A META‐ANALYSIS OF SELF‐SUPERVISOR, SELF‐PEER, AND PEER‐SUPERVISOR RATINGS

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1988, Pages 43-62

  HARRIS, MICHAEL M ^a   SCHAUBROECK, JOHN ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953912110     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: 17446570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00631.x     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Self and supervior ratings of performance: As related to self‐esteem and satisfaction with supervision
2. The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach
3. Attribution theory: A meta‐analysis of attributional hypotheses
4. The influence of subordinate age on performance ratings and causal attributions
5. Comparisons of self‐ and superior ratings of managerial performance
6. The relationship between supervisory ratings and results‐oriented measures of performance: A meta‐analysis
7. Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior‐, self‐, and peer ratings
8. Limits in generalization from psychological research to performance appraisal processes
9. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior
10. Effects of threat in a performance appraisal interview
11. Role of the rater in performance appraisal
12. A meta‐analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings
13. Performance rating
14. Behaviorally anchored scales for rating the performance of police officers
15. The multitrait‐multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance
16. Validity of self‐evaluation of ability: A review and meta‐analysis
17. Accuracy of performance ratings as affected by rater training and perceived purpose of rating
18. Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations
19. The self‐rating as a measure of employee satisfactoriness
20. The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results
21. Commentary on forty questions about validity generalizationa and meta‐analysis
22. Current issues in personnel selection
23. Training programs for performance appraisal: A review
24. Ratings of candidates for promotion by co‐workers and supervisors
25. Self‐appraisal based upon supervisory feedback
26. Psychometric properties of self‐appraisals of job performance
27. Prediction of creativity and other performance measures from biographical information among pharmaceutical scientists
28. Performance appraisal: An update
29. Relationship between measures of effort and performance
30. Organization and rater differences in performance appraisals
31. Nursing performance as measured by behavioral expectations scales: A multitrait‐multirater analysis
32. Performance decision as a function of purpose of rating and training
33. Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception
34. Self and superior ratings of performance: As relate'd to self‐esteem and satisfaction with supervision
35. An assessment of faculty performance: Some correlates between administrator, colleague, student, and self ratings
36. A closer look at peer ratings
37. The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternative approach
38. Alternative methods of analysis: Multitrait‐multimethod data
39. Moderators of the relationships between self and superior evaluations of job performance
40. Supervisors' and subordinates' communication experiences in managing job performance: Two blind men describing an elephant
41. Colleagues as raters of classroom instruction
42. Student, peer, and self evaluations of college instructors
43. Self‐perceived task‐relevant abilities, rated job performance, and complaining behavior of junior employees in a government ministry
44. The influence of subordinate age on performance ratings and causal attributions
45. Variability across sources of performance ratings
46. Correspondence between personality trait ratings and behavior events
47. The accuracy and correlates of psychiatric patients' self‐assessment of their work behavior
48. Criterion measures for extremely isolated groups
49. Comparisons of self‐ and superior ratings of managerial performance
50. An objective peer evaluation scale: Construction and validity
51. Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self, and peer ratings
52. Supervisor and subordinate reactions to performance appraisal sessions
53. Scaling peer ratings: An examination of the differential validities of positive and negative nominations
54. Effects of threat in a performance appraisal interview
55. Halo in multi‐dimensional forced‐choice performance evaluation scale
56. Relationships between supervisory and subordinate ratings for technical personnel
57. Role of the rater in performance appraisal
58. Prediction of managerial success by peer and training staff ratings
59. Use of sociometric peer nominations in medical education research
60. The multitrait‐multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance
61. Self‐assessment in personnel selection
62. Comparison of peer assessment methods: Reliability, validity, friendship bias, and user reaction
63. College teaching ability, scholarly activity and personality
64. An assessment of the accuracy of self‐assessment for career decision making
65. Expectancy theory predictions of the satisfaction, effort, performance, and retention of naval aviation officers
66. Relationship between self‐rated performance and pay satisfaction among sales representatives
67. Supervisor, self, and subordinate ratings of performance and satisfaction with supervision
68. A multitrait‐multimethod analysis of predictors and criteria of nursing performance
69. Effects of race of rater and ratee on peer‐ratings of managerial potential
70. Rating scale content: III. Relationship between supervisor and self‐ratings
71. Assessments of higher‐level personnel: III. Rating criteria: A comparative analysis of supervisor ratings and incumbent ratings of job performance
72. The self‐rating as a measure of employee satisfactoriness
73. Behavior, situation, and rater variance in descriptions of leader behaviors
74. The influence of role prescriptions on the performance appraisal process
75. Are self‐appraisals more realistic among professionals or nonprofessionals in health care
76. Effects of gender on self‐ and supervisory ratings
77. Self‐evaluation and reactions to evaluations from others
78. Paired comparison evaluations of managerial effectiveness by peers and supervisors
79. Supervisors' and subordinates' perceptions of performance: Beyond disagreement
80. Ratings of candidates for promotion by co‐workers and supervisors
81. Self‐appraisal based upon supervisory feedback
82. The relationship between supervisory and self‐appraisals of executive performance
83. Prediction of creativity and other performance measures from biographical information among pharmaceutical scientists
84. Student, supervisor and self‐ratings of instructional proficiency
85. Relationship between measures of effort and job performance