Argument-driven inquiry to promote the understanding of important concepts & practices in biology

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 71, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 465-472

  Sampson, Victor ^a   Gleim, Leeanne ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953582931     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1662/005.071.0805     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J., Gardner, A., Scotter, P., Powell, I J., Westbrook, A. et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Application. Colorado Springs, CO: National Institutes of Health, Office of Science Education.
2. Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-313.
3. Duschl, R. A. & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
4. Indrisano, R. & Paratore, J. (Eds.). (2005). Learning To Write and Writing To Learn: Theory and Research in Practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
5. Kuhn, L. & Reiser, B. (2005). Students constructIing and defending evidence-based scientific explanations. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX.
6. Linn, M. C. & Eylon, B.-S. (2006). Science Education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. (In P. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 511-544). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. National Research Council. (2005). America's Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
9. National Research Council. (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
10. Sampson, V. & Clark, D. (2008). Differences in the ways more and less successful groups engage in argumentation: A case study. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST). Baltimore, MD.
11. Sampson, V. & Grooms, J. (2008). Science as Argument-Driven Inquiry: The impact on students' conceptions of the nature of scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST).
12. Saul, E. W. (Ed.). (2004). Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives on Theory and Practice. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
13. Shanahan, C. (2004). Better textbooks, better readers and writers. In W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives on Theory and Practice. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
14. Wallace, C., Hand, B. & Prain, V. (Eds.). (2004). Writing and Learning in the Science Classroom. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Wallace, C., Hand, B. & Yang, E.-M. (2005). The science writing heuristic: Using writing as a tool for learning in the laboratory. In W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.