A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for distribution feeder reconfiguration

Science China Technological Sciences

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 950-959

  Niknam, Taher ^a   Azad Farsani, Ehsan ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO); Discrete particle swarm optimization (DPSO); Distribution feeder reconfiguration (DFR); Evolutionary algorithms (EA); Self adaptive particle swarm optimization (SAPSO); Shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA)

Indexed keywords

FEEDING; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION;

ADAPTIVE PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATIONS; BINARY PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; DISCRETE PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; DISTRIBUTION FEEDER RECONFIGURATION (DFR); SHUFFLED FROG LEAPING ALGORITHM (SFLA);

PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO);

EID: 77953614410     PISSN: 16747321     EISSN: 18691900     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-010-0116-2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Kim H, Ko Y, Jung K H. Artificial neural-network based feeder reconfiguration for loss reduction in distribution systems. IEEE Tran. Power Del, 1993, 8: 1356-1366
2. Taylor T, Lubkeman D. Implementation of heuristic search strategies for distribution feeder reconfiguration. IEEE Trans Power Del, 1990, 5: 239-245
3. Kashem M A, Ganapathy V, Jasmon G B. Network reconfiguration for load balancing in distribution networks. In: Proc Inst Elect Eng-Gener, Transm, Distrib, 1999, 146: 563-567
4. Jeon Y J, Kim J C. Network reconfiguration in radial distribution system using simulated annealing and tabu search. In: Proc IEEE Power Eng Soc Winter Meeting, 2000, 4: 2329-2333
5. Lin W M, Cheng F S, Tsay M T. Distribution feeder reconfiguration with refined genetic algorithm. In: Proc Inst Elect Eng-Gener, Transm, Distrib, 2000, 147: 349-354
6. Morton A B, Mareels I M Y. An efficient brute-force solution to the network reconfiguration problem. IEEE Trans Power Del, 2000, 15:996-1000
7. Goswami S K, Basu S K. A new algorithm for the reconfiguration of distribution feeders for loss minimization. IEEE Trans Power Del, 1992, 7: 1484-1491
8. Lopez E, Opaso H. Online reconfiguration considering variability demand: Applications to real networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2004, 19: 549-553
9. Debaprya D. A fuzzy multi-objective approach for network reconfiguration of distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Del, 2006, 21:202-209
10. Niknam T. A New hybrid algorithm for multiobjective distribution feeder reconfiguration. Cybernetics and Systems: An Intl J, 2009, 40:1-20
11. Niknam T. An efficient hybrid evolutionary based on PSO and ACO algorithms for distribution feeder reconfiguration, accepted for future publication in European Transaction on Electrical Power, doi: 10.1002/etep.339, 2009
12. Niknam T. An efficient hybrid evolutionary algorithm based on PSO and HBMO algorithms for multi-objective Distribution Feeder Reconfiguration. Energy Conv Manag, 2009, 50: 2074-2082
13. Liu L, Chen X. Reconfiguration of distribution networks based on fuzzy genetic algorithms (in Chinese). Proc CSEE, 2000, 20: 66-69
14. Bi P, Liu J, Liu C. A Refined genetic algorithm for power distribution network reconfiguration (in Chinese). Autom Elec Power Syst, 2002, 26: 57-61
15. Shirmohammadi D, Hong H W. Reconfiguration of electric distribution networks for resistive line loss reduction. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 1998, 4: 1492-1498
16. Li Z K, Chen X Y, Yu K, et al. A hybrid particle swarm optimization approach for distribution network reconfiguration problem. IEEE Power Energy Soc General Meeting, 2007. 1-7
17. Yu J M, Zhang F, Ni F, et al. Improved genetic algorithm with infea- sible solution disposing of distribution network reconfiguration. IEEE Intel Syst, 2009, 2: 48-52
18. Liu B S, Xie K G, Zhou Ji Q. Electrical distribution networks reconfiguration using dynamic programming. Proc CSEE, 2005, 25: 29-34
19. Ge S Y, Liu Z F, Yu Y X. An improved Tabu search for reconfiguration of distribution systems. Power Syst Technol, 2004, 29: 22-26
20. Ma X F, Zhang L Z, Kong L Y. Reconfiguration of distribution networks based on family eugenics based evolution algorithms. Proc CSEE, 2004, 24: 97-102
21. Meng W C, Qiu J J. An artificial immune algorithm to distribution network reconfiguration. Proc CSEE, 2006, 26: 25-29
22. Su C T, Lee C S. Network reconfiguration of distribution systems using improved mixed-integer hybrid differential evolution. IEEE Trans Power Del, 2003, 18: 1022-1027
23. Chiou J P, Chang C F, Su C T. Variable scaling hybrid differential evolution for solving network reconfiguration of distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2005, 20: 668-674
24. Cheng H, Kou C C. Netwok reconfiguration in distribution system using simulated annealing. Elec Power Syst Res, 1994, 29: 227-238
25. Viswanadha Raju G K, Bijwe P R. An efficient algorithm for minimum loss reconfiguration of Distribution system based on sensitivity and heuristics. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2008, 23: 1280-1287
26. Ahuja A, Das S, Pahwa A. An AIS-ACO hybrid approach for multi- objective distribution system reconfiguration. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2007, 22: 1101-1111
27. Elbeltagi E, Hegazy T, Grierson D. Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms. Adv Eng Inform, 2005, 19: 43-53
28. Carlisle A, Dozier G. An off-the-shelf PSO. In: Proc IEEE International Workshop Particle Swarm Optimization, USA, 2001. 1-6
29. Sakthivel V P, Bhuvaneswari R, Subramanian S. Multi-objective parameter estimation of induction motor using particle swarm optimization. Eng Appl Artif Intel, doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2009.06.004, 2009
30. Taylan Das M, Canan Dulger L. Signature verification (SV) toolbox: Application of PSO-NN. Engg Appl Artif Intel, 2009, 22: 688-694
31. He Q, Wang L. An effective co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems. Eng Appl Artif Intel, 2007, 20: 88-89
32. Eusuff M, Lansey K. Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. J Water Resour Plan Manag, 2003, 129: 10-25
33. Zhang X C, Hu X M, Cui G Z, et al. An improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm with cognitive behavior. IEEE Intel Contl Autom, 2008, 16: 6197-6202