Attitude-based negotiation methodology for the management of construction disputes

Journal of Management in Engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 114-122

  Yousefi, Saied ^a   Hipel, Keith W ^a   Hegazy, Tarek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Negotiation methodology; Strategic; Tactical

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL TOOL; CONSTRUCTION DISPUTE; DECISION MAKERS; GRAPH MODEL FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION; OPTIMUM SOLUTION; STRATEGIC DECISIONS; STRATEGIC LEVEL; UTILITY FUNCTIONS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 77953585910     PISSN: 0742597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000013     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bellucci, E., and Zeleznikow, J. (1998). " Family-negotiator: An intelligent decision support system for negotiation in Australian Family Law.." Proc., 4th Conf.: Int. Society of Decision Support Systems, Ecole des HEC, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 359-374.
2. Breckler, S. J., and Wiggins, E. C. (1992). " On defining attitude and attitude theory: Once more with feeling.." Attitude structure and function, A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, and, A. G. Greenwald, eds., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 407-427.
3. Cheung, S., Suen, H. C. H., and Lam, T. I. (2002). " Fundamentals of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction.." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. JCEMD4 0733-9364, 128 (5), 409-417. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002) 128:5(409) (Pubitemid 40265525)
4. Cheung, S., Yiu, K. T. W., and Suen, H. (2004). " Construction negotiation online.." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. JCEMD4 0733-9364, 130 (6), 844-852. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:6(844) (Pubitemid 40265317)
5. Darling, T., and Mumpower, J. L. (1990). " Modeling cognitive influences on the dynamics of negotiations.." Proc., 23rd Annual Int. Conf. on Sys. Sci., IEEE, Piscataway, N.J., 22-30.
6. De Sousa, C. A. (2000). " The Brownfield problem in urban Canada: Issues, approaches, and solutions.." Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate Dept. of Geography, The Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
7. Doug, J. (2006). " Construction project dispute resolution: Options for effective dispute avoidance and management.." J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. JPEPE3 1052-3928, 132 (3), 225-236. 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006) 132:3(225) (Pubitemid 43932202)
8. Du, T. C., and Chen, H. L. (2007). " Building a multiple-criteria negotiation support system.." IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. ITKEEH 1041-4347, 19 (6), 804-817. 10.1109/TKDE.2007.190618 (Pubitemid 46685657)
9. Eliashberg, J., and Winkler, R. L. (1978). " The role of attitude toward risk in strictly competitive decision-making situations.." Manage. Sci. MSCIAM 0025-1909, 24 (12), 1231-1241. 10.1287/mnsc.24.12.1231
10. Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., and Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Interactive decision making: The graph model for conflict resolution, Wiley, New York.
11. Fraser, N. M., and Hipel, K. W. (1984). Conflict analysis: Models and resolutions, North-Holland, New York.
12. Fulbright, R. C., and Jaworski, L. L. P. (2006). " The Third Annual Report of the LTSF. Rep. No. 3, Litigation Trends Survey Findings (LTSF), www.fulbright.com (June 5, 2007), 11-12.
13. Hanoch, G., and Levy, H. (1970). " Efficient portfolio selection with quadratic and cubic utility.." J. Bus., 43, 181-189. 10.1086/295264 0021-9398
14. Harmon, K. M. J. (2003). " Resolution of construction disputes: A review of current methodologies.." Leadership Manage. Eng. LMEEAZ 1532-6748, 3 (4), 187-201. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187)
15. Hipel, K. W., Jamshidi, M. M., Tien, J. M., and White, C. C. (2007). " The Future of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Application Domains and Research Methods.." IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Part C Appl. Rev. ITCRFH 1094-6977, 37 (5), 726-743. 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.900671 (Pubitemid 47323546)
16. Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of rationality: Theory of metagames and political behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
17. Inohara, T., Hipel, K. W., and Walker, S. (2007). " Conflict analysis approaches for investigating attitudes and misperceptions in the war of 1812.." J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng., 16 (2), 181-201. 10.1007/s11518-007- 5042-x 1004-3756 (Pubitemid 46993928)
18. Kassab, M., Hipel, K. W., and Hegazy, T. (2006). " Conflict resolution in construction disputes using the graph model.." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. JCEMD4 0733-9364, 132 (10), 1043-1052. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9364(2006)132:10(1043) (Pubitemid 44410230)
19. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.
20. Kilgour, D. M. (2006). Introduction to game theory: MA 235 course package, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, Ont.
21. Kilgour, D. M. (2007). Part IV: Diplomacy games-The graph model for conflict resolution as a tool for negotiators, Springer, Berlin, 251-263.
22. Kirkwood, C. W. (1997). Notes on attitude towards risk taking and exponential utility function, Dept. of Management, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, Ariz.
23. Mumpower, J. L. (1991). " The judgment policies of negotiators and the structure of negotiation problems.." Manage. Sci. MSCIAM 0025-1909, 37 (10), 1304-1324. 10.1287/mnsc.37.10.1304
24. Omoto, T., Kobayashi, K., and Onishi, M. (2002). " Bargaining model of construction dispute resolution.." IEEE-Systems man and cybernetic, Vol. 7, IEEE, Piscataway, N.J., 6-17.
25. Pea-Mora, F., and Wang, C. Y. (1998). " Computer-supported collaborative negotiation methodology.." J. Comput. Civ. Eng. JCCEE5 0887-3801, 12 (2), 64-81. 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1998)12:2(64)
26. Pinnell, S. (1999). " Partnering and the management of construction disputes.." Dispute Resolut. J. ZZZZZZ 1074-8105, 54 (1), 16-22.
27. Rameezdeen, R., and Gunarathna, N. (2003). " Disputes and construction industry cultures.." AACE International Transactions (CD-ROM), ABI/INFORM Global, Ann Arbor, Mich., 241-248.
28. Scott, B., and Billing, B. (1990). Negotiating skills in engineering and construction, Thomas Telford, London, 71-83. 10.1680/nsienc.15173
29. Trantina, T. L. (2001). " An attorney's guide to alternative dispute resolution: ADR 1.01.." New Jersey Bar Association: Justice Marie L. Garibaldi, American Inn of Court for Alternative Dispute Resolution, Bedminster, N.J.
30. Zeleznikow, J., Bellucci, E., Schild, U. J., and MacKenzie, G. (2007). " Bargaining in the shadow of the law-Using utility functions to support legal negotiation.." Proc. Int. Conf. on 11th Artificial Intelligence and Law, Stanford Law School, Stanford, Calif., 237-246.
31. Zuhair, S. M. M., Taylor, D. B., and Kramer, R. A. (1992). " Choice of utility function form: Its effect on classification of risk preferences and the prediction of farmer decisions.." Agric. Econ., 6, 333-344. 10.1016/0169-5150(92)90009-N 0169-5150