An approximate-state Riemann solver for the two-dimensional shallow water equations with porosity

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 62, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1299-1331

  Finaud Guyot, P ^a,b   Delenne, C ^b   Lhomme, J ^b,c   Guinot, V ^b   Llovel, C ^a  

^a GEI Ginger Environnement et Infrastructures société du groupe GINGER   (France)

^b UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^c HR WALLINGFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Approximate state riemann solver; Godunov type schemes; PorAS solver; Porosity; Source terms; Two dimensional shallow water

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL CELL; FLOOD-PLAINS; FLUX VECTORS; GODUNOV-TYPE SCHEMES; HYPERBOLIC SYSTEMS OF CONSERVATION LAWS; MOMENTUM EQUATION; RAREFACTION WAVES; RIEMANN INVARIANTS; RIEMANN SOLVER; SHALLOW WATER EQUATIONS; SHALLOW WATERS; SOURCE TERMS; TWO-DIMENSIONAL SHALLOW WATER EQUATIONS;

TWO DIMENSIONAL;

POROSITY;

EID: 77953574881     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2066     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alcrudo F, Benkhaldoun F. Exact solutions to the Riemann problem of the shallow water equations with a bottom step. Computers and Fluids 2001; 30:643-671.
2. Rochette D, Clain S. Two-dimensional computation of gas flow in a porous bed characterized by a porosity jump. Journal of Computational Physics 2006; 219:104-119.
3. Defina A, D'Alpaos L, Mattichio B. A new set of equations for very shallow water and partially dry areas suitable to 2D numerical domains. Proceedings Specialty Conference `Modelling of Flood Propagation over Initially Dry Areas', Milano, Italy, 29 June-1 July 1994.
4. Hervouet JM, Samie H, Moreau B. Modelling urban areas in dam-break flood-wave numerical simulations. Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop on Rescue Actions Based on Dambreak Flow Analysis, Seinâjoki, Finland, 1-6 October 2000.
5. Guinot V, Soares-Frazão S. Flux and source term discretization in two-dimensional shallow water models with porosity on unstructured grids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2006; 50:309-345.
6. Lhomme J, Guinot V. A general approximate-state Riemann solver for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws with source terms. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 53:1509-1540.
7. Godunov SK. A difference method for numerical calculation of discontinuous equations of hydrodynamic equations. Matematicheskii Sbornik 1959; 47:271-300 (in Russian).
8. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference scheme. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 43:357-372.
9. Roe PL, Pike J. Efficient construction and utilisation of approximate Riemann solutions. Computing Methods in Applied Science and Engineering. North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1984.
10. Harten A, Hyman P. Self-adjusting grid methods for one-dimensional hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 1983; 50:235.
11. Roe PL. Sonic flux formulae. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 1992; 13(2):611-630.
12. Toro EF. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer: Berlin, 1997.
13. Toro EF. A linearised Riemann solver for the time-dependent Euler equations of the gas dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 1991; 434:683-693.
14. Toro EF, Chou CC. A linearised Riemann solver for the steady supersonic Euler equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1993; 16:173-186.
15. Quirk JJ. An alternative to unstructured grids for computing gas dynamic flows around arbitrarily complex two dimensional bodies. Computers and Fluids 1994; 23(1):125-142.
16. Harten A, Lax P-D, Van-Leer B. On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Review 1983; 25:35-61.
17. Guinot V. Wave Propagation in Fluids: Models and Numerical Techniques. ISTE Ltd., John Wiley & Sons Inc.: London, Hoboken, 2008.
18. Toro EF, Spruce M, Speares W. Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver. Shock Waves 1994; 4:25-34.
19. Osher S, Solomon F. Upwind difference schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Mathematics of Computation 1982; 38:339-374.
20. Linde T. A practical, general-purpose, two-state HLL Riemann solver for hyperbolic conservation laws. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2002; 40:391-402.
21. Lax P-D. Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 1957; 10:537-566.
22. Colella P. Glimm's method for gas dynamics. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 1982; 3:76-110.
23. Dukowicz JK. A general, non iterative Riemann solver for Godunov's method. Journal of Computational Physics 1985; 61:119-137.
24. Guinot V. Riemann solvers for water hammer simulations by Godunov method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 49:851-870.
25. Guinot V. Numerical simulation of two-phase flow in pipes using Godunov method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2001; 50:1169-1189.
26. Ivings MJ, Causon DM, Toro EF. On Riemann solvers for compressible fluids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1998; 28:395-418.
27. Toro EF. Direct Riemann solvers for the time-dependent Euler equation. Shock Waves 1995; 5:75-80.
28. LeVeque RJ. Balancing source terms and flux gradients in high-resolution Godunov methods: the quasi-steady wave-propagation algorithm. Journal of Computational Physics 1998; 146:346-365.
29. Bermudez A, Vazquez ME. Upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with source terms. Computers and Fluids 1994; 8:1049-1071.
30. Greenberg JM, Le Roux AY. A well balanced scheme for the numerical processing of the source terms in hyperbolic equation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1996; 33:1-16.
31. Gallouët T, Hérard JM, Seguin N. Some approximate Godunov schemes to compute shallow-water equations with topography. Computers and Fluids 2003; 32:479-513.
32. Lhomme J. One-dimensional, two-dimensional and macroscopic approaches to urban flood modelling. Ph.D. Thesis, Montpellier 2 university, 2006 (in French).
33. Sanders BF, Schubert JE, Gallegos HA. Integral formulation of shallow-water equations with anisotropic porosity for urban flood modelling. Journal of Hydrology 2008; 362:19-38.
34. Soares-Frazo S, Lhomme J, Guinot V, Zech Y. Two-dimensional shallow water model with porosity for urban flood modelling. Journal of Hydraulic Research 2008; 46(1):45-64.
35. Garcia-Navarro P, Vazquez-Cendon ME. On numerical treatment of the source terms in the shallow water equations. Computers and Fluids 2000; 29:951-979.
36. Nujíc M. Efficient implementation of non-oscillatory schemes for the computation of free-surface flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research 1995; 33:101-111.
37. Jeffrey A, Tanuiti T. Nonlinear Wave Propagation. Academic press: New York, 1964.