Special issue: Quality in laboratory diagnostics: From theory to practice quality in the analytical phase

Biochemia Medica

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 147-153

  Sonntag, Oswald ^a  

^a Ortho Clinical Diagnostics GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Analytical errors; Calibration; Clinical laboratory; Drug interference; Paraprotein; Patient safety; Quality control; Reference interval

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; PARAPROTEIN;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; CALIBRATION; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; PATIENT SAFETY; REFERENCE VALUE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SAMPLING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 77953865212     PISSN: 13300962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001.
2. Guder WG, Naraya nan S, Wisser H, Zawta B. Samples: From the Patient to the Laboratory. 3rd rev. ed. Wein heim: Wiley-VCH; 2003. p. 6-7.
3. Harris EK, Wong ET, Shaw St jr. Statistical criteria for separate reference intervals: race and gender groups in creatine kinase. Clin Chem 1991;37:1580-1582
4. Tsianos EB, Jalali MT, Gowen lock AH, Braganza JM. Ethic "hype ramylasaemia": clarification by isoamylase analysis. Clin Chim Acta 1982;124:13-21.
5. Sonntag O. Is this normal? - This is normal! Implication and interpretation of the socalled normal value. J Lab Med 2003;27:302-310
6. Benson ES. The concept of normal range. Hum Pathol 1972; 3:152-155
7. Frier BM, Steer CR, Bai rd JD, Bloom field S. Misleading plasma electrlytes in diabetic children wi th severe hyperlipidaemia. Arch Dis Childh 1980;55:771-775
8. Waugh WH. Utility of expres sing serum sodium per unit of water in assessing hyponatremia. Metab 1969;18:706-712
9. Lyon AW, Baskin LB. Pseu do hyponatremia in a myeloma patient: direct electro de potentiometry is a method worth its salt. Lab med 2003;34:357-360
10. Yang Y, Howanitz PJ, Howanitz JH, Gorfajn H, Wong K. Paraproteins are a com mon cause of interferences with automated chemistry methods. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008; 132:217-223
11. Zaman Z, Sneye rs L, van Or shoven A, Blanckaert N, Marien G. Elimination of paraprotein interference in determination of plasma inorganic phos phate by ammonium molybdate method. Clin Chem 1995;41:609-614
12. Sonntag O. Dry chemis try, 1993, El sevier, Amsterdam-London-New York-Tokyo.
13. NIST. The impact of calibra tion error in medical decision making. NIST report 04-11 2004,
14. th ed, vol.1 + 2, Apoteksbola get AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
15. th ed., vol 1 + 2, AACC press, Washington, USA.
16. Fried man RB, Young DS, Beatty ES. Automated monitoring of drug-test interactions. Clin Pharm Ther 1978;24:16-21.
17. Kailajär vi M, Takala T, Grönroos P, Trydi ng N, Viikari J, Irjala K, Forsström J. Reminders of drug effects on laboratory test results. Clin Chem 2000;46:1395-1400
18. Martin son BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 2005;435:737-738.