene pathway relations using a hybrid grammar: the Arizona relation parser. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:3370-3378.
68. Friedman C., et al. Two biomedical sublanguages: a description based on the theories of Zellig Harris. J. Biomed. Inform. 2002, 35:222-235.
69. Harris Z. The structure of science information. J. Biomed. Inform. 2002, 35:215-221.
70. Friedman C., et al. GENIES: a natural-language processing system for the extraction of molecular pathways from journal articles. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:S74-S82.
71. Cimiano P., et al. Ontology-driven discourse analysis for information extraction. Data Knowl. Eng. 2005, 55(1):59-83.
72. Yakushiji A., et al. Event extraction from biomedical papers using a full parser. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2001, 6:408-419.
73. Bunescu R., et al. Comparative experiments on learning information extractors for proteins and their interactions. Artif. Intell. Med. 2005, 33:139-155.
74. Airola A., et al. All-paths graph kernel for protein-protein interaction extraction with evaluation of cross-corpus learning. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:S2.
75. Miwa M., et al. Protein-protein interaction extraction by leveraging multiple kernels and parsers. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2009, 78(12):e39-e46.
76. Krallinger M., et al. Evaluation of text-mining systems for biology: overview of the Second BioCreative community challenge. Genome Biol. 2008, 9(Suppl 2):S1.
77. Kell D.B. Metabolomics, modelling and machine learning in systems biology: towards an understanding of the languages of cells. The 2005 Theodor Bücher Lecture. FEBS J. 2006, 273:873-894.
78. Kell D.B. The virtual human: towards a global systems biology of multiscale, distributed biochemical network models. IUBMB Life 2007, 59:689-695.
79. King R.D., et al. The automation of science. Science 2009, 324:85-89.
80. Weeber M., et al. Generating hypotheses by discovering implicit associations in the literature: a case report of a search for new potential therapeutic uses for thalidomide. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003, 10:252-259.
81. Kell D., Oliver S. Here is the evidence, now what is the hypothesis? The complementary roles of inductive and hypothesis-driven science in the post-genomic era. BioEssays 2004, 26:99-105.
82. Spasic I., et al. Text mining and ontologies in biomedicine: making sense of raw text. Brief Bioinform. 2005, 6:239-251.
83. Kell D.B. Iron behaving badly: inappropriate iron chelation as a major contributor to the aetiology of vascular and other progressive inflammatory and degenerative diseases. BMC Med. Genomics 2009, 2:2.
84. Dobson P.D., Kell D.B. Carrier-mediated cellular uptake of pharmaceutical drugs: an exception or the rule? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7:205-220.