Large-scale functional models of visual cortex for remote sensing

Proceedings - Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Brumby, Steven P ^a   Kenyon, Garrett ^a   Landecker, Will ^b   Rasmussen, Craig ^a   Swaminarayan, Sriram ^a   Bettencourt, Luís M A ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DATA SETS; FUNCTIONAL MODEL; FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION; HUMAN VISION; HUMAN VISUAL; LEARNING MODELS; LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY; PETAFLOPS; REMOTE SENSING IMAGERY; SCALING BEHAVIOR; VISUAL CORTEXES;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER VISION; REMOTE SENSING; SUPERCOMPUTERS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 77953833002     PISSN: 15505219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/AIPR.2009.5466323     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. T. Serre, A. Oliva and T. Poggio. A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104(15), pp. 6424-6429, April 2007.
2. T. Serre, L. Wolf, S. Bileschi, M. Riesenhuber and T. Poggio. Object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms. In: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29 (3), pp. 411-426, 2007.
3. K. Fukushima: Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position, Biological Cybernetics, 36(4), pp. 193-202 (April 1980).
4. Riesenhuber, M. & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical Models of Object Recognition in Cortex, Nature Neuroscience 2: 1019-1025.
5. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus and P. Perona. Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. IEEE. CVPR 2004, Workshop on Generative-Model Based Vision. 2004.
6. Brophy, A. L. (1986). Alternatives to a table of criterion values in signal detection theory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 285-286.
7. Paul Henning and Andrew White, Trailblazing with Roadrunner, Computing in Science & Engineering, July/August 2009, pp. 91-95.
8. M. Chiarella, D. Fay, R. Ivey, N. Bomberger, A. Waxman, Multisensor image fusion, mining, and reasoning: Rule sets for higher-level AFE in a COTS environment, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Fusion, Stockholm, Sweden, June 2004, pp. 983-990.
9. A. M. Waxman, J. G. Verly, D. A. Fay, F. Liu, M. I. Braun, B. Pugliese, W. Ross, and W. Streilein, A prototype system for 3D color fusion and mining of multisensor/spectral imagery, in 4th International Conference on Information Fusion, Montreal, 2001.
10. Carpenter, G. A., Gjaja, M. N., Gopal, S., & Woodcock, C. E. (1997). ART neural networks for remote sensing: Vegetation classification from Landsat TM and terrain data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35, 308-325.
11. Pinto N, Cox DD, and DiCarlo JJ. Why is Real-World Visual Object Recognition Hard? PLoS Computational Biology, 4(1): E27 (2008).
12. Hubel, D. H., Wiesel, T. N. : Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond. ) 195, 215-243 (1968).
13. Minjoon Kouh, Tomaso Poggio, A canonical neural circuit for cortical nonlinear operations. Neural computation, Vol. 20, No. 6. (6 June 2008), pp. 1427-1451, 2008.
14. Földiák, P. (1990). Forming sparse representations by local anti-hebbian learning. Biol Cybern, 64(2): 165-170.
15. Olshausen, B. A. and Field, D. J. (1996). Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381: 607-609.
16. Masquelier T and Thorpe SJ (2007). Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features through Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity. PLoS Comput Biol 3(2): E31 doi:10.1371/journal.Pcbi.0030031.
17. Masquelier T, Serre T, Thorpe SJ and Poggio T (2007). Learning complex cell invariance from natural videos: A plausibility proof. CBCL Paper #269/MIT-CSAIL-TR #2007-060, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
18. Einhäuser, W., Kayser, C., König, P., and Körding, K. P. (2002). Learning the invariance properties of complex cells from their responses to natural stimuli. Eur J Neurosci, 15(3): 475-486.
19. C. Cortes & V. Vapnik, Support-Vector Networks, Machine Leaming, 20, 273-297 (1995).
20. Chang, C.-C. and C.-J. Lin (2001). LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. Available: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.
21. R. DeValois, D. Albrecht, and L. Thorell, Spatial Frequency Selectivity of Cells in Macaque Visual Cortex, Vision Research, vol. 22, pp. 545-559, 1982.
22. R. DeValois, E. Yund, and N. Hepler, The Orientation and Direction Selectivity of Cells in Macaque Visual Cortex, Vision Research, vol. 22, pp. 531-544, 1982.
23. Hebb, D. O., The organization of behavior, New York: Wiley, 1949.
24. Oja, Erkki, Simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer, Journal of Mathematical Biology 15 (3): 267-273, Nov 1982.
25. A. Torralba and A. Oliva, Statistics of natural image categories. In Network: Computation in neural systems. Vol. 14, 391-412., 2003.
26. Griffin, G. Holub, AD. Perona, P. The Caltech-256, Caltech Technical Report, 2006. http://www.vision.caltech.edu/Image-Datasets/Caltech256.
27. L. M. A. Bettencourt, et al., Image categorization through hierarchical models of the primate visual system, Annual Meeting Society for Neuroscience, 2009.