Effects of the application of the new CAP and the Water Framework Directive in irrigated agriculture;Efectos de la aplicación de la nueva PAC y la Directiva Marco de Aguas en el regadío. El caso de la comarca de Arévalo-Madrigal (Ávila)

ITEA Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 335-359

  Gallego, J ^a   Gomez Limon J A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Agricultural policy; Irrigated agriculture; Positive Mathematical Programming; Water policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953725379     PISSN: 16996887     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alarcón S, Sebastián RA, Serrano A, 1997. Modelización de explotaciones agrarias mediante programación matemática. Una aplicación en la comarca de Arévalo- Madrigal (Ávila). Investigación Agraria Serie Economía 12: 299-320.
2. Alonso R, Serrano A, 1998. Evaluación de los efectos de la reforma de la PAC de 1992 y de la Agenda 2000 sobre las explotaciones agrícolas en la comarca de Arévalo-Madrigal. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros 184: 9-36.
3. Arriaza M, Gómez-Limón JA, 2003. Comparative performance of selected mathematical programming models. Agricultural Systems 77: 155-171.
4. Berbel J, Rodríguez A, 1998. An MCDM approach to production analysis. An application to irrigated farms in Southern Spain. European Journal of Operational Research 107: 108-118.
5. Blanco M, Iglesias E, Sumpsi JM, 2004. Environmental and socioeconomics effects of water pricing polices: Key issues in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. 13th Annual Conference European Association of Environmental Resource Economics, 25-28 de junio, Budapest.
6. Britz W, Heckelei T, Wolff H, 2003. Symmetric Positive Equilibrium Problem: A Framework for rationalizing Economic Behavior with Limited Information: Comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(4): 1078-1081.
7. CAG (Consejería de Agricultura y Ganadería), varios años. Anuario Agroalimentarios de Castilla y León. Consejería de Agricultura y Ganadería-Junta de Castilla y León, Valladolid.
8. Calatrava J, Garrido A, 2001. Análisis del efecto de los mercados de agua sobre el beneficio de las explotaciones, la contaminación por nitratos y el empleo eventual agrario. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales 2: 149-169.
9. CE (Comisión Europea), 2000. Política de tarifación y uso sostenible de los recursos hídricos. Documento COM (2000) 477 final.
10. CE (Comisión Europea), 2007. Prospects for agricultural markets and income in the European Union 2006-2013. Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development-European Commission, Bruselas.
11. Day RH, 1963. On aggregating linear programming models of production. Journal of Farm Economics 45: 797-813.
12. García Álvarez-Coque JM (ed.), 2006. La Reforma de la Política Agraria Común. Eumedia-MAPA, Madrid.
13. Gómez-Limón JA, Arriaza M, Berbel J, 2002. Conflicting implementation of agricultural and water policies in irrigated areas in the EU. Journal of Agricultural Economics 53: 259-281.
14. Gómez-Limón JA, Riesgo L, Arriaza M, 2004. Multi-Criteria analysis of input use in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics 55: 541-564.
15. Gómez-Limón JA, Riesgo L, 2004. Irrigation water pricing: differential impacts on irrigated farms. Agricultural Economics 31: 47-66.
16. Hazell PBR, Norton RD, 1986. Mathematical programming for economic analysis in agriculture. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York.
17. Heckelei T, 1997. Positive Mathematical Programming: review of the standard approach. CAPRI Working paper 97-103, Institute of Agricultural Policy, University of Bonn.
18. Heckelei T, Britz W, 2000. Positive Mathematical Programming with multiple data points: a cross-sectional estimation procedure. Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales 57: 28-50.
19. Heckelei T, Britz, W, 2005. Models based on positive mathematical programming: state of the art and further extensions. En Arfini F, (ed.) Modelling agricultural policies: State of the art and new challenges. Monte Università Parma, Parma: 48-74.
20. Heckelei T, Wolff H, 2003. Estimation of constrained optimisation models for agricultural supply analysis based on generalised Maximum Entropy. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(1): 27-50.
21. Henry de Frahan B, Buysse J, Polomé P, Fernagut B, Harmignie O, Lauwers L, van Huylenbroeck G, Van Meensel J, 2007. Positive mathematical programming for agricultural and environmental policy analysis: Review and practice. En Weintraub A, Romero C, Bjorndal T, Epstein R, (eds.) Handbook on Operations Research in Natural Resources. Springer, New York: 129-154.
22. Howitt RE, 1995. Positive Mathematical Programming. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77: 329-342.
23. Judéz L, Chaya C, Martínez S, González A, 2001. Effects of the measures envisaged in "Agenda 2000" on arable crop producers and beef and veal producers: an application of Positive Mathematical Programming to representative farms of a Spanish region. Agricultural Systems 67: 121-138.
24. MAPA (Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación), 2001. Plan Nacional de Regadíos. MAPA, Madrid.
25. Massaruto A, 2002. The full-cost recovery of irrigation: rationale, methodology, European experience. International Conference on Irrigation Water Policies: Micro and Macro Considerations. World Bank-FAO-International Water and Resource Economics Consortium (IWREC), 24-27 de junio, Agadir (Marruecos).
26. MIMAM (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente), 2000. Libro blanco del agua. MIMAM, Madrid.
27. MIMAM (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente), 2007. Precios y costes de los servicios de agua en España. MIMAM, Madrid.
28. OCDE (Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico), 2001. Environmental indicators for agriculture. Volume 3. Methods and results. OCDE, París.
29. OCDE-FAO (Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico-Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura), 2007. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016. OCDE-FAO, París
30. Oñate JJ, Atance I, Bardají I, Lluvia D, 2007. Modelling the effects of alternative CAP policies for the Spanish high-nature value cerealsteppe farming systems. Agricultural Systems 94: 247-260.
31. Paris Q, 2001. Symmetric Positive Equilibrium Problem: A framework for rationalizing economic behavior with limited information. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(4): 1049-1061.
32. Paris Q, Howitt RE, 1998. An analysis of ill-posed production problems using Maximum Entropy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1): 124-138.
33. Riesgo L, Gómez-Limón JA, 2006. Multi-criteria policy scenario for public regulation of irrigated agriculture. Agricultural Systems 91: 1-28.
34. Röhm, O, Dabbert S, 2003. Integrating Agri-Environmental Programs into Regional Production Models: An extension of positive mathematical programming. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(1): 254-265.