Contradictions and justifications: Extensions to the textual entailment task

ACL-08: HLT - 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 63-71

  Voorhees, Ellen M ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION TASK; END USERS; RECOGNIZING TEXTUAL ENTAILMENTS; SYSTEM COMPARISONS; TEST SETS; TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT; UNDERSTANDABILITY;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 77953729686     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. 2006. The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 3944, pages 177-190. Springer-Verlag.
2. Christiane Fellbaum, editor. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press.
3. Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini, Ido Dagan, and Bill Dolan. 2007. The third PASCAL recognizing textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the ACLPASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 1-9. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Dekang Lin and Patrick Pantel. 2001. DIRT - Discovery of inference rules from text. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-01), pages 323-328.
5. Ellen M. Voorhees and Dawn M. Tice. 2000. Building a question answering test collection. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 200-207, July.
6. Ellen M. Voorhees. 2000. Variations in relevance judgments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness. Information Processing and Management, 36:697- 716.