Discovering the stable clusters between interestingness measures

ICEIS 2006 - 8th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Proceedings

Volumn AIDSS, Issue , 2006, Pages 196-201

  Huynh, Xuan Hiep ^a   Guillet, Fabrice ^a   Briand, Henri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Association rules; Interestingness measure; Knowledge quality; Post processing; Stable cluster

Indexed keywords

DATA MINERS; DATA SETS; INTERESTINGNESS MEASURES; POST PROCESSING; STABLE CLUSTERS;

ASSOCIATION RULES; ASSOCIATIVE PROCESSING;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 77953908977     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Agrawal, R., Mannila, H., Srikant, R., Toivonen, H., and Verkano, A. (1996). Fast discovery of association rules. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AAAI/MIT Press.
2. Blanchard, J., Guillet, F., Gras, R., and Briand, H. (2005a). Assessing rule interestingness with a probabilistic measure of deviation from equilibrium. In ASMDA'05, Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis.
3. Blanchard, J., Guillet, F., Gras, R., and Briand, H. (2005b). Using information-theoretic measures to assess association rule interestingness. In ICDM'05, Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.
4. Blanchard, J., Kuntz, P., Guillet, F., and Gras, R. (2003). Implication intensity: from the basic statistical definition to the entropic version (Chap. 28). In Statistical Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.
5. Carvalho, D. R., Freitas, A. A., and Ebecken, N. F. F. (2003). A critical review of rule surprisingness measures. In Proceedings of Data Mining IV - International Confeference on Data Mining.
6. Carvalho, D. R., Freitas, A. A., and Ebecken, N. F. F. (2005). Evaluating the correlation between objective rule interestingness measures and real human interest. In PKDD'05, the 9th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases.
7. Choi, D. H., Ahn, B. S., and Kim, S. H. (2005). Prioritization of association rules in data mining: Multiple criteria decision approach. In ESA'05, Expert Sytems with Applications.
8. Freitas, A. (1999). On rule interestingness measures. In Knowledge-Based Systems, 12(5-6). Elsevier.
9. Gavrilov, M., Anguelov, D., Indyk, P., and Motwani, R. (2000). Mining the stock market: which measure is best? In KDD'00, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
10. Gras, R., Briand, H., Peter, P., and Philippé, J. (1996). Implicative statistical analysis. In IFCS'96, Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Federation of Classification Societies. Springer-Verlag.
11. Hilderman, R. and Hamilton, H. (2001). Knowledge Discovery and Measures of Interestingness. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Huynh, X.-H., Guillet, F., and Briand, H. (2005). Clustering interestingness measures with positive correlation. In ICEIS'05, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems.
13. Kaufman, L. and Rousseeuw, P. (1990). Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Wiley.
14. Klösgen,W. (1996). Explora: a multipattern and multistrategy discovery assistant. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. AAAI/MIT Press.
15. Major, J. and Magano, J. (1995). Selecting among rules induced from a hurricane database. In Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 4(1).
16. Newman, D., Hettich, S., Blake, C., and Merz, C. (1998). [UCI] Repository of machine learning databases, http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository. html. University of California, Irvine, Dept. of Information and Computer Sciences.
17. Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. (1991). Discovery, analysis and presentation of strong rules. In Knowledge Discovery in Databases. MIT Press.
18. Ross, S. (1987). Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. Wiley.
19. Tan, P.-N., Kumar, V., and Srivastava, J. (2004). Selecting the right objective measure for association analysis. In Information Systems 29(4). Elsevier.