The value from investments in health information technology at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Health Affairs

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 629-638

  Byrne, Colene M ^a   Mercincavage, Lauren M ^b   Pan, Eric C ^b   Vincent, Adam G ^b   Johnston, Douglas S ^b   Middleton, Blackford ^b  

^a PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^b Center for IT Leadership   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; INVESTMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES; VETERAN;

COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; INVESTMENTS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIVATE SECTOR; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS;

EID: 77953571513     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0119     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. VistA monograph [Internet]. Washington (DC): VA; 2010 Mar 5 [cited 2010 Mar 8]. Available from: http://www4.va.gov/VISTA-MONOGRAPH/
2. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. VistA [home page on the Internet]. Washington (DC): VA; [cited 2010 Mar 8]. Available from: http://www.ehealth.va. gov/EHEALTH/VistA.asp
3. Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs health care system on the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(22):2218-27.
4. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, Donelan K, Ferris TG, Jha A, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care - a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):50-60. (Pubitemid 351931096)
5. Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG, et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(16):1628-38.
6. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Baltimore (MD): CMS; 2010.
7. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Fiscal year 2002-2007 budget estimates. Washington (DC): VA; 2001-2006.
8. College of Healthcare Information Management Executives. IT cost benchmarking report. Ann Arbor (MI): CHIME; 2008.
9. Glenn M. HIMSS Analytics database. Chicago (IL): Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society; 2009 Jan 26.
10. PricewaterhouseCoopers. Modern Healthcare/PricewaterhouseCoopers IT survey: trends in IT spending among hospitals. New York (NY): PricewaterhouseCoopers; 2005.
11. Scottsdale Institute. IT bench survey results spreadsheet. Scottsdale (AZ): Scottsdale Institute; 2008.
12. American Hospital Association. The 2007 most wired survey and benchmark study participant report. Chicago (IL): AHA; 2007.
13. Blumenthal D, DesRoches CM, Donelan K, Ferris T, Jha AK, Kaushal R, et al. Health information technology in the United States: the information base for progress [Internet]. Princeton (NJ): Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2006 [cited 2010 Mar 11]. Available from: http://www.rwjf.org/pr/product.jsp?id=15895
14. An electronic health record is defined by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology as an "electronic record of health-related information on an individual that conforms to nationally recognized interoperability standards and that can be created, managed, and consulted by authorized clinicians and staff across more than one health care organization." An electronic health record also serves as the foundation for other functions such as clinical decision support. An electronic medical record is defined as an electronic health record that shares data only within its organization. These terms are often used interchangeably. While electronic health record best captures VistA, some of the IT adoption and capabilities frameworks are based on electronic medical record functionality and adoption; both have similar capabilities.
15. American Hospital Association. Continued progress: hospital use of information technology. Chicago (IL): AHA; 2007.
16. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. 2008 annual report of the U.S. hospital IT market. Chicago (IL): HIMSS; 2008.
17. Schoen C, Osborn R, Huynh PT, Doty M, Peugh J, Zapert K. On the front lines of care: primary care doctors' office systems, experiences, and views in seven countries. Health Aff. (Millwood) 2006;25(6):w555-71.
18. Hing ES, Burt CW, Woodwell DA. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006. Adv Data. 2007;393:1-7.
19. Department of Veterans Affairs. VistA monograph.Washington (DC): VA; 2005.
20. Office of Quality Performance, Veterans Health Administration. Performance reports. Internal data. Washington (DC): VHA.
21. National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS and quality measurement [Internet]. Washington (DC): NCQA; 2010 [cited 2010 Feb 17]. Available from: http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/59/Default.aspx
22. Joint Commission. The Joint Commission [home page on the Internet]. City (ST): Joint Commission; 2010 [cited 2010 Feb 17]. Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/
23. Volpe B, Department of Veterans Affairs. Interview with the authors; 2009 Jan 22.
24. Demakis JG, Beauchamp C, Cull WL, Denwood R, Eisen SA, Lofgren R, et al. Improving residents' compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results fromthe VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders. JAMA. 2000;284(11):1411-6.
25. Fung CH, Tsai JS, Lulejian A, Glassman P, Patterson E, Doebbeling BN, et al. An evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's clinical reminders system: a national survey of generalists. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(4):392-8. (Pubitemid 351464864)
26. Kupersmith J, Francis J, Kerr E, Krein S, Pogach L, Kolodner RM, et al. Advancing evidence-based care for diabetes: lessons from the Veterans Health Administration. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(2):w156-68.
27. Office of Management and Budget. Budget for fiscal year 2010, historical tables [Internet]. Washington (DC): OMB; 2009. Available from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/
28. Department of Veterans Affairs. Fiscal year 2010 budget submission, vol. 2, medical programs and information technology programs. Washington (DC): VA; 2009.
29. The Technical Appendix can be accessed by clicking on the Technical Appendix link in the box to the right of the article online.
30. Curtis C. A computer-based patient record emerging from the public sector: the decentralized hospital computer program. Presented at: First Annual Nicholas E. Davies CPR Recognition Symposium; 1995.
31. Brown SH, Lincoln MJ, Groen PJ, Kolodner RM. VistA - U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs national-scale HIS. Int J Med Inform. 2003;69(2-3):135-56.
32. Weier MH. Numbers crunch. Information Week. 2009 Jan 26:25-9.
33. Pedersen CA, Gumpper KF. ASHP national survey on informatics: assessment of the adoption and use of pharmacy informatics in U.S. hospitals - 2007. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(23):2244-64.
34. Pedersen CA, Schneider PJ, Scheckelhoff DJ. ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: prescribing and transcribing - 2007. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(9):827-43.
35. See Supplemental Exhibit 5, online as in Note 29.
36. Asch SM, McGlynn EA, Hogan MM, Hayward RA, Shekelle P, Rubenstein L, et al. Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(12):938-45. (Pubitemid 40040977)
37. Perlin JB, Kolodner RM, Roswell RH. The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10(11 Pt 2):828-36.
38. Shea S, Weinstock RS, Starren J, Teresi J, Palmas W, Field L, et al. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(1):40-51. (Pubitemid 41828334)
39. Friedberg MW, Coltin KL, Safran DG, Dresser M, Zaslavsky AM, Schneider EC. Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(7):456-63.
40. Himmelstein DU, Wright A, Woolhandler S. Hospital computing and the costs and quality of care: a national study. Am J Med. 2010;123(1):40-6.
41. National Quality Forum. National voluntary consensus standards for health information technology: structural measures 2008 - a consensus report. Washington (DC): NQF; 2008.
42. Kern LM, Dhopeshwarkar R, Barrón Y, Wilcox A, Pincus H, Kaushal R. Measuring the effects of health information technology on quality of care: a novel set of proposed metrics for electronic quality reporting. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35(7):359-69.