A comparison of test methods for the measurement of hydrogen sensor response and recovery times

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 35, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 7652-7663

  Boon Brett, L ^a   Black, G ^a   Moretto, P ^a   Bousek, J ^a  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Hydrogen detection; Hydrogen sensor; Recovery time; Response time; Safety; Test methods

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION RANGES; FLOW-BASED METHODS; HYDROGEN DETECTION; HYDROGEN SAFETY SENSORS; HYDROGEN SENSOR; RECOVERY TIME; RESPONSE TIME; SAFETY TESTS; SENSOR RESPONSE; TEST METHOD;

HYDROGEN; RECOVERY;

SENSORS;

EID: 77953912555     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.139     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Salyk O., Castello P., and Harskamp F. A facility for characterization and testing of hydrogen sensors. Meas Sci Technol 17 (2006) 3033-3041
2. Castello P., and Salyk O. Characterization and application of a facility for independent customer testing of hydrogen sensors. Int Sci J Alternative Energy Ecology 5 37 (2006) 61-62
3. Castello P, Salyk O. Testing of hydrogen safety sensors in service simulated conditions. International conference on hydrogen. Pisa, Italy; September 8-10; 2005.
4. Salyk O., and Castello P. Hydrogen sensors in systems for alternative fuels. Chem Listy 99 (2005) 116-119
5. Boon-Brett L., Bousek J., Castello P., Salyk O., Harskamp F., Aldea L., et al. Reliability of commercially available hydrogen sensors for detection of hydrogen at critical concentrations: part I - testing facility and methodologies. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33 24 (2008) 7648-7657
6. Boon-Brett L., Bousek J., and Moretto P. Reliability of commercially available hydrogen sensors for detection of hydrogen at critical concentrations: part II - selected sensor test results. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34 1 (2009) 562-571
7. StorHy - Hydrogen storage systems for automotive application: Integrated Project Number 502667, Final report on sensor testing, Deliverable DSA10, http://www.storhy.net/
8. Ménil F., Susbielles M., Debéda H., Lucat C., and Tardy P. Evidence of a correlation between the non-linearity of chemical sensors and the asymmetry of their response and recovery curves. Sensors Actuators B: Chem 106 (2005) 407-423
9. Ménil F. Modélisation des temps de réponse des capteurs chimiques. CR Acad Sci Paris Chimie 4 (2001) 899-905
10. Gerblinger J., and Meixner H. Fast oxygen sensors based on sputtered strontium titanate. Sensors Actuators B: Chem 4 (1991) 99-102
11. Tobias P., Mårtensson P., Göras A., Lundström I., and Lloyd Spetz A. Moving gas outlets for the evaluation of fast gas sensors. Sensors Actuators B: Chem (1999) 58389-58393
12. Wingbrant H., Lundström I., and Lloyd Spetz A. The speed of response of MISiCFET devices. Sensors and Actuators B: Chem 93 (2003) 286-294
13. IEC 60079-29-1 Electrical apparatus for the detection and measurement of flammable gases - part 1: general requirements and test methods; 1998.
14. Sawaguchi N., Nishibori M., Tajima K., Shin W., Izu N., Murayama N., et al. Practical test methods for hydrogen gas sensor response characterization. Electrochemistry 74 (2006) 315-320
15. ISO FDIS 26142 Hydrogen detection apparatus; 2009.
16. Boon-Brett L., Bousek J., Black G., Frischauf N., Harskamp F., and Moretto P. Hydrogen sensor response and recovery time measurement methods. Private EC-JRC report to members of ISO TC197 WG 13 (6 March 2009)
17. Private communication (email) from MOSFET manufacturer dated 06/05/2009.