Population genetics of the threatened tree daisy olearia gardneri (asteraceae), conservation of a critically endangered species

Conservation Genetics

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1515-1522

  Barnaud, A ^a,b   Houliston, G J ^a  

^a LANDCARE RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

AFLP; Genetic structure; Olearia sp.; Parentage analysis; Reintroduction

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION GENETICS; DICOTYLEDON; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; PARENTAGE; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION SIZE; REINTRODUCTION; REVEGETATION; SURVIVAL;

NEW ZEALAND;

ASTERACEAE; MONTANOA HIBISCIFOLIA; OLEARIA; OLEARIA GARDNERI;

EID: 77953915805     PISSN: 15660621     EISSN: 15729737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-009-9981-2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bonin A, Ehrich D, Manel S (2004) Statistical analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data: a toolbox for molecular ecologists and evolutionists. Mol Ecol 16: 3737-3758.
2. Broadhurst LM, Young AG, Murry BG (2008) AFLPs reveal an absence of geographical genetic structure among remnant populations of pohutukawa (Metrosideros excelsa, Myrtaceae). N Z J Bot 46: 13-21.
3. de Lange PJ, Norton DA, Courtney SP et al (2009) New Zealand extinct, threatened and at risk vascular plant list. N Z J Bot 47: 61-96.
4. de Nettancourt D (1977) Incompatibility in angiosperms. Sex Plant Reprod 10: 185-199.
5. DeSalle R (2005) Genetics at the brink of extinction. Heredity 94: 386-387.
6. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 24: 217-242.
7. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation Study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611-2620.
8. Forest F, Grenyer R, Rouget M et al (2007) Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 445: 757-760.
9. Frankham R (2003) Genetics and conservation biology. C R Biol 326(1): S22-S29.
10. Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Cons 126: 131-140.
11. Frankham R, Lees K, Montgomery ME et al (1999) Do population size bottlenecks reduce evolutionary potential? Anim Conserv 2: 255-260.
12. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Gerber S, Mariette S, Streiff R et al (2000) Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Mol Ecol 9: 1037-1048.
14. Gerber S, Chabrier P, Kremer A (2003) FAMOZ: a software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uniparentally inherited markers. Mol Ecol Notes 3: 479-481.
15. Haase P (1992a) Isozyme variation and genetic relationships in Phyllocladus trichomanoides and P. alpinus (Podocarpaceae). N Z J Bot 30: 359-363.
16. Haase P (1992b) Isozyme variability and biogeography of Nothofagus truncata (Fagaceae). N Z J Bot 30: 315-328.
17. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1995) Conservation genetics of endemic species. In: Avise JC, Hamrick JL (eds) Conservation genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 281-304.
18. Hawkins BJ, Sweet GB (1989) Genetic variation in rimu-an investigation using isozyme analysis. N Z J Bot 27: 83-90.
19. Heenan PB, Smissen RD, Dawson MI (2005) Self-incompatibility in the threatened shrub Olearia adenocarpa (Asteraceae). N Z J Bot 43: 831-841.
20. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB et al (2008) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.
21. Mba C, Tohme J (2005) Use of AFLP markers in surveys of plant diversity. Methods Enzymol 395: 177-201.
22. Meudt HM, Clarke AC (2007) Almost forgotten or latest practice? AFLP applications, analyses and advances. Trends Plant Sci 12: 106-117.
23. Moritz C (2002) Strategies to protect biological diversity and evolutionary processes that sustain IT. Syst Biol 51: 238-252.
24. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70: 3321-3323.
25. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygoisty and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
26. Ogle CC (2003) Conservation of Olearia gardneri. Report for the small leaved daisy recovery group. DOC Science Internal Series 156.
27. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) Genales 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288-295.
28. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
29. Rogers GM (1996) Aspects of the ecology and conservation of the threatened tree daisy Olearia hectorii in New Zealand. NZ J Bot 34: 227-240.
30. Smouse PE, Long JC (1992) Matrix correlation analysis in anthropology and genetics. Yearb Phys Anthropol 35: 187-213.
31. Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR (1986) Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst Zool 35: 627-632.
32. Sokal RR, Michener CD (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kansas Sci Bull 38: 1409-1438.
33. Spielman D, Brook BW, Frankham R (2004) Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 15261-15264.
34. Vekemans XT, Beauwens M, Lemaire I et al (2002) Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol Ecol 11: 139-151.
35. Whittaker RJ (1998) Scale, succession and complexity in island biogeography: are we asking the right questions? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 9: 75-85.
36. Young AG, Schmidt-Adam G, Muarry BG (2001) Genetic variation and structure of remnants stands of pohutukawa (Metrosiderous excelsa, Myrtaceae). N Z J Bot 39: 133-140.