Embryonic gene expression among pollutant resistant and sensitive Fundulus heteroclitus populations

Aquatic Toxicology

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 221-229

  Bozinovic, Goran ^a   Oleksiak, Marjorie F ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

Developmental stages; Embryo gene expression; Fundulus heteroclitus; Microarrays

Indexed keywords

POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON;

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BIOCHEMISTRY; EMBRYO; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; ESTUARINE ECOSYSTEM; ESTUARINE POLLUTION; FISH; GENE EXPRESSION; MORPHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; POLLUTION TOLERANCE; POPULATION ECOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUPERFUND;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO (ANATOMY); EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYOTOXICITY; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; ESTUARY; FISH; FUNDULUS HETEROCLITUS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HEART RATE; NONHUMAN; NORTH AMERICA; ORGANOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE SIZE; TISSUE SPECIFICITY; WATER POLLUTION;

ANIMALS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FUNDULIDAE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GEOGRAPHY; HEART RATE; NORTH AMERICA; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

NORTH AMERICA;

FUNDULUS HETEROCLITUS;

EID: 77953686022     PISSN: 0166445X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.02.022     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adams S.M., Lindmeier J.B., Duvernell D.D. Microsatellite analysis of the phylogeography, Pleistocene history and secondary contact hypotheses for the killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:1109-1123.
2. Armstrong P.B., Child J.S. Stages of normal development of Fundulus heteroclitus. Biol. Bull. 1965, 128:143-168.
3. Bickham J.W., Sandhu S., Hebert P.D., Chikhi L., Athwal R. Effects of chemical contaminants on genetic diversity in natural populations: implications for biomonitoring and ecotoxicology. Mutat. Res. 2000, 463:33-51.
4. Bickham J.W., Smolen M.J. Somatic and heritable effects of environmental genotoxins and the emergence of evolutionary toxicology. Environ. Health Perspect. 1994, 102(Suppl. 12):25-28.
5. Burnett K.G., Bain L.J., Baldwin W.S., Callard G.V., Cohen S., Di Giulio R.T., Evans D.H., Gomez-Chiarri M., Hahn M.E., Hoover C.A., Karchner S.I., Katoh F., Maclatchy D.L., Marshall W.S., Meyer J.N., Nacci D.E., Oleksiak M.F., Rees B.B., Singer T.D., Stegeman J.J., Towle D.W., Van Veld P.A., Vogelbein W.K., Whitehead A., Winn R.N., Crawford D.L. Fundulus as the premier teleost model in environmental biology: opportunities for new insights using genomics. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D: Genomics Proteomics 2007, 2:257-286.
6. Cronin M.A., Bickham J.W. A population genetic analysis of the potential for a crude oil spill to induce heritable mutations and impact natural populations. Ecotoxicology 1998, 7:259-278.
7. Dieter M.P. Identification and quantification of pollutants that have the potential to affect evolutionary processes. Environ. Health Perspect. 1993, 101:278.
8. DiMichele L., Powers D.A. LDH-B genotype-specific hatching times of Fundulus heteroclitus embryos. Nature 1982, 296:563-564.
9. DiMichele L., Westerman M.E. Geographic variation in development rate between populations of the teleost Fundulus hetericlitus. Mar. Biol. 1997, 128:1-7.
10. Elskus A.A., Monosson E., McElroy A.E., Stageman J.J., Woltering D.S. Altered CYP1A expression in Fundulus heteroclitus adults and larvae: a sign of pollutant resistance?. Aquat. Toxicol. 1999, 45:99-113.
11. Endler J.A. Natural Selection in the Wild 1986, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
12. Fisher M.A., Oleksiak M.F. Convergence and divergence in gene expression among natural populations exposed to pollution. BMC Genomics 2007, 8:108.
13. Fox G.A. Effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals on wildlife in Canada: past, present, and future. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 2001, 36:233-251.
14. Hackstadt A.J., Hess A.M. Filtering for increased power for microarray data analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10:11.
15. Herbert P., Luiker M. Genetic effects of contaminant exposure-towards an assessment of impacts on animal populations. Sci. Total Environ. 1996, 191:23-58.
16. Hofelt C.S., Shea D. Accumulation of organochlorine pesticides and PCBs by semipermeable membrane devices and Mytilus edulis in New Bedford Harbor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31:154-159.
17. Hsiao S.M., Greeley M.S.J., Wallace R.A. Reproductive cycling in female Fundulus heteroclitus. Biol. Bull. 1994, 186:271-284.
18. Jin W., Riley R.M., Wolfinger R.D., White K.P., Passador-Gurgel G., Gibson G. The contributions of sex, genotype and age to transcriptional variance in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 2001, 29:389-395.
19. Kerr K., Churchill G. Experimental design for gene expression analysis. Biostatistics 2001, 2:183-201.
20. Kerr M., Churchill G. Experimental design for gene expression microarrays. Biostatistics 2001, 2:183-201.
21. Long E.R., Wolfe D.A., Scott K.J., Thursby G.B., Stern E.A., Peven C., Schwartz T. Magnitude and Extent of Sediment Toxicity in the Hudson-Raritan Estuary 1995.
22. Lotrich V.A. Summer home range and movements of Fundulus heteroclitus (Family: Cyprinonodontidae) in a tidal creek. Ecology 1975, 56:191-198.
