A note on the invariance of the dina model parameters

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 115-127

  de la Torre, Jimmy ^a   Lee, Young Sun ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Teachers College Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953743410     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: 17453984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2009.00102.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Custer M, Sharairi S, Yamazaki K, Signatur D, Swift D, Frey S. A paradox between IRT invariance and model-data fit when utilizing the one-parameter and three-parameter models. 2008, March, New York, NY
2. de la Torre J. Model fit and parameter invariance: The case of the higher-order DINA model. 2005, April, Montreal, Canada
3. de la Torre J. Attribute vector profile comparisons at the state level: An application and extension of cognitive diagnosis modeling in NAEP. 2006, June, Montreal, Canada
4. de la Torre J. An empirically-based method of Q-matrix validation for the DINA model: Development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement 2008a, 45:343-362.
5. de la Torre J. The generalized DINA model. 2008b, July, Durham, NH
6. de la Torre J. A cognitive diagnosis model for cognitively-based multiple-choice options. Applied Psychological Measurement 2009a, 33:163-183.
7. de la Torre J. DINA model and parameter estimation: A didactic. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 2009b, 34:115-130.
8. de la Torre J, Douglas J. Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika 2004, 69:333-353.
9. de la Torre J, Douglas J. Model evaluation and multiple strategies in cognitive diagnosis: An analysis of fraction subtraction data. Psychometrika 2008, 74:595-624.
10. de la Torre J, Lee Y -S. Cognitive diagnosticity of IRT-constructed assessment: An empirical investigation. 2008, March, New York, NY
11. de la Torre J, Liu Y. A cognitive diagnosis model for continuous response. 2008, March, New York, NY
12. Doignon J P, Falmagne J C. Knowledge spaces 1999, New York, NY, Springer-Verlag
13. Doornik J A. Object-oriented matrix programming using Ox 2002, Version 3.1, Computer software, London, England, Timberlake Consultants Press
14. Fan X, Ping Y. Assessing the effect of model-data misfit on the invariance property of IRT parameter estimates. 1999, April, Montreal, Canada
15. Forsyth R, Saisangian U, Gilmer J. Some empirical results related to the robustness of the Rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement 1981, 5:175-186.
16. Gorin J S, Embretson S E. Item difficulty modeling of paragraph comprehension items. Applied Psychological Measurement 2006, 30:394-411.
17. Haertel E H. Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items. Journal of Educational Measurement 1989, 26:333-352.
18. Hartz S M. A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality 2002, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
19. Jang E. Cognitive diagnostic assessment of L2 reading comprehension ability: Validity arguments for fusion model application to language assessment. Language Testing 2009, 26:31-73.
20. Junker B W, Sijtsma K. Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement 2001, 25:258-272.
21. Leighton J P, Gierl M J, Hunka S. The attribute hierarchy model: An approach for integrating cognitive theory with assessment practice. Journal of Educational Measurement 2004, 41:205-236.
22. Macready G B, Dayton C M. The use of probabilistic models in the assessment of mastery. Journal of Educational Statistics 1977, 33:379-416.
23. Roussos L, Templin J, Henson R. Skills diagnosis using IRT-based latent class models. Journal of Educational Measurement 2007, 44:293-311.
24. Tatsuoka C. Data-analytic methods for latent partially ordered classification models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 2002, 51:337-350.
25. Tatsuoka C. Data-analytic methods for latent partially ordered classification models: Corrigendum. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 2005, 54:465-467.
26. Tatsuoka K K. Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 1983, 20:345-354.
27. Tatsuoka K K. Toward an integration of item-response theory and cognitive error diagnosis. Monitoring attribute vector and knowledge acquisition 1990, 453-488. Frederiksen NGlaser RLesgold ASafto M. In, Eds., pp, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
28. Templin J, Henson R, Rupp A, Jang E. Cognitive diagnosis models for nominal response data. 2008, April, New York, NY
29. Wright B D. IRT in the 1990s: Which models work best. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1992, 6:196-200.
30. Xu X, von Davier M. Linking for the general diagnostic model 2008, ETS Research Report No. RR-08-08, Princeton, NJ, Educational Testing Service