Indigenous peoples as international political actors: a summary

Polar Record

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 264-270

  Tennberg, Monica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAPLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL INFLUENCE; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION; POLAR REGION; POLITICAL CHANGE; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; POWER RELATIONS;

ARCTIC;

EID: 77953651849     PISSN: 00322474     EISSN: 14753057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0032247409990398     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arts, B., M. Noortmann, and R. Reinalda. 2002. Nonstate actors in international relations. Aldershot: Ashgate.
2. Forrest, S. 2006. Indigenous self-determination in Finland: a case study in normative change. Polar Record 42(222): 229-238.
3. Foucault, M. 2007. Security, territory, population. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
4. Dean, M., and B. Hindess. 1998. Introduction: government, liberalism, society. In: Dean, M., and B. Hindess (editors).Governing Australia: studies in contemporary rationalities of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Franke, U., and U. Roos. 2005. From collective actor to structure of collective acting. The meaning of human beings for the study of international relations. Istanbul, Budapest (paper prepared for presentation at the first World International Studies Conference in Istanbul, 24-27 August 2005, and the third Conference for the European Consortium for Political Research in Budapest, 8-10 September 2005).
6. Koivurova, T., and L. Heinäm̈aki. 2006. The participation of indigenous peoples in international normmaking in the Arctic. Polar Record 42(221): 101-109.
7. Koivurova, T. 2008. The draft Nordic Saami Convention: nations working together. International Community Law Review 10: 279-293.
8. Kuppe, R. 2009. The three dimensions of the rights of indigenous peoples. International Community Law Review 11: 101-116.
9. Lawlor,M. 2003. Indigenous internationalism: native rights and the UN. Comparative American Studies 1: 351-369.
10. Lindroth, M. 2006. Indigenous-state relations in the UN: establishing the indigenous forum. Polar Record 42(222): 239-248.
11. Loukacheva, N. 2009. Arctic indigenous peoples' internationalism: in search of a legal justification.Polar Record 45(23): 51-58.
12. Mayall, J. 1990. Nationalism and international society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. McNay, L. 2000. Gender and agency. Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Moore, M. 2005. Internal minorities and indigenous selfdetermination. In: Eisenberg, A., and J. Spinner-Halev (editors). Minorities within minorities. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
15. Moreton-Robinson, A. 2006. Towards a new research agenda? Foucault, whiteness and indigenous sovereignty. Journal of Sociology 42: 383-395.
16. Morgan, R. 2004. Advancing indigenous rights at the United Nations: strategic framing and its impact on the normative development of international law. Social and Legal Studies 13: 481-500.
17. Okin, S.M. 2005. Multiculturalism and feminism: no simple question, no simple answer. In: Eisenberg, A., and J. Spinner-Halev (editors), Minorities within minorities. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
18. Pentik äinen, M. 2009. Creating an integrated society, managing diversity and human rights in Europe. In: Bloed, A., R. Hofmann, J. Marko, J. Maynall, and J. Packer (editors). European Yearbook of Minority Issues 2006-2007 vol6. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff: 329-368.
19. Rose, N., and P. Miller. 1992. Political power beyond the state: problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology 43(2): 172-205.
20. Sayer, A. 1999-2003. Long live post-disciplinary studies! Sociology and the curse of disciplinary parochialism/imperialism. Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Sociology. URL: http://www. comp.lancs.ac.uk/ sociology/papers/Sayer-Long-livepostdisciplinary-studies.pdf.
21. Shadian, J. 2006. Remaking Arctic governance: the construction of an Arctic Inuit polity. Polar Record 42(222): 249-259.
22. Shaw, K. 2002. Indigeneity and the International. Millennium 31: 55-81.
23. Semenova, T. 2006. Political mobilisation of northern indigenous peoples in Russia. Polar Record 43(224): 23-32.
24. Semenova, T. 2008a. Russian indigenous peoples as political actors. Rovaniemi: Arctic University of Lapland, Arctic Centre (guest lecture 8 December 2008).
25. Semenova, T. 2008b. Russian indigenous peoples of the north as political actors. Moscow (presentation at the INDIPO seminar 18 April 2008). URL: http://www. arcticcentre.org/includes/file-download.asp?deptid= 28277&fileid=15710&file=20090312112811.pdf&pdf =1
26. Sending, O.J., and I.B. Neumann, 2006. Governance to governmentality: analyzing NGOs, states and power. International Studies Quarterly 50: 651-672.
27. Sinevaara-Niskanen, H. 2007. Pohjoisen poliittisissa yhteis öissä. Arktinen Neuvosto ja alkuperäiskansojen naisten toiminnan tilat [In northern political communities. Arctic Council and indigenous women's spaces of action]. In: Keskitalo-Foley, S., M. Autti, P. Naskali, and H. Sinevaara-Niskanen (editors). Kuulumisia. Feministisi ä tulkintoja naisten toimijuuksista [Feminist interpretations of women's agencies]. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland: 102-128.
28. Smith, K.E.L. 2007. A review of the study of political status of indigenous peoples in the global context. Sociology Compass 1(2): 756-774.
29. Sylvester, C. 1996. The contributions of feminist theory to international relations. In: Smith, S., K. Booth, and M. Zalewski (editors). International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
30. Tennberg, M. 2000. Arctic environmental cooperation. A study in governmentality. Aldershot: Ashgate.
31. Tennberg, M. 2006. Indigenous peoples as international political actors: presenting the INDIPO project. Polar Record 42(221): 100