Development and validation of self-reported line drawings for assessment of knee malalignment and foot rotation: A cross-sectional comparative study

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Ingham, Sarah L ^a   Moody, Amanda ^a   Abhishek, Abhishek ^a   Doherty, Sally A ^a   Zhang, Weiya ^a   Doherty, Michael ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE MALFORMATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSIOLOGY; ROTATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; ROTATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77953637701     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-57     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis.[erratum appears in JAMA 2001 Aug 15;286(7):792]. L Sharma J Song DT Felson S Cahue E Shamiyeh DD Dunlop, JAMA 2001 286 188 195 10.1001/jama.286.2.188 11448282
2. erratum appears in JAMA 2001 Aug 15;286(7):792]
3. Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee.[see comment]. GM Brouwer AW van Tol AP Bergink JN Belo RM Bernsen M Reijman,, et al. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2007 56 1204 1211
4. Pressure distribution at the knee joint. Influence of varus and valgus deviation without and with ligament dissection. J Bruns M Volkmer S Luessenhop, Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery 1993 113 12 19
5. Lower limb alignment and foot angle are related to stance phase knee adduction in normal subjects: a critical analysis of the reliability of gait analysis data. M Andrews FR Noyes TE Hewett TP Andriacchi, Journal of Orthopaedic Research 1996 14 289 295 10.1002/jor.1100140218 8648508
6. Patterns of femorotibial cartilage loss in knees with neutral, varus, and valgus alignment. F Eckstein W Wirth M Hudelmaier V Stein V Lengfelder S Cahue,, et al. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2008 59 1563 1570
7. Can anatomic alignment measures from a knee radiograph substitute for mechanical alignment from full limb films? DT Felson TDV Cooke J Niu J Goggins J Choi J Yu,, et al. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2009 17 1448 1452 10.1016/j.joca.2009.05.012 19505430
8. A comparative assessment of alignment angle of the knee by radiographic and physical examination methods. VB Kraus TP Vail T Worrell G McDaniel, Arthritis & Rheumatism 2005 52 1730 1735
9. Varus foot alignment and hip conditions in older adults. KD Gross J Niu YQ Zhang DT Felson C McLennan MT Hannan,, et al. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2007 56 2993 2998
10. Foot rotation - a potential target to modify the knee adduction moment. AJ Teichtahl ME Morris AE Wluka R Baker R Wolfe SR Davis,, et al. Journal of Science & Medicine in Sport 2006 9 67 71
11. Prevalence of shoulder pain in the community: the influence of case definition. DP Pope PR Croft CM Pritchard AJ Silman, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1997 56 308 312 10.1136/ard.56.5.308 9175931
12. The grading of hallux valgus. The Manchester Scale. AP Garrow A Papageorgiou AJ Silman E Thomas MI Jayson GJ Macfarlane, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2001 91 74 78 11266481
13. Screening for hand osteoarthritis (OA) using a postal survey. S O'Reilly S Johnson S Doherty K Muir M Doherty, Osteoarthritis & Cartilage 1999 7 461 465
14. Relationship between Heberden's nodes and underlying radiographic changes of osteoarthritis. A Thaper W Zhang G Wright M Doherty, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2005 64 1214 1216 10.1136/ard.2004.031450 15677702
15. Attempt to replicate published genetic associations in a large, well-defined osteoarthritis case-control population (the GOAL study). KL Limer K Tosh SR Bujac R McConnell S Doherty F Nyberg,, et al. Osteoarthritis & Cartilage 2009 17 782 789
16. Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. DG Altman JM Bland, BMJ 1994 308 1552 8019315
17. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. [Review] [7 refs]. JJ Deeks DG Altman, BMJ 2004 329 168 169 10.1136/bmj.329.7458.168 15258077
18. Paleopathology: bone lesions in ancient peoples. E Berg, Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 1972 82 263 267
19. A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. A Whitehead J Whitehead, Statistics in Medicine 1991 10 1665 1677 10.1002/sim.4780101105 1792461
20. Posterior-anterior weight-bearing radiograph in 15 degree knee flexion in medial osteoarthritis. N Yamanaka T Takahashi N Ichikawa H Yamamoto, Skeletal Radiology 2003 32 28 34 12525941
21. Effective measurement of knee alignment using AP knee radiographs. AN Colebatch DJ Hart G Zhai FM Williams TD Spector NK Arden, Knee 2009 16 42 45 10.1016/j.knee.2008.07.007 18790641