Computationally probing drug-protein interactions via support vector machine

Letters in Drug Design and Discovery

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 370-378

  Wang, Yong Cui ^a   Yang, Zhi Xia ^b   Wang, Yong ^c   Deng, Nai Yang ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b XINJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Chemical structure; Drug target interaction; Imbalance problem; Protein sequence; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

ACETYL COENZYME A ACYLTRANSFERASE; ARACHIDONATE 5 LIPOXYGENASE; CELL NUCLEUS RECEPTOR; CHLORZOXAZONE; CILOMILAST; CYTOCHROME P450; DIFLUNISAL; ENZYME; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; HYDROFLUMETHIAZIDE; ION CHANNEL; LEFLUNOMIDE; METHIONINE ADENOSYLTRANSFERASE; MICONAZOLE; PHOSPHOLIPASE A1; SEVOFLURANE; TERBINAFINE; TRICHLORMETHIAZIDE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; DRUG CONFORMATION; DRUG PROTEIN BINDING; GOLD STANDARD; MACHINE LEARNING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

EID: 77953710597     PISSN: 15701808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157018010791163433     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Li, Q.L.; Lai, L.H. Prediction of potential drug targets based on simple sequence properties. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007, 8, 353-364.
2. Haggarty, S.J.; Koeller, K.M.; Wong, J.C.; Butcher, R.A.; Schreiber, S.L. Multidimensional chemical genetic analysis of diversity-oriented synthesis-derived deacetylase inhibitors using cell-based assays. Chem. Biol., 2003, 10, 383-396.
3. Kuruvilla, F.G.; Shamji, A.F.; Sternson, S.M.; Hergenrother, P.J.; Schreiber, S.L. Dissecting glucose signalling with diversity-oriented synthesis and small-molecule microarrays. Nature, 2002, 416, 653-657.
4. Drews, J. Drug discovery: a historical perspective. Science, 2000, 287(5460), 1960-1964.
5. Hopkins, A,L.; Groom, C.R. The druggable genome. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 2002, 1(9), 727-730.
6. Overington, J.P.; Al-Lazikani, B.; Hopkins, A.L. How many drug targets are there? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 2006, 5(12), 993-996.
7. Russ, A.P.; Lampel, S. The druggable genome: an update. Drug Discov. Today, 2005, 10(23-24), 1607-1610.
8. Chen, X.; Ji, Z.L.; Chen, Y.Z. TTD: Therapeutic Target Database. Nucleic Acids Res., 2002, 30, 412-415.
9. Wishart, D.S.; Knox, C.; Guo, A.C.; Cheng, D.; Shrivastava, S.; Tzur, D.; Gautam, B.; Hassanali, M. Drugbank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res., 2008, 36, D901-D906.
10. Gao, Z.T.; Li, H.L.; Zhang, H.L.; Liu, X.F.; Kang, L.; Luo, X.M.; Zhu, W.L.; Chen, K.X.; Wang, X.C.; Jiang, H.L. PDTD: a web-accessible protein database for drug target identification. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008, 9, 104-111.
11. Arcuri, H.A.; Zafalon, G.F.; Marucci, E.A.; Bonalumi, C.E.; da Silveira, N.J.; Machado, J.M.; de Azevedo, W.F. Jr.; Palma, M.S. SKPDB: a structural database of shikimate pathway enzymes. BMC Bioinformatics, 2010, 11, 1-12.
12. Dobson, C.M. Chemical space and biology. Nature, 2004, 432, 824-828.
13. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Hattori, M.; Aoki-Kinoshita, K.F.; Itoh, M.; Kawashima, S.; Katayama, T.; Araki, M.; Hirakawa, M. From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in kegg. Nucleic Acids Res., 2006, 34, D354-D357.
14. Schomburg, I.; Chang, A.; Ebeling, C.; Gremse, M.; Heldt, C.; Huhn, G.; Schomburg, D. Brenda, the enzyme database: updates and major new developments. Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, 32, D431-D433.
15. Günther, S.; Kuhn, M.; Dunkel, M.; Campillos, M.; Senger, C.; Petsalaki, E.; Ahmed, J.; Urdiales, E.G.; Gewiess, A.; Jensen, L.J.; Schneider, R.; Skoblo, R.; Russell, R.B.; Bourne, P.E.; Bork, P.; Preissner, R. Supertarget and matador: resources for exploring drug{target relationships. Nucleic Acids Res., 2008, 36, D919-D922.
16. Yamanishi, Y.; Araki, M.; Gutteridge, A.; Honda, W.; Kanehisa, M. Prediction of drug-target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces. Bioinformatics, 2008, 24, i232-i240.
17. Hattori, M.; Okuno, Y.; Goto, S.; Kanehisa, M. Development of a chemical structure comparison method for integrated analysis of chemical and genomic information in the metabolic pathways. J. Am. Chem., 2003, 125, 11853-11865.
18. Smith, T.F.; Waterman, M. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol., 1981, 147, 195-197.
19. Wu, G.; Chang, E.Y. Class-boundary alignment for imbalanced dataset learning. In ICML Workshop on Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets, 2003.
20. Zhao, X.M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.N.; Aihara, K. Gene function prediction using labeled and unlabeled data. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008, 57-71.
21. Hsu, C.W.; Chang, C.C.; Lin, C.J. A practical guide to Support Vector Classification. Available from: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin, 2007.
22. Gribskov, M.; Robinson, N.L. Use of receiver operating characteristic (roc) analysis to evaluate sequence matching. Comput. Chem., 1996, 20, 25-33.
23. Brown, M.; Grundy, W. N.; Lin, D.; Cristianini, N.; Sugnet, C.; Ares, M.; Haussler, D. Support Vector Machine Classification of Microarray Gene Expression Data. 1999, UCSC-CRL-99-09.
24. Ben-Hur, A.; Noble, W.S. Kernel methods for predicting protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21, i38-i46.