An efficient data gathering scheme using a chaotic PCNN in wireless sensornetworks with multiple sink nodes

ICIC Express Letters

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 805-811

  Nakano, Hidehiro ^a   Utani, Akihide ^a   Miyauchi, Arata ^a   Yamamoto, Hisao ^a  

^a TOKYO CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Chaos; Data gathering; Pulse coupledneural networks; Synchronization; Wireless sensor networks

Indexed keywords

CHAOS; CHAOS SYNCHRONIZATION; CHAOTIC PULSE; DATA GATHERING; DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL; LOW ENERGY CONSUMPTION; SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS; SINK NODES; WIRELESS SENSOR NODE;

CHAOS THEORY; ELECTRIC NETWORK SYNTHESIS; SENSOR NETWORKS; SENSOR NODES; SYNCHRONIZATION; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS;

EID: 77953885087     PISSN: 1881803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. D. Subramanian, P. Druschel and J. Chen, Ants and reinforcement learning:A case study in routing in dynamic networks, Technical Report TR96-259, RiceUniversity, 1998.
2. S. Marwaha, C. K. Tham and D. Srinivasan, A novel routing protocol usingmobile agents and reactive route discovery for ad hoc wireless networks, Proc.of the IEEE International Conference on Networks, pp. 311-316, 2002.
3. G. D. Caro, F. Ducatelle and L. M. Gambardella, AntHocNet: An ant-basedhybrid routing algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks, Proc. of the 8thInternational Conference on Parallel Problem, Solving from, Nature, pp. 461-470,2004.
4. Y. Ohtaki, N. Wakamiya, M. Murata and M. Imase, Scalable and efficientant-based routing algorithm for ad-hoc networks, IEICE Trans. Commun., E89-B,No. 4, 1231-1238, 2006.
5. D. B. Johnson, D. A. Maltz, Y. C. Hu and J. G. Jetcheva, The dynamicsource routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks, IETF Internet Draft,draft-ietf-manet-dsr-09.txt, 2003.
6. C. E. Perkins and E. M. Royer, Ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing,Proc. of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pp.90-100, 1999.
7. T. Clausen, and P. Jaquet, Optimized link state routing protocol, Requestfor Comments, Vol. 3626, 2003.
8. R. Ogier, M. Lewis and F. Templin, Topology dissemination based onreverse-path forwarding (TBRPF), IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-tbrpf- 10.txt, 2003.
9. W. R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, Energy-efficientcommunication protocol for wireless microsensor networks, Proc. of the HawaiiInternational Conference on System, Sciences, pp. 3005-3014, 2000.
10. K. Dasgupta, K. Kalpakis and P. Namjoshi, An efficient clustering-basedheuristic for data gathering and aggregation in sensor networks, Proc. of theIEEE Wireless Communications and, Networking Conference, pp. 16-20, 2003.
11. N. Wakamiya, and M. Murata, Synchronization-based data gathering schemefor sensor networks, IEICE Trans. Communications, E88-B, No. 3, pp. 873-881,2005.
12. R. E. Mirollo and S. H. Strogatz, Synchronization of pulse- coupledbiological oscillators, SIAM J. Appl. Math., Vol. 50, pp. 1645-1662, 1990.
13. E. Catsigeras, and R. Budelli, Limit cycles of a bineuronal networkmodel, Physica D, 56, 235-252, 1992.
14. H. Nakano, and T. Saito, Basic dynamics from a pulse-coupled network ofautonomous integrate-and-fire chaotic circuits, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks,Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 92-100, 2002. (Pubitemid 34236840)
15. H. Nakano, and T. Saito, Grouping Synchronization in a Pulse-CoupledNetwork of Chaotic Spiking Oscillators, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, Vol. 15,No. 5, pp. 1018-1026, 2004.
16. H. Nakano, A. Utani, A. Miyauchi and H. Yamamoto, Data gathering schemeUsing chaotic pulsecoupled neural networks for wireless sensor networks, IEICETrans. Funds., E92-A, No. 2, pp. 459-466, 2009.