Effect of subcutaneous fat on quantitative bone ultrasound in chicken and neonates

Pediatric Research

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 81-83

  Bajaj, Monika ^a   Koo, Winston ^a   Hammami, Mouhanad ^a   Hockman, Elaine M ^b  

^a HUTZEL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE; BONE STRENGTH; CHICKEN; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPEED OF SOUND MEASUREMENT; SUBCUTANEOUS FAT; ULTRASOUND; ANIMAL; BONE DENSITY; DEVICES; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; NEWBORN; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; REFERENCE VALUE; STANDARDS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; BONE DENSITY; CHICKENS; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; REFERENCE VALUES; SUBCUTANEOUS FAT; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 77953808296     PISSN: 00313998     EISSN: 15300447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181df9c8c     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. National osteoporosis foundation. Osteoporosis. Available at: http://www.nof.org/osteoporosis/index.htm. Accessed June 1, 2009.
2. Njeh CF, Hans D, Wu C, Kantorovich E, Sister M, Fuerst T, Genant HK 1999 An in vitro investigation of the dependence on sample thickness of the speed of sound along the specimen. Med Eng Phys 21:651-659
3. Nicholson PH, Moilanen P, Karkkainen T, Timonen J, Cheng S 2002 Guided ultrasonic waves in long bones: modeling, experiment and in vivo application. Physiol Meas 23:755-768
4. Bossy E, Talmant M, Peyrin F, Akrout L, Cloetens P, Laugier P 2004 An in vitro study of the ultrasonic axial transmission technique at the radius: 1-MHz velocity measurements are sensitive to both mineralization and intracortical porosity. J Bone Miner Res 19:1548-1556
5. Koo MW, Yang KH, Begeman P, Hammami M, Koo WW 2001 Prediction of bone strength in growing animals using noninvasive bone mass measurements. Calcif Tissue Int 68:230-234
6. Hammami M, Walters JC, Hockman EM, Koo WW 2001 Disproportionate alterations in body composition of large for gestational age neonates. J Pediatr 138:817-821
7. Littner Y, Mandel D, Mimouni FB, Dollberg S 2004 Decreased bone ultrasound velocity in large-for-gestational-age infants. J Perinatol 24:21-23 (Pubitemid 38159798)
8. Koo WW, Bajaj M, Mosely M, Hammami M 2008 Quantitative bone US measurements in neonates and their mothers. Pediatr Radiol 38:1323-1329
9. Liao XP, Zhang WL, He J, Sun JH, Huang P 2005 Bone measurements of infants in the first 3 months of life by quantitative ultrasound: the influence of gestational age, season, and postnatal age. Pediatr Radiol 35:847-853
10. Chen M, Ashmeade T, Carver JD 2007 Bone ultrasound velocity in small-versus appropriate-for-gestational age preterm infants. J Perinatol 27:485-489
11. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, Mei Z, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL 2000 CDC Growth Charts: United States. Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics; No.314. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD
12. Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK 1995 Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproductibility of bone densi-tometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 5:262-270
13. Baroncelli GI 2008 Quantitative ultrasound methods to assess bone mineral status in children: technical characteristics, performance, and clinical application. Pediatr Res 63:220-228
14. Wright LL, Glade MJ, Gopal J 1987 The use of transmission ultrasonics to assess bone status in the human newborn. Pediatr Res 22:541-544
15. Koo WW, Walters JC, Hockman EM 2004 Body composition in neonates: relationship between measured and derived anthropometry with dual energy X ray absorp-tiometry measurements. Pediatr Res 56:694-700
16. Gluer CC 2007 Quantitative ultrasound\it is time to focus research efforts. Bone 40:9-13