23. Luellen D.R., Shea D. Calibration and field verification of semipermeable membrane devices for measuring polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:1791-1797.
24. McMillan A.M., Bagley M.J., Jackson S.A., Nacci D.E. Genetic diversity and structure of an estuarine fish (Fundulus heteroclitus) indigenous to sites associated with a highly contaminated urban harbor. Ecotoxicology 2006, 15:539-548.
25. Meyer J.N., Nacci D.E., Di Giulio R.T. Cytochrome P450A (CYP1A)in Killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus): heritability of altered expression and relationship to survival in contaminated sediments. Toxicol. Sci. 2002, 68:69-81.
26. Meyer J.N., Smith J.D., Winstin G.W., Di Giulio R.T. Antioxidant defenses in killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) exposed to contaminated sediments and model prooxidants: short-term and heritable responses. Aquat. Toxicol. 2003, 65:377-395.
27. Mulvey M., Newman M.C., Vogelbein W.K., Unger M.A., Ownby D.R. Genetic structure and mtDNA diversity of Fundulus heteroclitus populations from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated sites. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2003, 22:671-677.
28. Nacci D.E., Coiro L., Champlin D., Jayaraman S., Mckinney R., Gleason T.R., Munns W.R., Specker J.L., Cooper K.R. Adaptation of wild populations of the estuarine fish Fundulus heteroclitus to persistant environmental contaminants. Mar. Biol. 1999, 134:9-17.
29. Oleksiak M.F. Changes in gene expression due to chronic exposure to environmental pollutants. Aquat. Toxicol. 2008, 90:161-171.
30. Oleksiak M.F., Churchill G.A., Crawford D.L. Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations. Nat. Genet. 2002, 32:261-266.
31. Oleksiak M.F., Roach J.L., Crawford D.L. Natural variation in cardiac metabolism and gene expression in Fundulus heteroclitus. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37:67-72.
32. Oppenheimer J.M. The normal stages of Fundulus heteroclitus. Anat. Rec. 1937, 68:1-15.
33. Ownby D.R., Newman M.C., Mulvey M., Vogelbein W.K., Unger M.A., Arzayus L.F. Fish (Fundulus heteroclitus) populations with different exposure histories differ in tolerance of creosote-contaminated sediments. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2002, 21:1897-1902.
34. A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Selectionist/Neutralist Contraversy Using the Model Teleost, Fundulus heteroclitus 1993, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. D.A. Powers, M. Smith, I. Gonzalez-Villasenor, L. DiMichele, D.L. Crawford, G. Bernardi, T.A. Lauerman (Eds.).
35. Prince R., Cooper K.R. Comparison of the effect of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on chemically impacted and nonimpacted subpopulations of Fundulus heteroclitus: II. Metabolic considerations. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1995, 14:589-595.
36. Roark S.A., Nacci D., Coiro L., Champlin D., Guttman S.I. Population genetic structure of a nonmigratory estuarine fish (Fundulus heteroclitus) across a strong gradient of polychlorinated biphenyl contamination. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24:717-725.
37. Scott C.P., VanWye J., McDonald M.D., Crawford D.L. Technical analysis of cDNA microarrays. PLoS One 2009, 4:e4486.
38. Scott C.P., Williams D.A., Crawford D.L. The effect of genetic and environmental variation on metabolic gene expression. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:2832-2843.
39. Selman K., Wallace R.A. Oogenesis in Fundulus heteroclitus. III. Vitellogenesis. J. Exp. Zool. 1983, 226:441-457.
40. Smith G.M., Weis S.J. Predator-prey relationships in mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus): effects of living in a polluted environment. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1997, 209:75-87.
41. Sweeney J., Deegan L., Gattitt R. Population size and site fidelity of Fundulus heteroclitus in a macrotidal saltmarsh creek. Biol. Bull. 1998, 195:238-239.
42. Vogelbein W.K., Fournie J.W., Van Veld P.A., Huggett R.J. Hepatic neoplasms in the mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus from a creosote-contaminated site. Cancer Res. 1990, 50:5978-5986.
43. Weis J.S., Smith G.M., Zhou T. Altered predator/pray behavior in polluted environments: implications for conservation. Environ. Biol. Fish. 1999, 55:43-51.
44. Weis J.S., Weis P. Effects of environmental pollutants on early fish development. Rev. Aquat. Sci. 1989, 1:45-73.
45. Whitehead A., Crawford D.L. Neutral and adaptive variation in gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:5425-5430.
46. Williams L.M., Oleksiak M.F. Signatures of selection in natural populations adapted to chronic pollution. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:282.
47. Wirgin I., Waldman J.R. Resistance to contaminants in North American fish populations. Mutat. Res. 2004, 552:73-100.
48. Wolfe D.A., Long E.R., Thursby G.B. Sediment toxicity in the Hudson-Raritan Estuary: distribution and correlations with chemical contamination. Estuaries 1996, 19:901-912.
49. Wolfinger R.D., Gibson G., Wolfinger E.D., Bennett L., Hamadeh H., Bushel P., Afshari C., Paules R.S. Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models. J. Comput. Biol. 2001, 8:625-637.
50. Wu H., Kerr K., Cui X., Churchill G. MAANOVA: a software package for the analysis of spotted cDNA microarray experiments. The Analysis of Gene Expression Data: Methods and Software 2003.