Diagnostic ability of a linear discriminant function for optic nerve head parameters measured with optical coherence tomography for perimetric glaucoma

Eye

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1051-1057

  Pablo, L E ^a,b   Ferreras, A ^a,b   Pajarin A B ^c   Fogagnolo, P ^d  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MIGUEL SERVET   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^c Family Medicine   (Spain)

^d IRCCS FONDAZIONE BIETTI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Logistic regression; OCT; Optic nerve head; Optical coherence tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPTIC NERVE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PERIMETRY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

EID: 77953604166     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2009.245     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Academy of Ophthalmology Glaucoma Panel. Preferred Practice Pattern. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. American Academy of Ophthalmology: San Francisco, CA, 2005, p 3.
2. Quigley HA, Miller NR, George T. Clinical evaluation of nerve fiber layer atrophy as an indicator of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 1564-1571.
3. Quigley HA. Neuronal death in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 1999; 18: 39-57.
4. Stratus OCT. Model 3000 User Manual. Carl Zeiss Meditec: Dublin, CA, 2003.
5. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991; 254: 1178-1181.
6. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003; 49: 7-18.
7. Bleeker SE, Moll HA, Steyerberg EW, Donders AR, Derksen-Lubsen G, Grobbee DE et al. External validation is necessary in prediction research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 826-832.
8. Chylack Jr LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, et al., Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 831-836.
9. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 108: 130-135.
10. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839-843.
11. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 827-837.
12. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Tannenbaum DP, Law SK, Caprioli J. Identifying early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 228-235.
13. Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC, Williams J, Blumenthal EZ, Sánchez-Galeana CA et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg retina tomograph, GDx nerve fiber analyzer, and optical coherence tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 985-993.
14. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, McSoley J, Katz J. Sensitivity and specificity of the Stratus OCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 3-9.
15. Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim TW, Khwarg SI, Kim DM. Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 2157-2163.
16. Sihota R, Sony P, Gupta V, Dada T, Singh R. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the degree of glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 2006-2010.
17. Huang ML, Chen HY. Development and comparison of automated classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Stratus optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 4121-4129.
18. Chen HY, Huang ML, Hung PT. Logistic regression analysis for glaucoma diagnosis using Stratus optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 527-534.
19. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Vessani RM, Susanna Jr R, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 44-55.
20. Ferreras A, Pablo LE, Pajarín AB, Larrosa JM, Polo V, Honrubia FM. Logistic regression analysis for early glaucoma diagnosis using optical coherence tomography. Archives Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 465-470.
21. Bowd C, Hao J, Tavares IM, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Lee TW et al. Bayesian machine learning classifiers for combining structural and functional measurements to classify healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 945-953.
22. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1008-1015.
23. Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Sources of bias in studies of optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer morphology. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 986.
24. Medeiros FA. How should diagnostic tests be evaluated in glaucoma? Br J Ophthalmol 2007; 91: 273-274.