Control of tripod-scheme cold-atom wavepackets by manipulating a non-Abelian vector potential

Annals of Physics

Volumn 325, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1219-1234

  Zhang, Qi ^a   Gong, Jiangbin ^b,c   Oh, C H ^a,d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Coherence lattice of cold atom wavepackets; Non Abelian Aharonov Bohm effect; Non Abelian geometric phase

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953621830     PISSN: 00034916     EISSN: 1096035X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2010.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Dum R., Olshanii M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 76:1788.
2. Juzeliunas G., Ohberg P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93:033602.
3. Juzeliunas G., et al. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 71:053614.
4. Ruseckas J., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95:010404.
5. Pietila V., Mottonen M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102:080403.
6. Larson J., Sjöqvist E. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 79:043627.
7. Juzeliunas G., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100:200405.
8. This is clear, because the actual mechanical momentum is shifted from - ih{stroke} ▽ by an effective vector potential derived in Ref. [7].
9. Vaishnav J.Y., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101:265302.
10. Juzeliunas G., et al. Phys. Rev. A 2008, 77:011802(R).
11. Vaishnav J.Y., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100:153002.
12. Merkl M., et al. Euro. Phys. Lett. 2008, 83:54002.
13. Zhang Q., Gong J.B., Oh C.H. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 81:023608.
14. Wilczek F., Zee A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984, 52:2111.
15. Zhang Q., Gong J.B., Oh C.H. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 79:043632.
16. Unanyan R.G., Shore B.W., Bergmann K. Phys. Rev. A 1999, 59:2910.
17. 0/m.
18. Sjöqvist E., Brown H.R., Carlsen H. Phys. Lett. A 1997, 229:273.
19. Kult D., Aberg J., Sjöqvist E. Phys. Rev. A 2006, 74:022106.
20. Jacob A., Öhberg P., Juzeliunas G., Santos L. Appl. Phys. B 2007, 89:439.
21. Zhang X.D., Wang Z.D., Hu L.B., Zhang Z.M., Zhu S.L. New J. Phys. 2008, 10:043031.
22. Here we choose the simplest adiabatic condition as our focus is not on a precise adiabatic condition. Note however, there are many alternative or more accurate expressions for the adiabatic condition. See for example: K.P. Marzlin, B.C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 160408; D.M. Tong, K. Singh, L.C. Kwek, C.H. Oh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 150402; D.M. Tong, K. Singh, L.C. Kwek, C.H. Oh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 110407.
23. Here we choose the simplest adiabatic condition as our focus is not on a precise adiabatic condition. Note however, there are many alternative or more accurate expressions for the adiabatic condition. See for example: K.P. Marzlin, B.C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 160408
24. D.M. Tong, K. Singh, L.C. Kwek, C.H. Oh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 150402
25. D.M. Tong, K. Singh, L.C. Kwek, C.H. Oh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 110407