Rotational response of two-component Bose-Einstein condensates in ring traps

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Halkyard, P L ^a   Jones, M P A ^a   Gardiner, S A ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATES; DENSITY FRINGES; MEAN-FIELD DESCRIPTION; POPULATION OSCILLATION; ROTATING FRAME; ROTATIONAL RESPONSE; SAGNAC PHASE; TWO-COMPONENT;

STATISTICAL MECHANICS; STEAM CONDENSERS;

ROTATION;

EID: 77953782521     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.061602     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. E. J. Post, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.39.475 39, 475 (1967).
2. E. Varoquaux and G. Varoquaux, Phys. Usp. PHUSEY 1063-7869 10.1070/PU2008v051n02ABEH006425 51, 205 (2008);
3. J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 1550-7998 10.1103/PhysRevD.24.338 24, 338 (1981);
4. G. Rizzi and M. L. Ruggiero, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. GRGVA8 0001-7701 10.1023/A:1027345505786 35, 2129 (2003).
5. P. Wang, Chin. Phys. Lett. CPLEEU 0256-307X 10.1088/0256-307X/24/1/008 24, 27 (2007);
6. S. Wu, E. Su, and M. Prentiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.173201 99, 173201 (2007);
7. F. Riehle, T. Kisters, A. Witte, J. Helmcke, and C. J. Borde, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.177 67, 177 (1991);
8. T. L. Gustavson, P. Bouyer, and M. A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2046 78, 2046 (1997).
9. S. Dimopoulos, P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, and M. A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 1550-7998 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.042003 78, 042003 (2008);
10. T. L. Gustavson, A. Landragin, and M. A. Kasevich, Classical Quantum Gravity CQGRDG 0264-9381 10.1088/0264-9381/17/12/311 17, 2385 (2000).
11. C. Ryu, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.260401 99, 260401 (2007).
12. K. Henderson, New J. Phys. NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/043030 11, 043030 (2009).
13. A. S. Arnold, C. S. Garvie, and E. Riis, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.041606 73, 041606 (R) (2006).
14. J. A. Sauer, M. D. Barrett, and M. S. Chapman, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.270401 87, 270401 (2001);
15. S. Gupta, K. W. Murch, K. L. Moore, T. P. Purdy, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.143201 95, 143201 (2005).
16. M. F. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97. 170406 97, 170406 (2006).
17. L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185 45, 8185 (1992);
18. K. C. Wright, L. S. Leslie, and N. P. Bigelow, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.041601 77, 041601 (2008).
19. H. Pu and N. P. Bigelow, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1130 80, 1130 (1998);
20. B. J. Dalton, J. Mod. Opt. JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/09500340600677682 54, 615 (2006);
21. M. Trippenbach, J. Phys. B JPAPEH 0953-4075 10.1088/0953-4075/33/19/314 33, 4017 (2000).
22. S. Thanvanthri, K. T. Kapale, and J. P. Dowling, e-print arXiv: 0907.1138v1;
23. S. Thanvanthri, K. T. Kapale, and J. P. Dowling Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.053825 77, 053825 (2008).
24. S. Boixo, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101. 040403 101, 040403 (2008);
25. H. J. Lewandowski, Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado, 2002.
26. / 4 exp (- m ω r [r - ρ] 2 / 2 □). This assumes √ □ / M ω r □ ρ and ℓ □ ρ / √ □ / M ω r, where □ ℓ quantifies the maximum angular momentum (the latter optional simplification ensures the effective radial trapping potential, including a centrifugal term, can be considered identical for angular momenta up to ± □ ℓ).
27. D. S. Petrov, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and J. T. M. Walraven, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3745 85, 3745 (2000);
28. L. D. Carr, M. A. Leung, and W. P. Reinhardt, J. Phys. B JPAPEH 0953-4075 10.1088/0953-4075/33/19/312 33, 3983 (2000);
29. V. Bagnato and D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.7439 44, 7439 (1991);
30. O. Morizot, Y. Colombe, V. Lorent, H. Perrin, and B. M. Garraway, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.023617 74, 023617 (2006).
31. Where m is otherwise a known integer or half-integer value.
32. This exact configuration is not strongly quasi-1D; it provides a useful basis for comparison, however, and we do not expect a quasi-1D mean field to be critical to the proposal's success.
33. C. Chin, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1225 82, 1225 (2010).
34. The vector notation is misleading, however, as the relative phase information between components is lost.
35. K. Eckert, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.013814 73, 013814 (2006);
36. B. Dubetsky and M. A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.023615 74, 023615 (2006);
37. D. S. Durfee, Y. K. Shaham, and M. A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.240801 97, 240801 (2006);
38. T. Lévèque, A. Gauguet, F. Michaud, F. Pereira Dos Santos, and A. Landragin, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103. 080405 103, 080405 (2009).
39. Also ℓ = ρ p / □ need not be integer valued.