Characterization of human-dog social interaction using owner report

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 721-725

  Lit, Lisa ^a,b   Schweitzer, Julie B ^b   Oberbauer, Anita M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Dogs genetics; Dogs psychology; Humans; Species specificity

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CANID; COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; GENETICS; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VOCALIZATION;

AGE; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BREED DIFFERENCE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; FEMALE; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATION; RECOGNITION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALS; COMMUNICATION; DATA COLLECTION; DOGS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 77953913464     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson J.R., Sallaberry P., Barbier H. Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by capuchin monkeys. Anim. Behav. 1995, 49:201-208.
2. Brauer J., Kaminski J., Riedel J., Call J., Tomasello M. Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. J. Comp. Psychol. 2006, 120:38-47.
3. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16:297-334.
4. Cronbach L.J., Meehl P.E. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 1955, 52:281-302.
5. Dorey N.R., Udell M.A.R., Wynne C.D.L. Breed differences in dogs sensitivity to human points: a meta-analysis. Behav. Process. 2009, 81:409-415.
6. Erdohegyi Á., Topál J., Virányi Z., Miklósi Á. Dog-logic: inferential reasoning in a two-way choice task and its restricted use. Anim. Behav. 2007, 74:725-737.
7. Gacsi M., Gyoori B., Viranyi Z., Kubinyi E., Range F., Belenyi B., Miklosi A. Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e6584.
8. Gacsi M., McGreevy P., Kara E., Miklosi A. Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs. Behav. Brain Funct. 2009, 5:31.
9. Gosling S.D., Kwan V.S., John O.P. A dog's got personality: a cross-species comparative approach to personality judgments in dogs and humans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 85:1161-1169.
10. Guttman L. Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika 1954, 19:149-161.
11. Helton W.S. Cephalic index and perceived dog trainability. Behav. Process. 2009, 82:355-358.
12. Helton W.S. Does perceived trainability of dog (Canis lupus familiaris) breeds reflect differences in learning or differences in physical ability?. Behav. Process. 2010, 83:315-323.
13. Kaiser H.F. A note on Guttman lower bound for the number of common factors. Br. J. Stat. Psychol. 1961, 14:1-2.
14. Kaminski J., Call J., Fischer J. Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for "fast mapping"Science 2004, 304:1682-1683.
15. Kubinyi E., Turcsan B., Miklosi A. Dog and owner demographic characteristics and dog personality trait associations. Behav. Process. 2009, 81:392-401.
16. Lit L., Schweitzer J., Iosif A.M., Oberbauer A. Owner reports of attention, activity, and impulsivity in dogs: a replication study. Behav. Brain Funct. 2010, 6:1.
17. Lord C., Rutter M., DiLavore P.C., Risi S. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule 2002, Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles.
18. Lord C., Rutter M., Goode S., Heemsbergen J., Jordan H., Mawhood L., Schopler E. Autism diagnostic observation schedule: a standardized observation of communicative and social behavior. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 1989, 19:185-212.
19. McKinley S., Young R.J. The efficacy of the model-rival method when compared with operant conditioning for training domestic dogs to perform a retrieval-selection task. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 81:357-365.
20. Miklosi A., Topal J., Csanyi V. Big thoughts in small brains? Dogs as a model for understanding human social cognition. Neuroreport 2007, 18:467-471.
21. Parker H.G., Ostrander E.A. Canine genomics and genetics: running with the pack. PLoS Genet. 2005, 1:e58.
22. Pongracz P., Miklosi A., Timar-Geng K., Csanyi V. Verbal attention getting as a key factor in social learning between dog (Canis familiaris) and human. J. Comp. Psychol. 2004, 118:375-383.
23. Reid P.J. Adapting to the human world: Dogs' responsiveness to our social cues. Behav. Process. 2009, 80:325-333.
24. Topal J., Gergely G., Erdohegyi A., Csibra G., Miklosi A. Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science 2009, 325:1269-1272.
25. Vas J., Topal J., Pech E., Miklosi A. Measuring attention deficit and activity in dogs: a new application and validation of a human ADHD questionnaire. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 103:105-117.
26. Viranyi Z., Gacsi M., Kubinyi E., Topal J., Belenyi B., Ujfalussy D., Miklosi A. Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim. Cogn. 2008, 11:373-387.
27. Wynne C.D.L., Udell M.A.R., Lord K.A. Ontogeny's impacts on human-dog communication. Anim. Behav. 2008, 76:E1-E4.