Delivering quality-evaluated healthcare information in the era of web 2.0: Design implications for intute: Health and life sciences

Health Informatics Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 5-14

  Abbott, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Education; Healthcare; Information services; Quality; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HEALTH EDUCATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICE; INTERNET; STANDARD;

CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HEALTH EDUCATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET;

EID: 77953557619     PISSN: 14604582     EISSN: 17412811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1460458209353555     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. O'Reilly T. What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/ 2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html?page=1.
2. Warr W A. Social software: fun and games, or business tools? Journal of Information Science 2008; 34; 591-604.
3. Hughes B, Joshi I, Wareham J. Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: tensions and controversies in the field. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2008; 10 (3); e23.
4. Anderson P. What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch, February 2007. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf.
5. Boulos M N K, Wheeler S. The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2007; 24; 2-23.
6. Giustini D. Editorial: how Web 2.0 is changing medicine. British Medical Journal 2006; 333; 1283-1284
7. Perryer G, Lambe C S, Attrill D, Walmsley A D. Podcasts, wikis, videos, and blogs: a case study in dental education. MEDEV Bulletin 2007; Spring; 6-7.
8. Beakes G. A picture is worth a thousand words: a personal view of using images in the teaching of the biological sciences. http://www.bioscience. heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol1/beej-1-3.htm.
9. Kovic I, Lulic I, Brumini G. Examining the medical blogosphere: an online survey of medical bloggers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2008; 10 (3); e28.
10. Cann A J. Podcasting is dead. Long live video! http://www.bioscience. heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol10/beej-10-c1.htm.
11. Ahonen T T, O'Reilly J. Digital Korea. London: Futuretext, 2007.
12. Joly K. A Second Life for higher education? Virtual worlds may wind up breathing new life into teaching, learning, and creative expression. University Business June 2007. http://www.universitybusiness.com/viewarticle.aspx? articleid=797.
13. Hansen M M. Versatile, immersive, creative and dynamic virtual 3-D healthcare learning environments: a review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2008; 10 (3); e26.
14. A sexual health SIM in Second Life. University of Plymouth. http://sl-sexualhealth.org.uk/.
15. Snapshots of Second Life use in UK HE and FE. Eduserv. http://www.eduserv.org.uk/foundation/studies/slsnapshots.
16. Azzawi M, Dawson M M. The effectiveness of lecture-integrated, web-supported case studies in large group teaching. Bioscience Education September 2007. http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol10/beej-10-4. htm.
17. Sandars J, Schroter S. Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2007; 83; 759-762
18. Intute: Health and Life Sciences. http://www.intute.ac.uk/medicine (NB Since preparation of this paper, the Intute HLS website has split into subject-specific sites. This URL is the page for Medicine including dentistry).
19. Intute: Health and Life Sciences Evaluation Guidelines. http://www.intute.ac.uk/supportdocs/IntuteHLS-Evaluation-Guidelines.doc.
20. Abbott R. The World as Information. Exeter: Intellect, 1999.
21. Savolainen R. Filtering and withdrawing: strategies for coping with information overload in everyday contexts. Journal of Information Science 2007; 33 (5); 611-621
22. Vise D A. The Google Story. London: Macmillan, 2005 147.
23. Jennings D. Net, Blogs and Rock 'n' Roll. London: Brealey, 2007, 1.
24. Bradley P. How to use Web 2.0 in your library. London: Facet, 2007, 45.
25. Keen A. The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy. London: Brealey, 2007.
26. Surowiecki J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few. London: Abacus, 2005, xiii-xiv.
27. Health 2.0. The Economist 6 September 2007. http://www.economist.com/ displaystory.cfm?story-id=9719054.
28. Kortum P, Edwards C, Richards-Kortum R. The impact of inaccurate Internet health information in a secondary school learning environment. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2008; 10 (2); e17.
29. Giustini D. Web 3.0 and Medicine. British Medical Journal 2007; 335; 1273-1274. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/335/7633/1273.
30. In their own words: exploring the learner's perspective on e-learning. JISC, 2007. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/intheirownwords.
31. Furedi F. Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone? Confronting 21st Century Philistinism. London: Continuum, 2004, 116.
32. Brabazon T. The University of Google: Education in the (Post) Information Age. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007, 82-83
33. Abbott R. Subjectivity as a concern for information science: a Popperian perspective. Journal of Information Science 2004; 30 (2); 95-106.
34. Web 2.0 and social software: an introduction. JISC, September 2007. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/web2socialsoftwarev1pdf.pdf.
35. Skiba D J. Nursing education 2.0: Twitter and tweets. Nursing Education Perspectives 2008; 29 (2); 110-112
36. Information behaviour of the researcher of the future: a CIBER briefing paper. University College London, 11 January 2008. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/slais/ research/ciber/downloads/ggexecutive.pdf.
37. Guest T. Second Lives: A Journey through Virtual Worlds. London: Hutchinson, 2007, 345.
38. Rheingold H. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Basic, 2002, 25.
39. Wales J. Next billion will change the way we think. The Guardian Weekly 20 June 2008.
40. Joyce A, Wickham J, Cross P, Stephens C. Intute integration. Ariadne April 2008 (55). .