Un analisis de las fases del conflicto en el entorno de auditoria en españa

Revista Espanola de Financiacion y Contabilidad

Volumn 26, Issue 89, 1996, Pages 785-820

  Barbadillo, Emiliano Ruiz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CÁDIZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953745495     PISSN: 02102412     EISSN: 02102412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (1978): The Commissions on Auditor's Responsabilities, Report, Conclusions and Recommendations. The Cohen Commission, New York, AICPA.
2. AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (1986): Restructuring Professional Standards to Achieve Professional Excellence in a Changing Environment. The Anderson Commission, New York, AICPA.
3. AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (1987): Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Treadway Commission, New York, AICPA.
4. ANDERSON, G., y ELLYSON, R. (1986): «Reestructuring Professional Standards: The Anderson Report», Journal of Accountancy, vol. 16, pp. 92-104.
5. BOLAND, R. (1982): «Myth and Technology in the American Accounting Professions», Journal of Management Studies, vol. 16, pp. 109-127.
6. BURNS, T., y LAUGHLIN, C. (1979): «Ritual and Social Power», En D'Aquilli, E. y Laughling, C. (Ed.): The Spectrum of Ritual, New York, Columbia University Press.
7. BYINGTON, J., y SUTTON, S. (1991): «The Self-regulation Profession: an Analysis of the Political Monopoly of the Audit Profession», Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 2, pp. 315-330.
8. CEA GARCÍA, J. L. (1992): El Registro Oficial de Auditores de Cuentas y las Corporaciones de Auditores. Recogido en
9. GONZALO ANGULO, J. A. (1992): La Contabilidad en España 1992, Madrid, Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas.
10. DEANGELO, L. (1981): «Auditor Independence, Low Balling and Disclosure Regulation», Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 3, pp. 113-127.
11. DONABEDIAN, B. (1991): «The Economic Rationales of CPA Licencing», Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 10, pp. 85-103.
12. DONABEDIAN, B. (1993): «Accountin Self-Regulation and the Enforcement of Professional Codes», Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 12, pp. 87-112.
13. FOGARTY, T.; HEIAU, J., y KNUTSON, D. (1991): «The Rationality of Doing Nothing: Auditor Responses to Legal Liability in a Institutionalized Environment», Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 2, pp. 201-226.
14. GARCÍA BENAU, M. A. (1994): «La Pregunta ¿dónde estabán los auditores? ha llegado a España», Boletín AECA, 36, pp. 4-7.
15. GARCÍA BENAU, M. A., y HUMPHREY, C. (1992): «Beyond the Audit Expectations Gap: Learning the experiences of Britain and Spain», The European Accounting Review, vol. 1, pp. 303-331.
16. GARCÍA BENAU, M. A.; HUMPHREY, C.; MOIZER, P., y TURLEY, S. (1993): La Auditoría y sus Expectativas: Los casos de España y el Reino Unido, Madrid, Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas.
17. HINES, R. (1989): «Financial Accounting Knowledge, Conceptual Framework and the Social Construction of the Accounting Profession», Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, vol. 2, pp. 272-292
18. HOPWOOD, A. (1990): «Ambiguity, Knowledge and Territorial Claims. Some observations on the Doctrine of Substance over Form: A review Essay», British Accounting Review, vol. 22, pp. 79-87.
19. HUMPHREY, C. (1991): «Audit Expectatives», en Current Issues in Auditing, editado por Sherer, M. y Turley, W. Paul Chapman Publishing, pp. 3-21.
20. HUMPHREY, C., y MOIZER, P. (1990): «From Techniques to Ideologies: An Alternative Perspective on the Audit Function», Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 1, pp. 217-238.
21. HUMPHREY, C.; MOIZER, P., y TURLEY, W. (1992 a): «The Audit Expectations: Gap-Plus Ca Change, Plus C'est la Même Chose», Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 3, pp. 137-161.
22. HUMPHREY, C.; MOIZER, P., y TURLEY, W. (1992 b): The Audit Expectations in the United Kindom, London, the Intitute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
23. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS IN ENGLAND AND WALES (1985 a): Report of the Working Party on Fraud. The Davidson Report, London, ICAEW.
24. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS IN ENGLAND AND WALES (1985 b): The Auditor and Fraud. Report of Lord Benson, London, ICAEW.
25. JOHNSON, T. (1972): Professions and Power, MacMillan.
26. KAPLAN, R. (1987): «Accountants' Liability and Audit Failures: When The Umpire Strikes Out», Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 6, pp. 1-8.
27. KLEGON, D. (1978): «The Sociology of Professions: An Emerging Perspective», Sociology of Work and Occupation, vol. 5, pp. 259-283.
28. KULLBERG, D. (1985): Reporting to the Public: Who's Responsible, Arthur Andersen & Co.
29. LARSON, M. (1977): The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis, Berkely, University of California Press.
