Automatic Identification of Rhetorical Roles using Conditional Random Fields for Legal Document Summarization

IJCNLP 2008 - 3rd International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2008, Pages 481-488

  Saravanan, M ^a   Ravindran, B ^a   Raman, S ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHENTICATION; AUTOMATION; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION; DOCUMENT SUMMARIZATION; FEATURES SETS; LEGAL DOCUMENTS; LEGAL EXPERTS; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES; RANDOM FIELDS; ROLE IDENTIFICATION; SUBDOMAIN; TRAINING DATA;

RANDOM PROCESSES;

EID: 77953619104     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Atefeh Farzindar and Guy Lapalme. 2004. Legal text summarization by exploration of the thematic structures and argumentative roles, In Text sum marization Branches out workshop held in conjunc tion with ACL 2004, pages 27-34, Barcelona, Spain.
2. Atefeh Farzindar and Guy Lapalme. 2004. Letsum, an automatic legal text summarizing system, Legal Knowledge and Information System, Jurix 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference, Amsterdam, IOS Press, PP.11-18.
3. Ben Hachey and Claire Grover. 2005. Sequence Model ing for sentence classification in a legal summariza tion system, Proceedings of the 2005 ACM sympo sium on Applied Computing.
4. Bhatia, V.K., 1999. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings, London, Longman.
5. Cohen, W., and Singer, Y. 1999. A simple, fast, and effective rule learner, Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-99), AAAI Press, pp.335-342.
6. Dragomir Radev, Eduard Hovy, Kathleen McKeown.2002 Introduction to the special issue on summari zation, Computational Linguistics 28(4)4, Associa tion for Computing Machinery.
7. Dragomir Radev, Jahna Otterbaher, Hong Qi, and Daniel Tam. 2003. Mead Reducs: Michigan at DUC, In DUC03, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, May 31- June 1. Association for Computational Linguis tics.
8. Dou Shen, Jian-Tao Sun, Hua Li, Qiang Yang, and Zheng Chen. 2007. Document Summarization using Conditional Random Fields. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2007, Hyderabad, India, PP.2862-2867.
9. Friedmen, J.H., & and Popescu, B. E. 2005. Predictive learning via rule ensembles (Technical Report), Stanford University.
10. Fuchun Peng and Andrew McCullam, 2006. Accurate information extraction from research papers using conditional random fields, Information Processing Management, 42(4): 963-979.
11. John Lafferty, Andrew McCullam and Fernando Pereira, 2001. Conditional Random Fields: Probabil istic models and for segmenting and labeling sequence data, Proceedings of international conference on Machine learning.
12. Karen Sparck Jones and Julia Galliers. 1996. Evaluating Natural Language Processing Systems: An Analysis and Review. Natural Language Engineering, 4(2):175-190, Springer-Verlag.
13. Lin, Chin-Yew. 2004. ROUGE: a Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries, Proceedings of Workshop on Text Summarization, pp: 21-26, Bar celona, Spain.
14. Marie-Francine Moens, 2004. An Evaluation Forum for Legal Information Retrieval Systems? Proceedings of the ICAIL-2003 Workshop on Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems (pp. 18 24). International Organization for Artificial In telligence and Law.
15. Saravanan, M., Ravindran, B. and Raman, S. 2006. A Probabilistic Approach to Multi-document summari zation for generating a Tiled Sumamry, International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applica tions, 6(2): 231-243, Imperial College Press.
16. Saravanan, M., Ravindran, B. and Raman, S. 2006. Improving legal document Summarization using graphical models, Legal Knowledge and Information System, JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Con ference, Paris, IOS Press, PP.51-60.
17. Siegal, Sidney and N.John Jr. Castellan. 1988. Non- parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, McGraw Hill, Berkeley, CA.
18. Simone Teufel and Marc Moens, 2002. Summarizing scientific articles - experiments with relevance and rhetorical status, Association of Computational Linguistics, 28(4): 409-445.
19. Yen-Yuan Yeh, Hao-Ren Ke, Wei-Pang Yang, and I-Heng Meng, 2005. Text summarization using a trainable summarizer and latent semantic analysis, Information processing management, 41(1):75-95.