Extent of small bowel resection does not influence the magnitude of intestinal adaptation in the mouse

Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1274-1279

  Wakeman, Derek ^a   Longshore, Shannon W ^b   McMellen, Mark E ^a   Santos, Jethrina A ^c   Guo, Jun ^a   Erwin, Christopher R ^a   Warner, Brad W ^a  

^a ST LOUIS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Apoptosis; Extent of resection; Proliferation; Small bowel resection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; C57BL 6 MOUSE; CELL EXPANSION; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRYPT CELL; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HYPOTHESIS; ILEUM; INTESTINE ADAPTATION; INTESTINE CRYPT; INTESTINE VILLUS; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OVERALL SURVIVAL; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHAM PROCEDURE; SMALL INTESTINE RESECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL TIME; TISSUE STRUCTURE; WEIGHT REDUCTION; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; DISEASE MODEL; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME; SMALL INTESTINE; SURGERY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; APOPTOSIS; CELL PROLIFERATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; INTESTINE, SMALL; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; PROGNOSIS; SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME;

EID: 77953830681     PISSN: 00223468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.101     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Longshore S.W., Wakeman D., et al. Bowel resection induced intestinal adaptation: progress from bench to bedside. Minerva Pediatr 61 3 (2009) 239-251
2. Williamson R.C. Intestinal adaptation. Structural, functional and cytokinetic changes. N Engl J Med 298 (1978) 1393-1402
3. Williamson R.C. Intestinal adaptation. Mechanisms of control. N Engl J Med 98 (1978) 1444-1450
4. Helmrath M.A., Erwin C.R., et al. Enterocyte apoptosis is increased following small bowel resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2 (1998) 44-49
5. Helmrath M.A., VanderKolk W.E., et al. Intestinal adaptation following massive small bowel resection in the mouse. J Am Coll Surg 183 5 (1996) 441-449
6. Chaet M.S., Arya G., et al. Epidermal growth factor enhances intestinal adaptation after massive small bowel resection. J Pediatr Surg 29 8 (1994) 1035-1039
7. Sigalet D.L., Lees G.M., et al. The physiology of adaptation to small bowel resection in the pig: an integrated study of morphological and functional changes. J Pediatr Surg 25 6 (1990) 650-657
8. Thompson J.S., Quigley E.M., and Adrian T.E. Effect of intestinal tapering and lengthening on intestinal structure and function. Am J Surg 169 1 (1995) 111-119
9. Secor S.M., Lane J.S., et al. Luminal nutrient signals for intestinal adaptation in pythons. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 283 (2002) G1298-G1309
10. Drozdowski L., and Thomson A.B. Intestinal mucosal adaptation. World J Gastroenterol 12 29 (2006) 4614-4627
11. Thiesen A., Drozdowski L., et al. Adaptation following intestinal resection: mechanisms and signals. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 17 6 (2003) 981-995
12. Juno R.J., Knott A.W., et al. A serum factor(s) after small bowel resection induces intestinal epithelial cell proliferation: effects of timing, site, and extent of resection. J Pediatr Surg 38 6 (2003) 868-874
13. Hanson W.R., Osborne J.W., and Sharp J.G. Compensation by the residual intestine after intestinal resection in the rat. I. Influence of amount of tissue removed. Gastroenterology 72 4 Pt 1 (1977) 692-700
14. Lanzoni N., Martins J.L., et al. Repercussions of extensive small bowel resections in growing rats. Transplant Proc 36 4 (2004) 1009-1011