Multisensory conflict modulates the spread of visual attention across a multisensory object

NeuroImage

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 606-616

  Zimmer, Ulrike ^a   Roberts, Kenneth C ^a   Harshbarger, Todd B ^b   Woldorff, Marty G ^a,c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CINGULATE GYRUS; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SENSORY CORTEX; SENSORY EVALUATION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTEER; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; HEARING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953694598     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.245     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abrams R.A., Law M.B. Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Percept. Psychophys. 2000, 62:818-833.
2. Billington J., Baron-Cohen S., Bor D. Systemizing influences attentional processes during the Navon task: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:511-520.
3. Burock M.A., Buckner R.L., Woldorff M.G., Rosen B.R., Dale A.M. Randomized event-related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI. NeuroReport 1998, 9:3735-3739.
4. Busse L., Roberts K.C., Crist R.E., Weissman D.H., Woldorff M.G. The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:18751-18756.
5. Christensen M.S., Ramsøy T.Z., Lund T.E., Madsen K.H., Rowe J.B. An fMRI study of the neural correlates of graded visual perception. Neuroimage 2006, 31:1711-1725.
6. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:201-215.
7. Crottaz-Herbette S., Menon V. Where and when the anterior cingulate cortex modulates attentional response: combined fMRI and ERP evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:766-780.
8. Dalton P., Spence C. Attentional capture in serial audiovisual search tasks. Percept. Psychophys. 2007, 69:422-438.
9. Dorsaint-Pierre, R., Penhune, V.B., Watkins, K.E., Neelin, P., Lerch, J.P., Bouffard, M., Zatorre, R.J., 2006. Asymmetries of the planum temporale and Heschl's gyrus: relationship to language lateralization. Brain 129, 1164-1176.
10. Egly R., Driver J., Rafal R.D. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1994, 123:161-177.
11. Egner T., Hirsch J. The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task. Neuroimage 2005, 24:539-547.
12. Fairhall S.L., Macaluso E. Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites. Eur. J. NeuroSci. 2009, 29:1247-1257.
13. Fan J., Flombaum J.I., McCandliss B.D., Thomas K.M., Posner M.I. Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. Neuroimage 2003, 18:42-57.
14. Fan J., Hof P.R., Guise K.G., Fossella J.A., Posner M.I. The functional integration of the anterior cingulate cortex during conflict processing. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:796-805.
15. Fiebelkorn I.C., Foxe J.J., Molholm S. Dual mechanisms for the cross-sensory spread of attention: how much do learned associations matter?. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:109-120.
16. Friston K.J., Ashburner J., Frith C.D., Poline J.-B., Heather J.D., Frackowiak R.S.J. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1995, 2:165-189.
17. Friston, K.J., Fletcher, P., Josephs, O., Holmes, A., Rugg, D., Turner, R., 1998. Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses. NeuroImage 7, 30-40.
18. Hocking J., Price C.J. The role of the posterior superior temporal sulcus in audiovisual processing. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:2439-2449.
19. Jankowiak S., Berti S. Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:79-85.
20. Macaluso E., Frith C.D., Driver J. Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. Science 2000, 289:1206-1208.
21. Mazziotta, J.C., Toga, A.W., Evans, A., Fox, P., Lancaster, J., 1995. A Probabilistic atlas of the human brain: theory and rationale for its development. NeuroImage 2:89-101.
22. Miller L.M., D'Esposito M. Perceptual fusion and stimulus coincidence in the cross-modal integration of speech. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:5884-5893.
23. Molholm S., Martinez A., Shpaner M., Foxe J.J. Object-based attention is multisensory: co-activation of an object's representations in ignored sensory modalities. Eur. J. NeuroSci. 2007, 26:499-509.
24. Morosan P., Rademacher J., Schleicher A., Amunts K., Schormann T., Zilles K. Human primary auditory cortex: cytoarchitectonic subdivisions and mapping into a spatial reference system. Neuroimage 2001, 13:684-701.
25. Müller N.G., Kleinschmidt A. Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:9812-9816.
26. Murase M., Saito D.N., Kochiyama T., Tanabe H.C., Tanaka S., Harada T., Aramaki Y., Honda M., Sadato N. Cross-modal integration during vowel identification in audiovisual speech: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci. Lett. 2008, 434:71-76.
27. Noesselt T., Bergmann D., Hake M., Heinze H.J., Fendrich R. Sound increases the saliency of visual events. Brain Res. 2008, 1220:157-163.
28. Noppeney U., Josephs O., Hocking J., Price C.J., Friston K.J. The effect of prior visual information on recognition of speech and sounds. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:598-609.
29. Penhune V.B., Zatorre R.J., MacDonald J.D., Evans A.C. Interhemispheric anatomical differences in human primary auditory cortex: probabilistic mapping and volume measurement from magnetic resonance scans. Cereb. Cortex 1996, 6:661-672.
30. Picard N., Strick P.L. Imaging the premotor areas. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001, 11:663-672.
31. Poldrack R. Tools of the trade: region of interest analysis for fMRI. SCAN 2007, 2:67-70.
32. Rademacher J., Morosan P., Schormann T., Schleicher A., Werner C., Freund H.J., Zilles K. Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement of human primary auditory cortex. Neuroimage 2001, 13:669-683.
33. Sabri M., Liebenthal E., Waldron E.J., Medler D.A., Binder J.R. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:689-700.
34. Sadaghiani S., Maier J.X., Noppeney U. Natural, metaphoric, and linguistic auditory direction signals have distinct influences on visual motion processing. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:6490-6499.
35. Tzourio N., Nkanga-Ngila B., Mazoyer B. Left planum temporale surface correlates with functional dominance during story listening. NeuroReport 1998, 9:829-833.
36. Uncapher M.R., Rugg M.D. Effects of divided attention on fMRI correlates of memory encoding. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:1923-1935.
37. van Atteveldt N., Formisano E., Goebel R., Blomert L. Integration of letters and speech sounds in the human brain. Neuron 2004, 43:271-282.
38. van Atteveldt N.M., Formisano E., Goebel R., Blomert L. Top-down task effects overrule automatic multisensory responses to letter-sound pairs in auditory association cortex. Neuroimage 2007, 36:1345-1360.
39. van Veen V., Carter C.S. Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study. Neuroimage 2005, 27:497-504.
40. Wall M.B., Walker R., Smith A.T. Functional imaging of the human superior colliculus: an optimised approach. Neuroimage 2009, 47:1620-1627.
41. Watkins S., Dalton P., Lavie N., Rees G. Brain mechanisms mediating auditory attentional capture in humans. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:1694-1700.
42. Weissman D.H., Giesbrecht B., Song A.W., Mangun G.R., Woldorff M.G. Conflict monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex during selective attention to global and local object features. Neuroimage 2003, 19:1361-1368.
43. Weissman D.H., Warner L.M., Woldorff M.G. The neural mechanisms for minimizing cross-modal distraction. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:10941-10949.
44. Weissman D.H., Warner L.M., Woldorff M.G. Momentary reductions of attention permit greater processing of irrelevant stimuli. Neuroimage 2009, 48:609-615.
45. Zimmer U., Macaluso E. Processing of multisensory spatial congruency can be dissociated from working memory and visuo-spatial attention. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 26:1681-1691.