Complications after posterior lamellar keratoplasty (DSAEK): Prevention, detection and treatment;Komplikationen nach posteriorer lamellärer Keratoplastik (DSAEK): Vermeiden, Erkennen und Behandeln

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde

Volumn 227, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 478-482

  Heindl, L M ^a   Kruse, F E ^a   Cursiefen, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

cataract; conjunctiva; cornea; DMEK; DSAEK; posterior lamellar keratoplasty

Indexed keywords

CORNEA DISEASE; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; FLAP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REVIEW; EYE DISEASES;

DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; EYE DISEASES; HUMANS;

EID: 77953837714     PISSN: 00232165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245447     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Cursiefen C, Küchle M, Naumann G OH. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty: histopathology of 1250 corneal buttons. Cornea 1998 17 468-470
2. Price F W., Price M O. Does endothelial cell survival differ between DSEK and standard PK? Ophthalmology 2009 116 367-368
3. Das S Jr, Langenbucher A, Jacobi C et al. Long-term refractive and visual outcome after penetrating keratoplasty only versus the triple procedure in Fuchs dystrophy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006 244 1089-1095
4. Bachmann B O., Pogorelov P, Kruse F E. et al. Patientenzufriedenheit nach posteriorer lamellärer Keratoplastik (DSAEK). Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2008 225 577-581
5. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Levinger E et al. Retrospective contralateral study comparing descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2009 28 485-488
6. Gorovoy M S. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006 25 886-889
7. Heindl L M., Hofmann-Rummelt C, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U et al. Histologic analysis of descemet stripping in posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2008 126 461-464
8. Melles G R., Eggink F A., Lander F et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 1998 17 618-626
9. Busin M, Arffa R C., Sebastiani A. Endokeratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty for the surgical treatment of diseased endothelium: initial results. Ophthalmology 2000 107 2077-2082
10. Cursiefen C, Kruse F E. Posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastik (DSAEK). Ophthalmologe 2009 106 939-952
11. Terry M A., Shamie N, Chen E S. et al. Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure. Ophthalmology 2009 116 631-639
12. Ousley P J., Terry M A. Stability of vision, topography, and endothelial cell density from 1 year to 2 years after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty surgery. Ophthalmology 2005 112 50-57
13. Pogorelov P, Cursiefen C, Bachmann B O. et al. Changes in donor corneal lenticule thickness after Descemets stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with organ-cultured corneas. Br J Ophthalmol 2009 93 825-829
14. Price M O., Price F W. Descemets stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology 2006 113 1936-1942
15. Price M O., Jordan C S., Moore G Jr et al. Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part two: the statistical analysis of probability and risk factors. Br J Ophthalmol 2009 93 391-395
16. Terry M A. Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2007 105 530-563
17. Terry M A., Ousley P J. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology 2005 112 1541-1548
18. Cursiefen C, Kruse F E. Posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastik (DSAEK). Ophthalmologe 2008 105 183-190
19. Anshu A, Chee S P., Mehta J S. et al. Cytomegalovirus endotheliitis in Descemets stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2009 116 624-630
20. Jordan C S., Price M O., Trespalacios R et al. Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part one: clinical signs and symptoms. Br J Ophthalmol 2009 93 387-390
21. Nguyen N X., Seitz B, Martus P et al. Long-term topical steroid treatment improves graft survival following normal-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2007 144 318-319
22. Melles G R., Ong T S., Ververs B et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 2006 25 987-990
23. Ham L, Balachandran C, Verschoor C A. et al. Visual rehabilitation rate after isolated descemet membrane transplantation: descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2009 127 252-255
24. Bachmann B, Laaser K, Cursiefen C et al. A new method for correct orientation of Descemet membrane during DMEK. Am J Ophthalmol (in press)
25. Lam V M., Nguyen N X., Martus P et al. Surgery-related factors influencing corneal neovascularization after low-risk keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2006 141 260-266
26. Ide T, Yoo S H., Kymionis G D. et al. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK): effect of nontoxic gentian violet marking pen on DSAEK donor tissue viability by using vital dye assay. Cornea 2008 27 562-564