Structural and functional MRI in children with renal disease: First experience;Strukturelle und funktionelle MRT bei Kindern mit Nierenkrankheiten

Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 115-121

  Jrgensen, Bettina ^a   Karstoft, Kristian ^a   Jrgensen, Troels Munch ^a   Rittig, Sren ^a   Frkir, Jrgen ^a   Pedersen, Michael ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Children; Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; Funktionelle MRT; Kidney disease; Kinder; Nierenfunktion; Nierenkrankheiten; Renal function

Indexed keywords

EDETATE CHROMIUM CR 51; GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; RADIOISOTOPE; EDETIC ACID;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HEMOLYTIC UREMIC SYNDROME; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; KIDNEY CALYX; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY DISEASE; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY MEDULLA; MALE; MENINGOMYELOCELE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REFERENCE VALUE; SCHOOL CHILD; URINARY TRACT DISEASE; ALGORITHM; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC USE; KIDNEY; KIDNEY FUNCTION TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHMS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EDETIC ACID; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY DISEASES; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE;

EID: 77953612293     PISSN: 09393889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2010.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Mendichovszky I., Pedersen M., Frkiaer J., Dissing T., Grenier N., Anderson P., et al. How accurate is dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the assessment of renal glomerular filtration rate? A critical appraisal. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008 Apr, 27(4):925-931.
2. Jrgensen B., Keller A.K., Radvanska E., Rittig S., Taagehoj-Jensen F., Frkiaer J., et al. Reproducibility of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance renography in adolescents. J Urol 2006 Sep, 176(3):1171-1176.
3. Karstoft K., Lodrup A.B., Dissing T.H., Sorensen T.S., Nyengaard J.R., Pedersen M. Different strategies for MRI measurements of renal cortical volume. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007 Dec, 26(6):1564-1571.
4. New recommendations on the use of MRI contrast agents in patients with impaired renal function. Danish Medicines Agency 2007 February. Available from: URL: http://www.dkma.dk/1024/visUKLSArtikel.asp?artikelID=10409.
5. Ldrup A.B., Karstoft K., Dissing T.H., Nyengaard J.R., Pedersen M. The association between renal function and structural parameters: a pig study. BMC Nephrol 2008 Dec 23, 9:18.
6. Poggio E.D., Hila S., Stephany B., Fatica R., Krishnamurthi V., del Bosque C., et al. Donor kidney volume and outcomes following live donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2006, 6:616-624.
7. Cheung C.M., Shurrab A.E., Buckley D.L., Hegarty J., Middleton R.J., Mamtora H., et al. MR derived renal morphology and renal function in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Kidney Int 2006, 69:715-722.
8. Mounier-Vehier C., Lions C., Jaboureck O., Devos P., Haulon S., Wibaux M., et al. Parenchymal consequences of fibromuscular dysplasia renal artery stenosis. Am J Kidney Dis 2002, 40:1138-1145.
9. Hackstein N., Puille M.F., Bak B.H., Scharwat O., Rau W.S. Measurement of single kidney contrast media clearance by multiphasic spiral computed tomography: preliminary results. Eur J Radiol 2001 Sep, 39(3):201-208.
10. Tsushima Y., Blomley M.J., Okabe K., Tsuchiya K., Aoki J., Endo K. Determination of glomerular filtration rate per unit renal volume using computerized tomography: correlation with conventional measures of total and divided renal function. J Urol 2001 Feb, 165(2):382-385.
11. Hackstein N., Kooijman H., Tomaselli S., Rau W.S. Glomerular filtration rate measured using the Patlak plot technique and contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI with different amounts of gadolinium-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005 Sep, 22(3):406-414.
12. Buckley D.L., Shurrab A.E., Cheung C.M., Jones A.P., Mamtora H., Kalra P.A. Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison of two models in human subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006 Nov, 24(5):1117-1123.
13. Annet L., Hermoye L., Peeters F., Jamar F., Dehoux J.P., Van Beers B.E. Glomerular filtration rate: assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and a cortical-compartment model in the rabbit kidney. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004 Nov, 20(5):843-849.
14. Hackstein N., Heckrodt J., Rau W.S. Measurement of single-kidney glomerular filtration rate using a contrast-enhanced dynamic gradient-echo sequence and the Rutland-Patlak plot technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003 Dec, 18(6):714-725.
15. Attenberger U.I., Sourbron S.P., Notohamiprodjo M., Lodemann K.P., Glaser C.G., Reiser M.F., et al. MR-based semi-automated quantification of renal functional parameters with a two-compartment model an interobserver analysis. Eur J Radiol 2008 Jan, 65(1):59-65.
16. Cutajar M, Mendichovszky IA, Tofts PS, Gordon I. The importance of AIF ROI selection in DCE-MRI renography: Reproducibility and variability of renal perfusion and filtration. Eur J Radiol 2009 Jun 19.
17. Prasad P.V. Functional MRI of the kidney: tools for translational studies of pathophysiology of renal disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2006 May, 290(5):F958-F974.
18. bu-Alfa A. The impact of NSF on the care of patients with kidney disease. J Am Coll Radiol 2008 Jan, 5(1):45-52.
19. Macios A. Adjusting the Contrast for MRI. Radiology Today 2008, 9(6):20.