30. MARTENS, S., y MCENROE, J. (1991): «Interprofessional Strugles over Definition: Lawyers, Accountans and Illegal Acts», Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 2, pp. 375-384.
31. MILLER, T. (1992): «Do we Need to Consider the Individual Auditor when Discussing Auditor Independence», Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, vol. 5, pp. 74-84.
32. MILLS, S., y BETTNER, M. (1992): «Ritual and Conflict in the Audit Profession», Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 3, pp. 185-200.
33. MITCHELL, A.; PUXTY, A; SIKKA, P., y WILLMOTT, H. (1991): Accounting for Change-A Proposal for Reform of Audit and Accountancy, Fabian Society, London.
34. MITCHELL, A., y SIKKA, P. (1993): «Accounting for Change: The Institutions of Accountancy», Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 4, pp. 29-52.
35. MONROE, G., y WOODLIFF, D. (1993): «An Empirical Investigation of the Audit Expectations Gap: An Australian Evidence», Paper Presented 16 th European Accounting Association, Turku.
36. MONTERREY MAYORAL, J. (1989): El informe de la Comisión Treadway sobre la información fraudelenta en Estados Unidos, Técnica Contable, pp. 505-514.
37. PARKER, L. (1994): «Professional Accounting Body Ethics: In Search of the Private Interest», Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 19, pp. 507-525.
38. PICAZO GONZÁLEZ, P. (1994): «Balance de la Reforma Contable Mercantil: La opinión de los expertos», Partida Doble, núm. 50, pp. 15-16.
39. PICAZO GONZÁLEZ, P. (1995): «La responsabilidad del auditor en la detección de fraudes y los problemas de gestión continuada de la empresa», Partida Doble, pp. 59-65.
40. POWER, M. (1991): «Educating Accountants: Towards a Critical Ethnography», Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 16, pp. 333-353.
41. RADCLIFFE, V.; COOPER, D., y ROBSON, K. (1994): «The Mangement of Professional Enterprises and Regulatory Change: British Accountancy and the Financial Services Act, 1986», Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 19, pp. 601-628.
42. RICHARDSON, A. (1987): «Accounting as a Legitimating Institution», Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 12, pp. 341-356.
43. RICHARDSON, A. (1988): «Accounting Knowledge and Professional Privilege», Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 13, pp. 381-396.
44. RICHARDSON, A. (1989): «Corporatism and Intraprofessional Hegemony: A Study of Regulation and Internal Social Order», Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 14, pp. 415-432.
45. ROBSON, K., y COOPER, D. (1990): «Understanding the Development of the Accounting Profession in the United Kingdom», En Cooper, D. y Hopper, T. (Ed): Critical Accounting. Londres, MacMillan.
46. ROBSON, K.; WILLMOTT, H.; COOPER, D., y PUXTY, T. (1994): «The Ideology of Professional Regulation and the Markets for Accounting Labour. Three Episodes in the Recent History of the U.K. Accountancy Profession», Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 19, pp. 527-533.
47. RULAND, R., y LINDBLOM, C. (1992): «Ethics and Disclosure: an Analysis on Conflicting Duties», Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 3, pp. 259-272.
48. SIKKA, P.; WILLMOTT, H., y LOWE, E. (1989): «Guardians of Knowledge and Public Interest: Evidence and Issues of Accountability in the U.K. Accountancy Professions», Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, vol. 2, pp. 47-71.
49. SIMUNIC, D., y STEIN, M. (1987): Product Differentiation in Auditing: Auditor Choice in the Market for Unreasoned New Issues, Toronto, Canadian Certified General Accountants' Research Foundation.
50. STEVENS, M. (1988): «No More White Shoes», Business Month. pp. 39-42.
51. TUA PEREDA, J., y GONZALO ANGULO, J. A. (1987): «La responsabilidad social del auditor», Técnica Contable, núm. 466, pp. 435-452.
52. TURNER, L., y DEPREE, CH. (1991): «The Relative Efficiency of Boards of Accountancy: A Measure of the Profession's Enforcement and Disciplinary Processes», Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 10, pp. 1-13.
53. WALKER, S. (1991): «The Defense of Professional Monopoly: Scottish Chartered Accountants and Satellites in the Accountancy Firmament 1854-1914», Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 16, pp. 257-283.
54. WILLMOT, H. (1986): «Organising the Accounting: A Theoretical and Historical Examination of the Development of the Major Accounting Bodies in the U.K.», Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 11, pp. 553-582.
55. YEBRA CEMBORAIN, O. (1994): «Balance de la Reforma Contable Mercantil: La opinión de los expertos», Partida Doble, núm. 50, pp. 11-14.
56. YOUNG, S. (1986): «Accounting Licensure, Quality and the Cadillac Effect», Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 5, pp. 5-19.
57. YOUNG, S. (1988): «The Economic Theory of Regulation: Evidence from the Uniform CPA Examination», The Accounting Review, vol. 63, pp. 283-291.
58. ZEFF, S. (1987): «Does the CPA Belong to a Profession?», Accounting Horizons, vol. 1, pp. 65-68.