The effects of layout on detecting the role of design patterns

Software Engineering Education Conference, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 41-48

  Sharif, Bonita ^a   Maletic, Jonathan I ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; DESIGN PATTERNS; DETECTION ACCURACY; DETECTION TIME; LAYOUT SCHEMES; OPEN SOURCE SYSTEM; UML CLASS DIAGRAMS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DESIGN; OPEN SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 77953753721     PISSN: 10930175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2010.23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Alphonce, C., Caspersen, M., and Decker, A., "Killer "killer examples" for Design Patterns", in Proc. of 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Kentucky, Mar. 7-10 2007, pp. 228 - 232.
2. Andriyevska, O., Dragan, N., Simoes, B., and Maletic, J. I., "Evaluating UML Class Diagram Layout based on Architectural Importance", in Proc. of 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis, Budapest, Hungary, Sept 25th 2005, pp. 14-19.
3. Christensen, H. B., "Frameworks: putting design patterns into perspective", 9th SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education 2004, pp. 142 - 145.
4. Della, L. and Clark, D., "Teaching Object-Oriented Development with Emphasis on Pattern Application", in Proceedings of Australasian conference on Computing education, 2000, pp. 56-63.
5. Dukovich, A. and Janzen, D. S., "Design Patterns Go to Hollywood: Teaching Patterns with Multimedia", in Proc. of 6th Intl. Conf. on Information Technology: New Generations, Nevada, Apr 27-29 2009, pp. 684-689.
6. Eichelberger, H., "Nice Class Diagrams Admit Good Design?" in Proc. of ACM Symposium on Software Visualization (SoftVis), San Diego, 2003, pp. 159-167.
7. Eichelberger, H. and Schmid, K., "Guidelines on the aesthetic quality of UML class diagrams", Information and Software Technology, vol. 51, no. 12, 2009, pp. 1686-1698.
8. Eiglsperger, M., Kaufmann, M., and Siebenhaller, M., "A Topology-Shape-Metrics Approach for the Automatic Layout of UML Class Diagram", in Proceedings of SoftVis, San Diego, CA, USA, 2003, pp. 189-198.
9. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., and Vlissides, J., Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley, 1995.
10. Gómez-Martin, M., Jiménez-Diaz, G., and Arroyo, J., "Teaching Design Patterns Using a Family of Games", in Proc. of 14th SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Tech. in Computer Science Education, 2009, pp. 268-272.
11. Guéhéneuc, Y.-G., "TAUPE: towards understanding program comprehension", in Proceedings of 16th IBM Centers for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research (CASCON), Canada, Oct 2006, pp. 1-13.
12. Gutwenger, C., Jünger, M., Klein, K., Kupke, J., Leipert, S., and Mutzel, P., "A New Approach for Visualizing UML Class Diagrams", in Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Software Visualization (SoftVis), 2003, pp. 179-188.
13. Hamer, J., "An Approach to Teaching Design Patterns using Musical Composition", in Proceedings of 9th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and tech. in computer science education, Leeds, UK, 2004, pp. 156 - 160.
14. Jeanmart, S., Guéhéneuc, Y.-G., Sahraoui, H., and Habra, N., "Impact of the Visitor Pattern on Program Comprehension and Maintenance", in Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, Oct 15-16 2009, pp. 10 pages to appear.
15. Purchase, C. H., Allder, J.-A., and Carrington, D., "Graph Layout Aesthetics in UML Diagrams: User Preferences", Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, vol. 6, no. 3, 2002, pp. 255-279.
16. Purchase, C. H., McGill, M., Colpoys, L., and Carrington, D., "Graph Drawing Aesthetics and the Comprehension of UML Class Diagrams: An Empirical Study", in Proceedings of Australian Symposium on Information Visualisation, Sydney, Australia, December 2001, pp. 129-137.
17. Sharif, B. and Maletic, J. I., "The Effect of Layout on the Comprehension of UML Class Diagrams: A Controlled Experiment", in Proceedings of 5th IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis (VISSOFT), Edmonton, Canada, Sept 25 2009, pp. 11-18.
18. Sharif, B. and Maletic, J. I., "An Empirical Study on the Comprehension of Stereotyped UML Class Diagram Layouts", in Proceedings of 17th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC), Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 17-19 2009, pp. 268-272.
19. Sun, D. and Wong, K., "On Evaluating the Layout of UML Class Diagrams for Program Comprehension", in Proc. of 13th IEEE Intl Workshop on Program Comprehension, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 2005, pp. 317-328.
20. Warren, I., "Teaching Patterns and Software Design", in Proceedings of Australasian conference on Computing Education, Newcastle, Australia, 2005, pp. 39 - 49.
21. Weiss, S., "Teaching Design Patterns By Stealth", in Proceedings of 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, Missouri, 2005, pp. 492-494.
22. Yusuf, S., Kagdi, H., and Maletic, J. I., "Assessing the Comprehension of UML Class Diagrams via Eye Tracking", in Proc. of 15th IEEE Intl. Conf. on Program Comprehension, Canada, Jun 26-29 2007, pp. 113-122.