Local politics and retail cannabis markets: The case of the Dutch coffeeshops

International Journal of Drug Policy

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 315-320

  Wouters, Marije ^a   Benschop, Annemieke ^a   Korf, Dirk J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cannabis; Coffeeshop; Local politics

Indexed keywords

CANNABIS; COFFEE;

ARTICLE; DRUG MARKETING; FOOD INDUSTRY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; NETHERLANDS; POLITICS; POPULATION SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COFFEE; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; MALE; METABOLISM; POLICY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; URBAN POPULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CANNABIS; COFFEE; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; POLITICS; PUBLIC POLICY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; URBAN POPULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953812314     PISSN: 09553959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2010.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abraham M.D., Kaal H.L., Cohen P.D.A. Licit and illicit drug use in the Netherlands, 2001 2002, Cedro/Mets & Schilt, Amsterdam.
2. Achterberg P. Op weg naar een nieuwe politieke cultuur. Klasse en stemgedrag in laatmoderne samenlevingen. Sociologie 2005, 1(1):70-89.
3. Asmussen V., Moesby-Johansen C. The legal response to illegal 'hash clubs' in Denmark. European studies on drugs and drugs policy 2004, 75-97. VUB Brussels University Press, Brussels. T. Decorte, D.J. Korf (Eds.).
4. Bieleman B., Beelen A., Nijkamp R., de Bie E. Coffeeshops in Nederland. Aantallen coffeeshops en gemeentelijk beleid 1999-2007 2008, Intraval, Groningen.
5. Cohen P.D.A., Kaal H.L. The irrelevance of drug policy; the patterns and careers of experienced cannabis use in the populations of Amsterdam, San Francisco and Bremen 2001, CEDRO/UvA, Amsterdam.
6. Decorte T., Muys M., Slock S. Cannabis in Vlaanderen. Patronen van cannabisgebruik bij ervaren gebruikers 2003, ACCO, Leuven.
7. De Kort M. Tussen patiënt en delinquent: geschiedenis van het Nederlandse drugsbeleid 1995, Verloren, Hilversum.
8. Den Dulk C.J., van de Stadt H., Vliegen J.M. Een nieuwe maatstaf voor stedelijkheid: de omgevingsadressendichtheid. Maandstatistiek Bevolking (CBS) 1992, 7:14-22.
9. EMCDDA. (2008). Annual report 2008: The state of the drugs problem in Europe. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA).
10. Fahrenkrug H. Tolerated access to drug hemp: Another struggle for the normalisation of cannabis use in Switzerland. European studies on drugs and drug policy 2004, 99-112. VUB Brussels University Press, Brussels. T. Decorte, D.J. Korf (Eds.).
11. Fijnaut C., De Ruyver B. Voor een gezamenlijke beheersing van de drugsgerelateerde criminaliteit in de Euregio Maas-Rijn: een rapport voor het bestuur van de Euregio 2008, Euregio Maas-Rijn, Maastricht.
12. Garland D. The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Hibell, B., Guttormson, U., Ahlström, S., Balakivera, O., Bajrnason, T., Kokevi, A., et al. (2009). The 2007 ESPAD report. Substance use among students in 35 European countries. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information and Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN).
14. Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Economic Journal 1929, 39:41-57.
15. Jansen A.C.M. Cannabis in Amsterdam. A geography of hashish and marihuana 1991, Coutinho, Muiderberg.
16. Kiesraad Uitslag van de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van 7 maart 2006. Statistische gegevens 2006, Kiesraad, The Hague, p. 31.
17. Kilmer, B. (2002). Do cannabis possession laws influence cannabis use? In I. P. Spruit (Ed.), Cannabis 2002 report. Brussels: Ministry of Public Health of Belgium (pp. 101-124).
18. Korf D.J. Dutch coffeeshops and trends in cannabis use. Addictive Behaviors 2002, 27(6):851-866.
19. Korf D.J., Wouters M., Nabben T., Van Ginkel P. Cannabis zonder coffeeshop 2005, Rozenberg Publishers, Amsterdam.
20. Lenke L., Olsson B. Sweden: Zero tolerance wins the argument?. European drug policies and enforcement 1996, 106-119. N. Dorn, J. Jepsen, E. Savona (Eds.).
21. MacCoun R., Reuter P. Evaluating alternative cannabis regimes. British Journal of Psychiatry 2001, 178:123-128.
22. MacCoun R., Reuter P. The varieties of drug control at the dawn of the twenty-first century. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social science 2002, 582(4):7-19.
23. Monshouwer K., Verdurmen J., van Dorsselaer S., Smit E., Gorter A., Vollebergh W. Jeugd en riskant gedrag 2007 2008, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht.
24. Nabben T., Benschop A., Korf D.J. Antenne 2007. Trends in alcohol, tabak en drugs bij jonge Amsterdammers 2008, Rozenberg Publishers, Amsterdam.
25. Reinarman C., Cohen P. Lineaments of cannabis culture: Rules regulating use in Amsterdam and San Francisco. Contemporary Justice Review 2007, 10(4):407-424.
26. Reinarman C., Cohen P.D.A., Kaal H. The limited relevance of drug policy: Cannabis in Amsterdam and San Francisco. American Journal of Public Health 2004, 94:836-842.
27. Reuband K.H. Drug use and drug policy in Western-Europe. Epidemiological findings in a comparative perspective. European Addiction Research 1995, 1(1-2):32-41.
28. Richtlijnen Richtlijnen voor het opsporings- en strafvorderingsbeleid inzake strafbare feiten van de Opiumwet. Staatscourant 1996, 187.
29. Rodenburg G., Spijkerman R., van den Eijnden R., Van de Mheen D. Nationaal prevalentieonderzoek middelengebruik, 2005 2007, IVO, Rotterdam.
30. Storgaard L.L. Trends in cannabis use and changes in cannabis policy in Denmark. Research on drugs and drug policy from a European perspective 2005, 35-47. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich. L. Kraus, D.J. Korf (Eds.).
31. Vuillaume D. Changing scientific perspectives on cannabis use. Cannabis in Europe: Dynamics in perception, policy and markets 2008, 15-29. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich. D.J. Korf (Ed.).
32. Wacquant L. Punir les pauvres, le nouveau gouvernement de l'insécurité sociale 2004, Agone, Marseille.
33. Wouters M., Korf D.J. Access to licensed cannabis supply and the separation of markets policy in the Netherlands. Journal of Drug Issues 2009, 39(3):627-652.