Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the hydrostatic Euler equations on a bounded domain with analytic data;Existence locale et unicité de solutions de l'équation d'Euler hydrostatique dans un ouvert borné avec des données analytiques.

Comptes Rendus Mathematique

Volumn 348, Issue 11-12, 2010, Pages 639-645

  Kukavica, Igor ^a   Temam, Roger ^b   Vicol, Vlad ^a   Ziane, Mohammed ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953687094     PISSN: 1631073X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2010.03.023     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bardos C., Benachour S. Domaine d'analycité des solutions de l'équation d'Euler dans un ouvert de Rn. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 1977, 4:647-687.
2. Bardos C., Benachour S., Zerner M. Analyticité des solutions périodiques de l'équation d'Euler en deux dimensions. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B 1976, 282(17):A995-A998. Aiii.
3. Brenier Y. Homogeneous hydrostatic flows with convex velocity profiles. Nonlinearity 1999, 12:495-512.
4. Grenier E. On the derivation of homogeneous hydrostatic equations. M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 1999, 33(5):965-970.
5. Kukavica I., Vicol V. On the radius of analyticity of solutions to the three-dimensional Euler equations. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2009, 137:669-677.
6. I. Kukavica, V. Vicol, The domain of analyticity of solutions to the three-dimensional Euler equations in a half space, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A, in press.
7. I. Kukavica, R. Temam, V. Vicol, M. Ziane, Local existence and uniqueness for the hydrostatic Euler equations on a bounded domain, preprint.
8. Lions P.-L. Mathematical Topics in Fluid Mechanics, vol. 1. Incompressible Models. Oxford Lecture Ser. Math. Appl. 1996, vol. 3. Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Lions J.-L., Temam R., Wang S. New formulations of the primitive equations of atmosphere and applications. Nonlinearity 1992, 5(2):237-288.
10. Levermore C.D., Oliver M. Analyticity of solutions for a generalized Euler equation. J. Differential Equations 1997, 133(2):321-339.
11. Lombardo M.C., Cannone M., Sammartino M. Well-posedness of the boundary layer equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 2003, 35(4):987-1004.
12. Pedlosky J. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics 1987, Springer-Verlag, New York.
13. Renardy M. Ill-posedness of the hydrostatic Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 2009, 194:877-886.
14. Rousseau A., Temam R., Tribbia J. Boundary conditions for the 2D linearized PEs of the ocean in the absence of viscosity. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A 2005, 13(5):1257-1276.
15. Rousseau A., Temam R., Tribbia J. The 3D primitive equations in the absence of viscosity: Boundary conditions and well-posedness in the linearized case. J. Math. Pures Appl. 2008, 89:297-319.
16. Oliger J., Sundström A. Theoretical and practical aspects of some initial boundary value problems in fluid dynamics. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 1978, 35(3):419-446.
17. Sammartino M., Caflisch R.E. Zero viscosity limit for analytic solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation on a half-space, I. Existence for Euler and Prandtl equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 1998, 192:433-461.
18. Temam R. On the Euler equations of incompressible perfect fluids. J. Funct. Anal. 1975, 20(1):32-43.
19. Temam R., Ziane M. Some mathematical problems in geophysical fluid dynamics. Handbook of Mathematical Fluid Dynamics, vol. III 2004, 535-657. North-Holland, Amsterdam.