Effect of SO2 volume fraction in flue gas on the adsorption behaviors adsorbed by ZL50 activated carbon and kinetic analysis

Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1152-1159

  Gao, Ji Xian ^a   Wang, Tie Feng ^a   Wang, Jin Fu ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bangham's adsorptive reaction kinetic model; Flue gas desulphurization; Initial adsorption rate; Sulfur dioxide volume fraction; ZL50 activated carbon

Indexed keywords

CHARCOAL; COAL; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; GAS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; KINETICS; SMOKE;

ADSORPTION; CATALYSIS; CHARCOAL; COAL; GASES; KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; SMOKE; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

EID: 77953642069     PISSN: 02503301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. 2009, 28 (2): 325-333.
2. [P]. CN101274193A, 2008-10-01.
3. Olson D G, Tsuji K, Shiraishi I. The reduction of gas phase air toxics from combustion and incineration sources using the MET-Mitsui-BF activated coke process [J]. Fuel Process Technol, 2000, 65/66: 393-405.
4. 2008, 37 (9): 1-4, 9.
5. 2009, (3): 34-41.
6. 2006, 27 (5): 850-854.
7. 2004.
8. 2008, 29 (2): 99-102.
9. 2009, 9 (1): 18-22.
10. 2 removal by carbon [J]. Energ Fuel, 1997, 11: 284-291.
11. x over activated carbon fibers [J]. Carbon, 2000, 38 (2): 227-239.
12. 1997, 17 (3): 273-277.
13. 2009, 28 (2): 112-115, 126.
14. 2003.
15. 1998.
16. 2O [J]. Carbon, 2006, 44 (1): 46-60.
17. 1992, 13 (5): 67-70.
18. Otake T, Tone S, Yokota Y, et al. Kinetics of sulfur dioxide oxidation over activated carbon [J]. J Chem Eng Jpn, 1971, 4 (2): 155-159.
19. 1997, 17 (3): 268-272.
20. 2 over activated carbon coupled with partial liquid phase vaporization [J]. Chem Eng Sci, 1999, 54 (10): 1571-1576.
21. Bangham D H, Sever W. An Experimental investigation of the dynamical equation of the process of gas-sorption [J]. Phil Mag, 1925, 49 (6): 935-944.
22. 2001. 224.
23. Low M J D. Kinetics of chemisorption of gases on solids [J]. Chem Rev, 1960, 60 (3): 267-312.
24. Zhang J S, Stanforth R. Slow adsorption reaction between arsenic species and Goethite α-FeOOH): diffusion or heterogeneous surface reaction control [J]. Langmuir, 2005, 21 (7): 2895-2901.
25. Ho Y S, Ng J C, McKay G. Kinetics of pollutant sorption by biosorbents: Review [J]. Sep Purif ethods, 2000, 29 (2): 189-232.
26. Rudzinski W, Plazinski W. Studies of the kinetics of solute adsorption at solid/solution interfaces: on the possibility of distinguishing between the diffusional and the surface reaction kinetic models by studying the pseudo-first-order kinetics [J]. J Phys Chem C, 2007, 111: 15100-15110.
27. Ho Y S, Mckay G. A comparison of chemisorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents [J]. Trans IchemE (Part B), 1998, 76: 332-340.
28. Lagergren S. Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption gel ster stoffe [J]. K Sven Vetenskapsakad Handl, 1898, 24 (4): 1-39.
29. Boyd G E, Adamson A W, Myers L S. The exchange adsorption of ions from aqueous solutions by organic zeolites II: Kinetics [J]. J Am Chem Soc, 1947, 69 (11): 2836-2848.
30. Ho Y S, Mckay G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes [J]. Process Biochem, 1999, 34 (5): 451-465.
31. 2007, 28 (11): 2637-2641.
32. Acharya J, Sahu J N, Mohanty C R, et al. Removal of lead (II) from wastewater by activated carbon developed from tamarind wood by zinc chloride activation [J]. Chem Eng J, 2009, 149 (1-3): 249-262.