Experience in the United States with public deliberation about health insurance benefits using the small group decision exercise, CHAT

Journal of Ambulatory Care Management

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 205-214

  Danis, Marion ^a   Ginsburg, Marjorie ^b   Goold, Susan ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b Center for Healthcare Decisions   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

health priorities; insurance benefits; public participation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INSURANCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; INSURANCE BENEFITS; INSURANCE, HEALTH; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953827904     PISSN: 01489917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e56340     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Amos, J. (2007, January 20). Puebloans craft health plans for working poor. The Pueblo Chieftain, 1A-3A.
2. Bornstein, D. (2007). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas (Updated ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Brownlee, S. (2007). Overtreated: Why too much medicine is making us sicker and poorer. NewYork: Bloomsbury Press.
4. Danis, M., Benavides, E., Nowak, M., & Goold, S. D. (2005). Development and evaluation of a computer decision exercise for consumer participation in insurance benefit planning. Forum for Family and Consumer Issues, 10(2), Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/ fcs/pub/ltc.html
5. Danis, M., Biddle, A., & Goold, S. D. (2002). Insurance benefit preferences of the low-income uninsured. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17, 125-133.
6. Danis, M., Biddle, A. K., & Goold, S. D. (2004). Enrollees choose priorities for Medicare. The Gerontologist, 44, 58-67.
7. Danis, M., Binnendijk, E., Vellakkal, S., Ost, A., Koren, R., & Dror, D. (2007b). Eliciting health insurance benefit choices of low income groups. Economic and Political Weekly, 62(32), 3331-3339. Retrieved from http://www.epw.org.in
8. Danis, M., Ginsburg, M., & Goold, S. D. (2006). The coverage priorities of disabled adult Medi-Cal beneficiaries. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 17, 592-609.
9. Danis, M., Goold, S. D., Parise, C., & Ginsburg, M. (2007a). Enhancing employee capacity to prioritize health insurance benefits. Health Expectations, 10, 236-247.
10. Dror, D., Koren, R., Ost, A., Binnendijk, E., Vellakkal, S., & Danis, M. (2007, February). Health insurance benefit packages that low income clients in India prioritize: Three criteria to estimate effectiveness of choice. Social Science and Medicine, 64(4), 884-896.
11. Ginsburg, M., Goold, S. D., & Danis, M. (2006). (De)constructing "Basic": Consumers define the core elements of coverage. Health Affairs, 25, 1648-1655.
12. Goold, S. D., Biddle, A. K., & Danis, M. (2004). Will insured citizens give up benefit coverage to include the uninsured? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19, 868-874.
13. Goold, S. D., Biddle, A. K., Klipp, G., Hall, C. N., & Danis, M. (2005). Choosing Healthplans All Together: A deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 30, 563-601.
14. Health Canada. (2003). Exploring the link between public involvement/citizen engagement and quality health care. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://www. hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/pubs/qual/2003-qual-simces/2003-qual- simces-7-eng.php
15. Institute of Medicine. (1998). Measuring the quality of health care. Retrieved May 16, 2010, from http:// www.iom.edu/Reports/1998/Measuring-the- Qualityof-Health-Care.aspx
16. Jacobs, L., Marmor, T., & Oberlander, J. (1999). The Oregon health plan and the political paradox of rationing: What advocates and critics have claimed and what Oregon did. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 24, 161-180.
17. Kantner, L., Goold, S. D., Nowak, M., Monroe-Gatrell, L., & Danis, M. (2006). Web tool for health insurance design by small groups: Usability study. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http:// www.acm.org/dl
18. Reeder, F. S. (2001). Access to information on the environment in the United States. In Citizens as Partners: OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making (pp. 163-176). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.