Differences in presentation and perioperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer and benign pancreatitis

American Surgeon

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 606-613

  Chu, Carrie K ^a   Sarmiento, Juan M ^a   Park, Jaemin ^a   Staley, Charles A ^a   Galloway, John R ^a   Adsay, N Volkan ^b   Kooby, David A ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CA 19-9 ANTIGEN; GLUCOSE; SERUM ALBUMIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BILIARY TRACT DRAINAGE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMORBIDITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA; INFECTION RATE; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; JAUNDICE; LAPAROTOMY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; NAUSEA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; STOMACH EMPTYING; STOMACH PARESIS; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

AGED; BILE DUCTS, EXTRAHEPATIC; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CARCINOMA, PANCREATIC DUCTAL; DILATATION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMALE; GASTRIC EMPTYING; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DUCTS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATITIS, CHRONIC; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77953572923     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 1997;226:248-57; discussion57-60.
2. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 2006;244:10-5.
3. Simons JP, Shah SA, Ng SC, et al. National complication rates after pancreatectomy: beyond mere mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:1798-805.
4. DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2006;244:931-7; discussion 37-9.
5. Talamini G, Falconi M, Bassi C, et al. Incidence of cancer in the course of chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:1253-60.
6. Andersen DK, Frey CF. The evolution of the surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2010;251:18-32.
7. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83. (Pubitemid 17055592)
8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13. (Pubitemid 38963009)
9. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8-13. (Pubitemid 40933766)
10. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007;142:761-8.
11. Sarli L, Pavlidis C, Cinieri FG, et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic left hemicolectomy for colon cancer with laparoscopic left hemicolectomy for benign colorectal disease. World J Surg 2006;30:446-52.
12. Cescon M, Vetrone G, Grazi GL, et al. Trends in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1500 consecutive unselected cases over 20 years. Ann Surg 2009;249:995-1002.
13. Schafer M, Mullhaupt B, Clavien PA. Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2002;236:137-48. (Pubitemid 34809532)
14. Hill JS, McPhee JT, Whalen GF, et al. In-hospital mortality after pancreatic resection for chronic pancreatitis: populationbased estimates from the nationwide inpatient sample. J Am Coll Surg 2009;209:468-76.
15. Cortes A, Sauvanet A, Bert F, et al. Effect of bile contamination on immediate outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumor. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:93-9.
16. Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR, et al. Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomyassociated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2001;234:47-55.
17. Plate JM, Harris JE. Immune cell functions in pancreatic cancer. Crit Rev Immunol 2000;20:375-92.
18. Morse MA, Hall JR, Plate JM. Countering tumor-induced immunosuppression during immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2009;9:331-9.
19. Bernard AC, Davenport DL, Chang PK, et al. Intraoperative transfusion of 1 U to 2 U packed red blood cells is associated with increased 30-day mortality, surgical-site infection, pneumonia, and sepsis in general surgery patients. JAm Coll Surg 2009;208:931-7, 37.e1-2; discussion 38-9.
20. Procter LD, Davenport DL, Bernard AC, Zwischenberger JB. General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:60-5.e1-2.
21. Haridas M, Malangoni MA. Predictive factors for surgical site infection in general surgery. Surgery 2008;144:496-501; discussion501-3.
22. McKay CJ, Glen P, McMillan DC. Chronic inflammation and pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008;22:65-73.
23. Maluf-Filho F, Dotti CM, Halwan B, et al. An evidencebased consensus statement on the role and application of endosonography in clinical practice. Endoscopy 2009;41:979-87.