Teaching an end-user testing methodology

Software Engineering Education Conference, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 81-88

  Liu, Huai ^a   Kuo, Fei Ching ^a   Chen, Tsong Yueh ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EFFECTIVE TESTING; END USER PROGRAMMERS; END USER TESTING; END-USERS; FORMAL TRAINING; MELBOURNE , AUSTRALIA; METAMORPHIC TESTING; QUALITY SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE; SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE TESTING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION;

EID: 77953750688     PISSN: 10930175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2010.28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. M. Burnett, C. Cook, and G. Rothermal. End-user software engineering. Communications of the ACM, 47(9):53-58, 2004.
2. T. Y. Chen, S. C. Cheung, and S. M. Yiu. Metamorphic testing: a new approach for generating next test cases. Technical Report HKUST-CS98-01, Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, 1998.
3. T. Y. Chen, J. W. K. Ho, H. Liu, and X. Xie. An innovative approach for testing bioinformatics programs using metamorphic testing. BMC Bioinformatics, 10:24, 2009.
4. T. Y. Chen, F.-C. Kuo, and Z. Q. Zhou. An effective testing method for end-user programmers. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on End-User Software Engineering (WEUSE), pages 1-5, 2005.
5. T. Y. Chen and P.-L. Poon. Experience with teaching black-box testing in a computer science/software engineering curriculum. IEEE Transactions on Education, 47(1):42-50, 2004.
6. T. Y. Chen, T. H. Tse, and Z. Q. Zhou. Fault-based testing without the need of oracles. Information and Software Technology, 45(1):1-9, 2003.
7. E. W. Dijkstra. The end of computing science? Communications of the ACM, 44(3):92, 2001.
8. A. Gotlieb and B. Botella. Automated metamorphic testing. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC 2003), pages 34-40, 2003.
9. E. L. Jones and C. L. Chatmon. A perspective on teaching software testing. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 16(3):92-100, 2001.
10. C. Murphy, K. Shen, and G. E. Kaiser. Automatic system testing of programs without test oracles. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA 2009), pages 189-199, 2009.
11. G. J. Myers. The Art of Software Testing. John Wiley and Sons, second edition, 2004. revised and updated by T. Badgett and T. M. Thomas with C. Sandler.
12. National Institute of Standards and Technology. The economic impacts of inadequate infrastructure for software testing. http://www.nist.gov/director/ prog-ofc/report02-3.pdf, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, 2002.
13. T. J. Ostrand and M. J. Balcer. The category-partition method for specifying and generating functional tests. Communications of the ACM, 31(6):676-686, 1988.
14. J. Sanders and E. Curran. Software Quality: A Framework for Success in Software Development and Support. Workingham: Addison-Wesley, 1994.
15. L. J. White and E. I. Cohen. A domain strategy for computer program testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 6(3):247-257, 1980.
16. H. Zhu, P. A. V. Hall, and J. H. R. May. Software unit test coverage and adequacy. ACM computing surveys, 29(4):366-427, 1997.