An algorithm for the automatic transformation of ontology axioms into a rule model

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 285, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Olegas, Vasilecas ^a   Bugaite, Diana ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Automatic transformation; Axiom; Conceptual model; Ontology; Rule

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC TRANSFORMATIONS; AXIOM; CONCEPTUAL DATA MODELS; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; CONCEPTUAL MODELLING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT; INTEGRAL PART; ONTOLOGY-BASED; SEMANTIC CONTENT;

COST REDUCTION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; METADATA; MODELS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 77953858747     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1330598.1330610     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Jarrar, M., J. Demey, R. Meersman. On Using Conceptual Data Modeling for Ontology Engineering. In Spaccapietra, S., et al. (eds.): Journal on Data Semantics. Springer, 2003, LNCS 2800, pp. 185-207.
2. Guarino, N. Formal Ontology and Information Systems. In Proc. of FOIS'98, Trento, Italy, 6-8 June, 1998. Amsterdam, IOS Press, pp. 3-15.
3. Wand, Y., V.C. Storey, R. Weber. An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), December 1999, vol. 24(4), pp. 494-528.
4. Sugumaran, V., V. C. Storey. The Role of Domain Ontologies in Database Design: An Ontology Management and Conceptual Modeling Environment. ACM transactions on database systems (TODS). ACM Press, 2006, Vol. 31, Issue 3, pp. 1064 - 1094.
5. Herbst, H., et al.: The Specification of Business Rules: A Comparison of Selected Methodologies. In: Verrijn-Stuart, A.A., Olle, T. W. (eds.): Methods and Associated Tools for the Information System Life Cycle. Elsevier, 1994, pp. 29 - 46.
6. Guizzardi, G., H. Herre, G. Wagner. On the General Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modeling. In: Spaccapietra, S., et al (eds.): Proc. of 21th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. Springer-Verlag, 2002, LNCS 2503, pp. 65-78.
7. Business Rules Group: Defining Business Rules ∼ What Are They Really? 3rd edn. Business Rules Group, 2000.
8. von Halle, B. Business Rules Applied: Building Better Systems Using the Business Rules Approach. John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
9. Business Rules Group: The Business Motivation Model. Business Governance in a Volatile World, Business Rules Group (www.BusinessRulesGroup.org), 2005.
10. Valatkaite, I., O. Vasilecas. On Business Rules Approach to the Information Systems Development. In: Linger, H., et al (eds.): Proc. of Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems Development. Constructing the Infrastructure for the Knowledge Economy. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2004, pp. 199-208.
11. Vasilecas, O., D. Bugaite. Ontology-based Information Systems Development: the Problem of Automation of Information Processing Rules. In: Neuhold, E., Yakhno, T. (eds.): Proc. of the Fourth International Conference Advances in Information Systems (ADVIS'2006). Springer, 2006, LNCS 4243, pp. 187-196.
12. Miller, J., Mukerji, J. (eds.): MDA Guide Version 1.0.1. OMG. 2003.
13. Mizoguchi, R., M. Ikeda. Towards Ontology Engineering. Technical Report AITR-96-1, ISIR, Osaka University, 1996.
14. Chandra, C., A. Tumanyan. Supply Chain System Analysis and Modeling Using Ontology Engineering. In Proc. of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, 2004, pp. 4309-4319.
15. Staab, S., A. Maedche. Ontology Engineering beyond the Modeling of Concepts and Relations. In: Guarino, N., et al. (eds.): Proc. of the ECAI'2000 Workshop on Application of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods. IOS Press, 2000, pp. 15-21.
16. McGuinness, D., P. Patel-Schneider. Usability issues in knowledge representation systems. In: Mostow, J., Rich, C. (eds.): Proc. of AAAI-98. 1998, pp. 608-614.
17. Genesereth, M. R. Knowledge Interchange Format (KIF). (October, 2006): http://logic.stanford.edu/kif/kif.html.
18. Hou, C. S. J., N. F. Noy, M. A. Musen. A Template-Based Approach Toward Acquisition of Logical Sentences. In: Musen, M. A., et al. (eds.): Proc. of the Conference on Intelligent Information Processing (IIP-2002). Kluwer, 2002, vol. 221, pp. 77-89.
19. Protégé. Stanford Medical Informatics, Stanford University, 2006 (November, 2006): http://protege.stanford.edu.
20. Hou, J.: EZPal Tab. Stanford University, 2005 (March, 2006): http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/ezpal/.
21. Grosso, W.: The Protégé Axiom Language and Toolset ("PAL"), 2002 (September, 2005): http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/ paltabs/paldocumentation/index.html.
22. PAL Conceptual Framework, 2005 (February, 2005): http://protege.stanford. edu/plugins/paltabs/pal-documentation/lang-framework.htm.
23. Transact-SQL Reference. Create Trigger. MSDN Home, 2007 (March, 2007): http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa258254(SQL.80).aspx.
24. Package java.util.regex. Sun Microsystems. 2006 (March, 2007): http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/regex/package-summary.html.