A Bayesian network approach to assess and predict software quality using activity-based quality models

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Wagner, Stefan ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

activity based quality models; Bayesian networks; quality assessment; quality prediction

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY-BASED; BREAK DOWN; PROOF OF CONCEPT; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; QUALITY MODELS; QUALITY PREDICTION; SOFTWARE QUALITY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; FORECASTING; INFERENCE ENGINES; INTELLIGENT NETWORKS; MODELS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 77953868793     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1540438.1540447     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. S. Amasaki, Y. Takagi, O. Mizuno, and T. Kikuno. Constructing a Bayesian Belief Network to Predict Final Quality in Embedded System Development. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E88-D(6):1134-1141, 2005.
2. V. R. Basili, G. Caldiera, and H. D. Rombach. Goal question metric paradigm. In J. C. Marciniak, editor, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, volume 1. John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
3. J. M. Beaver. A life cycle software quality model using bayesian belief networks. PhD thesis, University of Central Florida, 2006.
4. J. M. Beaver, G. A. Schiavone, and J. S. Berrios. Predicting software suitability using a bayesian belief network. In Proc. Fourth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, pages 82-88. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
5. F. Deissenboeck, E. Juergens, K. Lochmann, and S. Wagner. Software quality models: Purposes, usage scenarios and requirements. In Proc. 7th International Workshop on Software Quality (WoSQ '09). IEEE Computer Society, 2009.
6. F. Deissenboeck, S. Wagner, M. Pizka, S. Teuchert, and J.-F. Girard. An activity-based quality model for maintainability. In Proc. 23rd International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM '07). IEEE Computer Society Press, 2007.
7. N. Fenton and M. Neil. Managing risk in the modern world. Applications of Bayesian networks. Knowledge transfer report, London Mathematical Society, 2007.
8. N. E. Fenton and M. Neil. A critique of software defect prediction models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25(5):675-689, 1999.
9. N. E. Fenton, M. Neil, and J. G. Caballero. Using ranked nodes to model qualitative judgments in Bayesian networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19(10):1420-1432, 2007.
10. ISO 9126-1. Software engineering - Product quality - Part 1: Quality model, 2001.
11. B. Kitchenham and S. L. Peeger. Software quality: The elusive target. IEEE Software, 13(1):12-21, 1996.
12. NASA IV&V Facility. Metrics data program. http://mdp.ivv.nasa.gov/.
13. M. Neil, B. Littlewood, and N. Fenton. Applying bayesian belief networks to systems dependability assessment. Safety Critical Systems Club Newsletter, 8(3), 1999.
14. E. Perez-Minana and J. Gras. Improving fault prediction using Bayesian networks for the development of embedded software applications. Software Testing Verification and Reliability, 16(3):157, 2006.
15. S. Wagner. A literature survey of the quality economics of defect-detection techniques. In Proc. 5th ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE '06). ACM Press, 2006.
16. S. Wagner and F. Deissenboeck. An integrated approach to quality modelling. In Proc. 5th International Workshop on Software Quality (5-WoSQ). IEEE Computer Society Press, 2007.
17. S. Winter, S. Wagner, and F. Deissenboeck. A comprehensive model of usability. In Proc. Engineering Interactive Systems 2007, volume 4940 of LNCS, pages 106-122. Springer-Verlag, 2008.