Implementation of semi-discrete, non-staggered central schemes in a colocated, polyhedral, finite volume framework, for high-speed viscous flows

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-21

  Greenshields, Christopher J ^a,b   Weller, Henry G ^b   Gasparini, Luca ^c   Reese, Jason M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b OpenCFD Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^c Fondmetal Technologies Srl   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biconic; Central schemes; Compressible viscous flows; Finite volume; Forward facing step; Hypersonic flows; Navier stokes equations; Polyhedral; Semi discrete; Supersonic jet

Indexed keywords

BICONIC; CENTRAL SCHEME; COMPRESSIBLE VISCOUS FLOWS; FINITE VOLUME; SUPERSONIC JETS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; FACINGS; HYPERSONIC AERODYNAMICS; HYPERSONIC FLOW; INTERPOLATION; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; SUPERSONIC AERODYNAMICS; VISCOSITY; VISCOUS FLOW;

NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS;

EID: 77953571906     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2069     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ferziger JH, Peric M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1996.
2. Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995.
3. Peric M, Ferguson S. The advantage of polyhedral meshes, 2005. Available from: http://www.cd-adapco.com/pressroom/-dynamics/24/testVspoly.html.
4. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme, V: A second-order sequel to Godunov's method. Journal of Computational Physics 1979; 32:101-136.
5. Colella P, Woodward P. The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 1984; 54:174-201.
6. Harten A, Engquist B, Osher S, Chakravarthy SR. Uniformly high order accuracy essentially non-oscillatory schemes III. Journal of Computational Physics 1987; 71:231-303.
7. Liu XD, Osher S, Chan T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 115:200-212.
8. Cockburn B, Shu CW. The Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for conservation laws, V: multidimensional systems. Journal of Computational Physics 1998; 141:199-224.
9. Nessyahu H, Tadmor E. Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 1990; 87:408-447.
10. Arminjon P, Viallon MC. Convergence of a finite volume extension of the Nessyahu-Tadmor scheme on unstructured grids for a two-dimensional linear hyperbolic equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1999; 36:738-771.
11. Christov I, Popov B. New non-oscillatory central schemes on unstructured triangulations for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227:5736-5757.
12. Haasdonk B, Kroner B, Rohde D. Convergence of a staggered Lax-Friedrichs scheme for nonlinear conservation laws on unstructured two-dimensional grids. Numerische Mathematik 2001; 88:459-484.
13. Huynh H. Analysis and improvement of upwind and centered schemes on quadrilateral and triangular meshes. AIAA Paper 2003-3541, 16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, FL, 2003.
14. Katsaounis T, Levy D. A modified structured central scheme for 2D hyperbolic conservation laws. Applied Mathematics Letters 1999; 12:89-96.
15. Kurganov A, Petrova G. Central-upwind schemes on triangular grids for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 2005; 21:536-552.
16. Kuther M. Error estimates for the staggered Lax-Friedrichs scheme on unstructured grids. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 2001; 39:1269-1301.
17. Arminjon P, Madrane A. St-Cyr A. Non-oscillatory Lax-Friedrichs type central finite volume methods for 3-D flows on unstructured tetrahedral grids. In Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications: Eighth International Conference in Magdeburg, February/March 2000, Freistühler H, Warnecke G (eds), vol. 140. Birkhäuser: Basel, 2001; 59-68.
18. Arminjon P, St-Cyr A. Nessyahu-Tadmor-type central finite volume methods without predictor for 3D Cartesian and unstructured tetrahedral grids. Applied Numerical Mathematics 2003; 46:135-155.
19. Jiang GS, Tadmor E. Non-oscillatory central schemes for multidimensional hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1998; 19:1892-1917.
20. Kurganov A, Lin CT. On the reduction of numerical dissipation in central-upwind schemes. Communications in Computational Physics 2007; 2:141-163.
21. Kurganov A, Petrova G. A third-order semi-discrete genuinely multidimensional central scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws and related problems. Numerische Mathematik 2001; 88:683-729.
22. Levy D, Puppo G, Russo G. Central WENO schemes for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 1999; 33:547-571.
23. Liu Y. Central schemes on overlapping cells. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 209:82-104.
24. Liu YJ, Shu CW, Tadmor E, Zhang M. Non-oscillatory hierarchical reconstruction for central and finite volume schemes. Communications in Mathematical Physics 2007; 2:933-963.
25. Noelle S, Rosenbaum W, Rumpf M. 3D adaptive central schemes: part I. Algorithms for assembling the dual mesh. Applied Numerical Mathematics 2006; 56:778-799.
26. Kurganov A, Tadmor E. New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection-diffusion equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2001; 160:241-282.
27. Kurganov A, Noelle S, Petrova G. Semi-discrete central-upwind schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and Hamilton-Jacobi equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2001; 23:707-740.
28. Roe PL. Characteristic-based schemes for the Euler equations. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 1986; 18: 337-365.
29. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme, II: monotonicity and conservation combined in a second order scheme. Journal of Computational Physics 1974; 17:361-370.
30. OpenCFD Ltd, 2004. Available from: http://www.openfoam.org.
31. Sod G. A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 1978; 22:1-31.
32. Woodward P, Colella P. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. Journal of Computational Physics 1984; 54:115-173.
33. Anderson JD. Modern Compressible Flow (3rd edn). McGraw-Hill: New York, U.S.A., 2003.
34. Emery AE. An evaluation of several differencing methods for inviscid fluid flow problems. Journal of Computational Physics 1968; 2:306-331.
35. Ladenburg R, van Voorhis CC, Winkler J. Interferometric studies of faster than sound phenomena. Part II. Analysis of supersonic air jets. Physical Review 1949; 76:662-677.
36. Winkler J. The Mach interferometer applied to studying an axially symmetric supersonic air jet. Review of Scientific Instruments 1948; 19:307-322.
37. Holden MS, Wadhams TP. Code validation study of laminar shock/boundary layer and shock/shock interactions in hypersonic flow. Part A: experimental measurements. AIAA Paper 2001-1031A, 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 2001.
38. Harvey JK, Holden MS, Wadhams TP. Code validation study of laminar shock/boundary layer and shock/shock interactions in hypersonic flow. Part B: comparison with Navier-Stokes and DSMC solutions. AIAA Paper 2001-1031B, 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 2001.
39. Candler GV, Nompelis I, Druguet MC, Holden MS, Wadhams TP, Boyd ID, Wang WL. CFD validations for hypersonic flight: hypersonic double-cone flow simulations. AIAA Paper 2002-0581, 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 2002.
40. Druguet MC, Candler GV, Nompelis I. Effect of numerics on Navier-Stokes computations of hypersonic double-cone flows. AIAA Journal 2005; 43:616-623.
41. Gaitonde DV, Canupp PW, Holden MS. Heat transfer predictions in a laminar hypersonic viscous/inviscid interaction. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 2002; 16:481-489.