A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 648-652

  Dere, Kamer ^a   Sucullu, Ilker ^b   Budak, Ersel Tan ^c   Yeyen, Suleyman ^c   Filiz, Ali Ilker ^b   Ozkan, Sezai ^c   Dagli, Guner ^c  

^a Department of Anesthesiology   (Turkey)

^b Department of General Surgery ^*  (Turkey)

^c GATA HAYDARPASA TRAINING HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; Dexmedetomidine; Hemodynamics; Midazolam; Sedation

Indexed keywords

DEXMEDETOMIDINE; FENTANYL; FENTANYL CITRATE; MIDAZOLAM; MIDAZOLAM MALEATE;

ADULT; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; APNEA; ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LOADING DRUG DOSE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NUMERIC RATING SCALE; OXYGEN SATURATION; PAIN; RAMSAY SEDATION SCALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SATISFACTION; SIDE EFFECT;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESICS; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; COLONOSCOPY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; CONSCIOUSNESS; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FENTANYL; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; MIDAZOLAM; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77953743326     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283347bfe     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Wong RCK. The menu of endoscopic sedation: all-you-can eat, combination set, a la carte, alternative cuisine, org o hungry. Endoscopy 2001; 54:122-126.
2. Ozel AM,ÖncüK, Yazgan Y, et al. Comparison of the effects of intravenous midazolam alone and in combination with meperidine on hemodynamic and respiratory responses and on patient compliance during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized, double-blind trial. Turk J Gastroenterol 2008; 19:8-13.
3. Gan TJ. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of medications used for moderate sedation. Clin Pharmacokinet 2006; 45:855-869.
4. Robin C, Trieger N. Paradoxical reactions to benzodiazepines in intravenous sedation: a report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Anesth Prog 2002; 49:128-132.
5. Aantaa R, Scheinin M. Alpha -2- adrenergic agent in anaesthesia. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1993; 37:1-16.
6. Venn M. Preliminary UK experience of dexmedetomidine, a novel agent for postoperative sedation in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 1999; 54:1136-1142.
7. Kamibayashi T, Maze M. Clinical uses of alfa2-adrenergic agonists. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:1345-1349.
8. Taittonen MT, KirveläOA, Aantaa R, Kanto JH. Effect of clonidine and dexmedetomidine premedication on perioperative oxygen consumption and haemodynamic state. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78:400-406.
9. Wijeysundera DN, Naik JS, Beattie WS. Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists to prevent perioperative cardiovascular complications: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 2003; 114:742-752.
10. Hsu YW, Cortinez LI, Robertson KM, et al. Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: Part I, Crossover comparison of the respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:1066-1076.
11. Bloor BC, Ward DS, Belleville JP, Maze M. Effects of IV dexmedetomidine in humans: II. Hemodynamic changes. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:1134-1142.
12. Aldrete JA. The postanesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7:89-91.
13. Ramsay MAE, Savage TM, Simpson BRJ, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alfaxolone-alphadolone. BMJ 1974; 2:656-659.
14. Gould D. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. J Clin Nurs 2001; 10:697-706.
15. Demiraran Y, Korkut E, Tamer A, et al. The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized study. Can J Gastroenterol 2007; 21:25-29.
16. Jalowiecki P, Rudner R, Gonciarz M, et al. Sole use of dexmedetomidine has limited utility for conscious sedation during outpatient colonoscopy. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:269-273.
17. Seybold JL, Ramamurthi RJ, Hammer GB. The use of dexmedetomidine during laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy, and tracheal extubation following tracheal reconstruction. Paediatr Anaesth 2007; 17:1212-1214.
18. Uzümcügil F, Canbay O, Celebi N, et al. Comparison of dexmedetomidinepropofol vs. fentanyl-propofol for laryngeal mask insertion. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25:675-680.
19. Zeyneloǧlu P, Pirat A, Candan S, et al. Dexmedetomidine causes prolonged recovery when compared with midazolam/fentanyl combination in outpatient shock wave lithotripsy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25:961-967.