Correction: Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: Clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentives (BMJ (2010) 340 (c2220) DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c2220);Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: Clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentives

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 340, Issue 7759, 2010, Pages 1291-

  Banerjee, Abhijit Vinayak ^a   Duflo, Esther ^a   Glennerster, Rachel ^a   Kothari, Dhruva ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Mailbox #67 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BCG VACCINE; DIPHTHERIA PERTUSSIS TETANUS VACCINE; MEASLES VACCINE; ORAL POLIOMYELITIS VACCINE;

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPHTHERIA; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH SURVEY; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; IMMUNIZATION; INDIA; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASLES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERTUSSIS; POLIOMYELITIS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; RISK FACTOR; RURAL AREA; TETANUS; TUBERCULOSIS;

EID: 77953710494     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i6423     Document Type: Erratum

References (27)

1. WHO and UNICEF. Global immunization vision and strategy. World Health Organization, 2005. www.who.int/vaccines-documents/ DocsPDF05/GIVS-Final-EN.pdf.
2. Bloom D, Canning D, Weston M. The value of vaccination. World Economics 2005;6:15-39.
3. WHO and UNICEF. Global immunization data. World Health Organization, 2008. www.who.int/immunization/newsroom/ Global-Immunization-Data.pdf.
4. Lim SS, Stein DB, Charrow A, Murray CJ. Tracking progress towards universal childhood immunisation and the impact of global initiatives: a systematic analysis of three-dose diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis immunisation coverage. Lancet 2008;372:2031-46.
5. Coutinho L, Bisht S, Raje G. Numerical narratives and documentary practices: vaccines, targets and reports ofimmunisation programme. Econ Polit Wkly 2000;35:656-66.
6. National Family Health Survey, 2005-2006 (NHFS-3).www.nfhsindia. org/pdf/RJ.pdf.
7. Grabowski M, Farrell N, Hawley W, Chimumbwa J, Nobiya T, Ahun M, et al. Ghana and Zambia: achieving equity in the distribution of insecticide-treated bednets through links with measles vaccination campaigns. Health, nutrition, and population (HNP) discussion paper. World Bank, 2005.
8. Wiysonge CS, Nomo E, Mawo JNN, Ticha JM. Accelerated measles control in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet 2006;367:394-5.
9. Loevinsohn BP, Loevinsohn ME. Well child clinics and mass vaccination campaigns: an evaluation of strategies for improving the coverage of primary health care in a developing country. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:1407-11.
10. Rivera JA, Sotres-Alvarez D, Habicht JP, Shamah T, Villalpando S. Impact of the Mexican program for education, health, and nutrition (Progresa) on rates of growth and anemia in infants and young children: a randomized effectiveness study. JAMA 2004;291:2563-70.
11. Lagarde M, Haines A, Palmer N. Conditional cash transfers for improving uptake of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. JAMA 2007;298:1900-10.
12. Fernald LCH, Gertler PJ, Neufeld LM. Role of cash in conditional cash transfer programmes for child health, growth, and development: an analysis of Mexico's Oportunidades. Lancet 2008;371:828-37.
13. Glassman A, Todd J, Gaarder M. Latin America: cash transfers to support better household decisions. In: Eichler R, Levine R, eds. Performance-based incentives working group. performance incentives for global health: potential and pitfalls. Brookings Institution Press, 2009:89-121.
14. Maluccio J, Flores R. Impact evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program: the Nicaraguan Red de Proteccion Social. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division (FCND) Discussion Paper No 184. International Food Policy Research Institute, 2004.
15. Banerjee A, Deaton A, Duflo E.Health care delivery in rural Rajasthan. Econ Polit Wkly 2004;39:944-9.
16. WHO. Selected vaccine introduction status into routine immunization. World Health Organization, 2003. www.who.int/ immunization-monitoring/routine/ schedule-analysis-2003.pdf.
17. Nichter M. Vaccinations in the third world: a consideration of community demand. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:617-32.
18. Atkinson W, Pickering L, Schwartz B, Weniger B, Iskander J, Watson J. General recommendations on immunization. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002;51:1-36.
19. Thornton R. The demand for and impact of learning HIV status: Evidence from a field experiment. Am Econ Rev 2008;98:1829-63.
20. Filmer D, Schady N. Are there diminishing returns to transfer size in conditional cash transfers? Policy Research Working Paper Series 4999. World Bank, 2009.
21. Kremer M, Miguel E. The illusion of sustainability. Q J Econ 2007;122:1007-65.
22. Cohen J, Dupas P. Free distribution or cost-sharing? Evidence from a randomized malaria prevention experiment. Brookings Global Economy and Development Working Paper No 11. Brookings Institute, 2007.
23. Morris SS, Flores F, Olinto P, Medina JM.Monetary incentives in primary health care and effects on use and coverage of preventive health care interventions in rural Honduras: cluster randomized trial. Lancet 2004;364:2030-7.
24. Martins N, Morris P, Kelly PM. Food incentives toimprovecompletion of tuberculosis treatment: randomised controlled trial in Dili, Timor- Leste. BMJ 2009;339:b4248.
25. Health Budget 2006-07: new directions? Express Healthcare Management 2006;April. www.expresshealthcaremgmt.com/200604/ budgetanalysis01.shtml
26. Shea B, Neil A, David H. Increasing the demand for childhood vaccination in developing countries: a systematic review. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2009;9(suppl I):S5.
27. Travis P, Bennet S, Haines A, Pang T, Bhutta Z, Hyder AA, et al. Overcoming health systems constraints to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. Lancet 2004;364:900-6.